Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:47:12.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Poverty Wear a Woman's Face? Some Moral Dimensions of a Transnational Feminist Research Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Alison M. Jaggar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explains some moral dimensions of a transnational feminist research project designed to provide a better standard or metric for measuring poverty across the world. The author is an investigator on this project. Poverty metrics incorporate moral judgments about what is necessary for a decent life, so justifying metrics requires moral argumentation. The article clarifies the moral aspects of poverty valuation, indicates some moral flaws in existing global poverty metrics, and outlines some conditions for a better global metric. It then explains the methodology used in our project, providing its moral rationale and discussing some remaining moral concerns.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Crossing Borders Special Issue , Spring 2013 , pp. 240 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, Sabina, and Santos, Maria E. 2010. Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. OPHI Working Paper 38. http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ophi-wp38.pdf (accessed November 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo (aka Joreen). 1972. The tyranny of structurelessness. The Second Wave 2 (1).Google Scholar
Fürst‐L'Orange, Elisabeth. 2010. The feminization of poverty: The case of Moldova. Talk at Oslo, Litteraturhuset, June 15.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter B. 1956. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Duncan. 2010. Are women really 70% of the world's poor? How do we know? From poverty to power. http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p = 1797 (accessed November 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Hunt, Janet. 2010. Assessing poverty, gender and well‐being in ‘northern’ indigenous communities. In International Handbook on Gender and Poverty, ed. Chant, Sylvia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Khader, Serene. 2011. Adaptive preferences and women's empowerment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okin, Susan M. 2003. Poverty, well‐being, and gender: What counts, who's heard? Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3): 280–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, and Reddy, Sanjay. 2005/2010. How not to count the poor. In Debates on the measurement of global poverty, ed. Anand, Sudhir, Segal, Paul and Stiglitz, Joseph. Oxford: Oxford University Press. First published online at http://www.socialanalysis.org.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2010. Politics as usual. Cambridge, UK, and Malden, Mass.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ravallion, Martin, Chen, Shaohua, and Sangraula, Prem. 2009. Dollar a day. The World Bank Economic Review 23 (2): 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776/1904. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. Edwin Cannan. London: Methuen and Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Wisor, Scott. 2011. Measuring global poverty: Toward a pro‐poor approach. Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Woodward, David. 2010. How poor is ‘poor’? Towards a rights‐based poverty line. http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/how-poor-is-poor (accessed November 2, 2012).Google Scholar