Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:56:28.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing Lovers: Luce Irigaray's Elemental Passions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Cecilia Sjöholm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Luce Irigaray's Elemental Passions could be read as a response to Merleau-Ponty's article “The Intertwining—The Chiasm” in The Visible and the Invisible. Like Merleau-Ponty, Irigaray describes corporeal intertwining or vision and touch. Counteracting the narcissistic strain in Merleau-Ponty's chiasm, she assumes that sexual difference must precede the intertwining. The subject is marked by the alterity or the “more than one” and encoded as a historically contingent gendered conflict.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , Summer 2000 , pp. 92 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1998. Metaphysics. 9 vols. Trans Rackman, H.The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BurkeCarolyn, Naomi Schor Carolyn, Naomi Schor, and Whitford, Margaret, eds. 1994. Engaging with Irigaray. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1993. Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina 1995. The ethics of eros. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Empedocles, . 1992. The poem of Empedocles. Trans.Inwood, Brian. Phoenix Presocratics, vol. 3. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1953. Analysis terminable and interminable. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 23, ed. and trans.Strachey, James. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Fynsk, Christopher 1996. Language and relation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane 1990. Thinking through the body. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth 1989. Sexual subversions. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1983. L'Oubli de l'air. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1985. This sex which is not one. Trans.Porter, C. and Burke, C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1991. Marine lover. Trans G. Gill New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1992. Elemental passions. Trans.Collie, J. and Still, J.London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce 1993. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans.Burke, C. and Gill, G.London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques 1975. Encore: Le séminaire XX Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich 1963. Elemente der literarischen Rhetorik. München: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude 1990. Flesh and otherness. In Ontology and alterity in Merleau‐Ponty, ed.Johnson, Galen A. and Smith, Michael B.Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice 1968. The visible and the invisible. Trans.Lingis, Alphonso. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril 1986. Sexual, textual politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Ellen 1994. Woman's untruth and le féminin: Reading Luce Irigaray with Nietzsche and Heidegger. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed. Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret New York: Columbia University Ptess.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Ellen 1995. The feminine and nihilism. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Preminger, Otto, ed. 1965. Princeton encyclopedia of poetry and poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sappho, . 1982. Greek Lyric 1. Trans.Campbell, D. A.The Loeb Classical Library. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schor, Naomi 1994. This essentialism which is not one: Coming to grips with Irigaray. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed.Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Vasseleu, Cathryn 1997. Textures of light: Vision and touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau‐Ponty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weed, Elizabeth 1994. A question of style. In Engaging with Irigaray, ed.Burke, Carolyn, Schor, Naomi, and Whitford, Margaret. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret 1991. Luce Irigaray. London: Routledge.Google Scholar