Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:54:01.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Redistribution: The Case of the Indian Panchayats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Shirin M. Rai
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By examining evidence from India, where quotas for women in local government were introduced in 1993, this article argues that institutional reform can disturb hegemonic discourses sufficiently to open a window of opportunity where deliberative democratic norms take root and where, in addition to the politics of recognition, the politics of redistribution also operates.

Type
Revisioning Deliberation
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Democratic Theory , Fall 2007 , pp. 64 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxi, Pratiksha, Rai, Shirin M., and Ali, Shaheen Sardar. 2006. Legacies of common law: Crimes of honour in India and Pakistan. Third World Quarterly 27(7): 1239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James, and Rehg, William, eds. 1997. Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch, Nirmala. 2000. Women's experience in new panchayats: The emerging leadership of rural women occasional. Paper 35. New Delhi, Centre for Women's Development Studies.Google Scholar
Chand, Prem. 1996. Prem Chand aur unki shreshta kahaniyan (Prem Chand and his best stories). Ed. Vikram, Nand Kishore. Delhi: Sahityagar.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve, 2002, Five arguments for deliberative democracy. In Democracy as public deliberation, ed. D’Éntrèves, .Google Scholar
Maurizio Passerin, D’Éntrèves, ed. 2002 Democracy as public deliberation, new perspectives. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ford Foundation. 2002. From public administration to governance. New Delhi: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a “post‐socialist” age. New Left Review 1(212): 68–93.Google Scholar
Goetz, Anne‐Marie, ed. 1997. Getting institutions right for women in development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Gopal, Jayal Niraja, Prakash, Amit and Sharma, Pradeep K., (eds.), 2006, Local Governance in India, Decentralization and Beyond. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Three normative models of democracy. In Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karat, Brinda, 2004. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid‐61404,curpg‐2.cms (accessed October 25, 2004).Google Scholar
Karat, Brinda. 2005. Survival and emancipation. New Delhi: Three Essays.Google Scholar
Kaushik, Susheela. 1993. Women and Panchayati Raj. New Delhi: Har‐Anand Publications.Google ScholarPubMed
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Transnational advocacy networks in international politics: Introduction. In Activists beyond borders: Transnational advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack, and Johnson, James. 1997. What sort of political equality does deliberative democracy require? In Deliberative democracy, ed. Bohman, and Rehg, .Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manikyamba, P. 2004, Women in Panchayati Raj institutions: Future trends and new perspectives. Paper presented at the National Seminar on Women in Panchayati Raj. April 27–28. Indian Social Institute, New Delhi .Google Scholar
Mayaram, Shail, and Pritam, Pal. 1996. Women Panchayat representatives in Rajasthan: Performance and problems. Humanscape 3(11): 17–19.Google Scholar
Meehan, Johanna. 1995. Introduction. In Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse, ed. Meehan, Johanna. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The politics of presence: The political representation of gender, ethnicity, and race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1999. Which equalities matter? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Sol. 2001. Democratizing globalism. In The market of the public domain: Global governance and the asymmetry of power, ed. Drache, Daniel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin M., ed. 1996. Women and the state: International perspectives. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin M., ed. 1997. Gender and representation in the Indian Parliament. In Getting institutions right for women in development, ed. Goetz, Anne‐Marie. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin M., ed., Bari, F., Mahtab, N., and Mohanty, B. South Asia: Gender quotas and the politics of empowerment—a comparative study. In Women, quotas, and politics, ed. Dahlerup, D. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, 1992, Inequality Reexamined, New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, B. D. 2000. Women, Panchayats, and rural power structure. Paper presented at the Women in Panchayat Raj Seminar. April 27–28. Bangalore, Karnataka Women's Information and Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith, 2002, Deliberation and decision making: Discontinuity in the two‐track model. In Democracy as public deliberation, ed. D’Éntrèves, .Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 1998. Pathologies of deliberation. In Deliberative democracy, ed. Elster, Jon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Sophie. 1989. Playing the state: Australian feminist interventions. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1995. Together in difference: Transforming the logic of group political conflict. In The rights of minority cultures, ed. Kymlicka, Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Unruly categories: A critique of Nancy Fraser's dual systems theory. New Left Review 222(March–April): 147–60.Google Scholar