Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:42:33.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Marriage Require a Head? Some Historical Arguments∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Linda A. Bell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are hierarchies necessary in human relationships? This issue is a central one for feminist theory, and there is a continuing need to rethink relationships and to envision what they might be like without any sort of dominance of some over others. To aid this process of envisioning alternatives, this paper examines more closely the way one of the most intimate of hierarchies — marriage — has been argued and envisioned historically.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 4 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The History of Women in Philosophy , Spring 1989 , pp. 139 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

For his perceptive readings of an earlier draft of this paper and for his many helpful suggestions and comments, I am grateful to Albert C. Skaggs.

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1922. Summa theologica. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, trans. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1946. Politics, Benjamin Jowett, I., trans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Bernard Frechtman, trans. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1971. The second sex. H. M. Parshley, trans. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. 1975. The positive philosophy. Gertrud Lenzer, trans. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de, Antoine‐Nicolas, Marie‐Jean. 1983. Letters from a dweller in New Heaven to a citizen of Virginia, on the uselessness of sharing legislative power among several bodies. Barton Palmer, R., trans. Visions of Women. Bell, Linda A. ed., Clifton, NJ: The Humana Press.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de, Antoine‐Nicolas, Marie‐Jean. 1912. On the admission of women to the rights of citizenship. Alice Drysdale Vickery, trans. Letchworth: Garden City Press Limited.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1983. Women. Encyclopedia of Diderot and d'AIembert. Barton Palmer, R. and Seay, Irene B. trans., Visions of Women. Bell, Linda A. ed., Clifton, NJ: The Humana Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. B. 1889. The science of rights. A. E. Kroeger, trans. London: Trubner and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1963. His religion and hers. Westport, Conn.: Hyperion Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1971. The man‐made world. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1841. Philosophical elements of a true citizen. In Philosophical rudiments concerning government and society. The English works of Thomas Hobbes. (vol. 2). Sir Molesworth, William ed., London: John Bonn.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1875. Of love and marriage. In Essays, moral, political, and literary. Greena, T. H. and Grose, T. H., eds. London: Longsman, Green, and Company.Google Scholar
James, William. 1869. A review [of] 1. Women's suffrage and reform against nature, by Bushnell, Horace, New York,. Scribner, 1869. [and] 2. The subjection of women, by John Stuart Mill, New York. Appleton, 1869. The North American Review (October).Google Scholar
Jerome, . 1893. Against Jovinianus. in The principle works of St. Jerome. Fremantle, W. H., Lewis, G., and Martley, W. B. trans., In A select library of Nicene and Post‐Nicene fathers of the Christian Church, (vol. 2). Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry, eds.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1974. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Mary J. Gregor, trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2018-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1975. Journals and papers. Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H., eds. (Vol. 4, S‐Z). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1974. Mere Christianity. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1824. Essay concerning the true original, extent, and end of civil government. In Two treaties of government. in The works of John Locke. (vol 4). London: C. Baldwin.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1869. The subjection of women. New York: D. Appleton and Company.10.1037/12288-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de, De Secondat, Charles‐Louis. 1899. The spirit of laws. Thomas Nugent, trans. New York: The Colonial Press.Google Scholar
Mott, Lucretia. 1884. Discourse on Woman. In Life and letters. Davis Hallowell, Alice, ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin & Company.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1909. Human, all‐too‐human, part I. In The complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche, (vol. 6). Zimmerman, Helen trans., Levy, Oscar ed., London: T. N. Foulis.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1910. The joyful wisdom. In The complete works of Friedrich Nietzsche. (vol. 10). Common, Thomas trans., Levy, Oscar ed., London: T. N. Foulis.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1923. Thus spake Zarathustra. Thomas Common, trans. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, Jose. 1957. On love. Toby Talbot, trans. New York: World Publishing.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1911. Emile. Barbara Foxley, trans. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1950. A discourse on political economy, and the social contract and discourses. G. D. H. Cole, trans. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1929. Marriage and morals. New York: Horace Liveright.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 1932. The life of reason, Book II. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1951. “On women,” Essays, T.Saunders, Bailey, trans. London: George Allen & Unwin LTD.Google Scholar