Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:09:19.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Disunities of Science(s) and Technoscientific Fortuity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Eduardo Mendieta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium Sandra Harding's Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues
Information
Hypatia , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 192 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. W. 1973. Negative dialectics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick. 2005. Silent covenant: Brown v. Board of Education and the unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2001. Material culture, theoretical culture, and delocalization. In Schools of thought: Twenty‐five years of interpretative social science, ed. Scott, Joan W. and Keates, Debra. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2006. Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar