Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:43:41.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diremption of Love: Gillian Rose on Agency, Mortality, and Hegelian Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Asaf Angermann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gillian Rose (1947–1995) was an influential though idiosyncratic British philosopher whose work helped introduce the Frankfurt School's critical theory and renew interest in Hegel, Kierkegaard, and Jewish thought in Anglo‐American philosophy. After years of relative oblivion, her life and thought have recently received new attention in philosophy, sociology, and theology. However, her work's critical Hegelian contribution to feminist philosophy still remains unexplored. This article seeks to reassess the place and the meaning of feminism and gender identity in Rose's work by addressing both her philosophical writings and her personal memoir, written in the months preceding her untimely death. It argues that although Rose's overall work was not developed in a feminist context, her philosophy, and in particular her ethical‐political notion of diremption, is valuable for developing a critical feminist philosophy that overcomes the binaries of law and morality, inclusion and exclusion, power and powerlessness—and focuses on the meaning of love as negotiating, rather than mediating, these oppositions.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Spring 2019 , pp. 309 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W., and Benjamin, Walter. 2001. The complete correspondence 1928–1940, ed. Lonitz, Henri. Trans. Nicholas Walker. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Trans. Daniel Heller‐Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1929 /1996. Love and Saint Augustine, ed. Vecchiarelli Scott, Joanna and Chelius Stark, Judith. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1951 /1973. The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1959 /1997. Rahel Varnhagen: The life of a Jewess. Trans. Richard and Clara Winston, ed. Weissberg, Liliane. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1963 /2007. The Eichmann controversy—A letter to Gershom Scholem. In The Jewish writings, ed. Kohn, Jerome and Feldman, Ron H. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1966 /1988. Rosa Luxemburg: 1871–1919. In Men in dark times. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. 1998. The broken Hegel: Gillian Rose's retrieval of speculative philosophy. Women: A Cultural Review 9 (1): 19–27.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1948. On Christianity: Early theological writings. Trans. T. M. Knox and Richard Kroner. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2003. Hegel and feminist philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1843 /1983. Fear and trembling and repetition. Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1845 /1988. Stages on life's way. Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. 1847 /1998. Works of love. Trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Vincent, ed. 2008a. An interview with Gillian Rose. Theory, Culture, and Society 25 (7–8): 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Vincent. 2008b. On Gillian Rose and love. Telos 143: 47–62.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Vincent. 2009. Law and transcendence: On the unfinished project of Gillian Rose. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, Vincent. 2015. Gillian Rose, race, and identity. Telos 173: 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. 1900 /2008. Reform or revolution. In The essential Rosa Luxemburg, ed. Scott, Helen. Chicago: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Marcus, Laura. 1998. The work of Gillian Rose: An introduction. Women: A Cultural Review 9 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988a. The fraternal social contract. In Civil society and the state, ed. Keane, John. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988b. The sexual contract. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Ratekin, Tom. 2009. Final acts: Traversing the fantasy in the modern memoir. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1978 /2014. The melancholy science: An introduction to the thought of Theodor W. Adorno. New York: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1992. The broken middle: Out of our ancient society. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1993/2017. Judaism and modernity: Philosophical essays. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Rose, Gillian. 1995/2012. Love's work: A reckoning with life. New York: New York Review Books.Google Scholar
Schick, Kate. 2012. Gillian Rose: A good enough justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 2011. Illness as metaphor [1978] and AIDS and its metaphors [1989]. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Tubbs, Nigel. 2000. Mind the gap: The philosophy of Gillian Rose. Thesis Eleven 60 (1): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar