Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:29:10.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disability and Sexual Inclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

Abstract

Many disabled people face some form of exclusion or discrimination. One of the most damaging, yet pervasive, types of exclusion is sexual exclusion. Various factors hinder sexual opportunities for disabled persons, such as social attitudes around body image, gender, and sexuality. In this paper, I engage with Sheila Jeffreys's paper, “Disability and the Male Sex Right,” wherein she argues that discourse around sexual rights for disabled people is a veiled way of promoting male dominance over women. Though Jeffreys raises many pertinent issues, she assumes that when a disabled man seeks commercial sex, he does so as an act of domination or violence. I argue that when a disabled man seeks commercial sex, he is seeking the goods of sex, such as connection, intimacy, and pleasure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thank you to Colin Macleod for his endless support and words of encouragement. Thank you also to Audrey Yap for her constant positivity and for bringing this call for papers to my attention. Finally, thank you to my friend, who will remain nameless, for broaching the subject of sex and disability with me.

References

AASECT: American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists. 2013. Sexual surrogacy revisited. Contemporary Sexuality 47 (1): 26.Google Scholar
Cohen‐Greene, Cheryl. 2012. An intimate life: Sex, love, and my journey as a surrogate partner. Berkeley: Soft Skull Press.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 2008. Disability and the male sex right. Women's Studies International Forum 31 (5): 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortunata, Jacqueline. 1980. Masturbation and women's sexuality. In The philosophy of sex, ed. Soble, A. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Mark. 1990. On seeing a sex surrogate. The Sun Magazine, May 1990. http://thesunmagazine.org/issues/174/on_seeing_a_sex_surrogate (accessed April 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Rousselle, S. 2013. Seeking sexual surrogates. The New York Times, July 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/video/world/europe/100000002304193/seeking-sexual-surrogates.html (accessed October 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Sanders, Teela. 2005. Female sex workers as health educators with men who buy sex: Utilising narratives of rationalizations. Social Science and Medicine 62 (10): 2434–44.Google Scholar
Sanders, Teela. 2007. The politics of sexual citizenship: Commercial sex and disability. Disability & Society 22 (5): 439–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Debra. 2010. Markets in women's sexual labor. In Why some things should not be for sale: The moral limits of markets. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. 2012. Scarlet road: A sex worker's journey. CBC: The Passionate Eye. http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeye/episode/scarlet-road-a-sex-workers-journey.html (accessed April 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. 1999. The sexual politics of disabled masculinity. Sexuality and Disability 17 (1): 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, Allison. 1999. Personal and perplexing: Feminist disability politics evaluated. Disability & Society 14 (5): 643–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, , Russell, Nikki Wedgwood, and Nathan, J. Wilson. 2012. The dilemma of disabled masculinity. Men and Masculinities 15 (2): 174194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2012. Sexual culture for disabled people. In Sex and disability, ed. McRuer, Robert, Durham, Anna Mollow. and C, N., and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Stienstra, Deborah. 2012. Race/ethnicity and disability studies: Towards an explicitly intersectional approach. In Routledge handbook of disability studies, ed. Watson, N., Roulestone, W. and Thomas, C. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tepper, Mitchell. 2000. Sexuality and disability: The missing discourse of pleasure. Sexuality and Disability 18 (4): 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touching, Base. n.d. Outcomes of our work. Touching Base Inc. http://www.touchingbase.org/about-us/history/outcomes-of-our-work (accessed October 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald. 2005. New directions in research on prostitution. Crime, Law and Social Change 43 (4–5): 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar