Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:07:53.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confucian Ethics and Care Ethics: The Political Dimension of a Scholarly Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Chenyang Li
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Musings
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 897 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1987. Hume, the women's moral theorist? In Women and moral theory, ed. Feder Kittay, Eva and Meyers, Diana T. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Fung, Yulan. 1973. A history of Chinese philosophy (vol. I). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 2006. The ethics of care: Personal, political, global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2003. Is Confucianism compatible with care ethics? A critique. Philosophy East and West 53 (4): 471–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupperman, J. Joel. 2000. Feminism as radical Confucianism: Self and tradition. In The sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethics, and gender, ed. Li, Chenyang. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1993. Natural kinds: Direct reference, realism, and the impossibility of necessary a posteriori truth. Review of Metaphysics 47 (2): 261–76.Google Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 1994. The Confucian concept of jen and the feminist ethics of care: A comparative study. Hypatia 9 (1): 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Chenyang. 2000. Introduction: Can Confucianism come to terms with feminism? In The sage and the second sex: Confucianism, ethics, and gender, ed. Li, Chenyang. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 2010. The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenlee, Li‐Hsiang Lisa. 2014. Confucian care: A hybrid feminist ethics. In Asian and feminist philosophies in dialogue: Liberating traditions, ed. McWeeny, Jennifer and Butnor, Ashby. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Star, Daniel. 2002. Do Confucians really care? A defense of the distinctiveness of care ethics: A reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia 17 (1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, Christine. 2003. Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Julia. 2000. Two perspectives of care: Confucian ren and feminist care. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27 (2): 215–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Cecilia. 2003. Mencius, the feminist perspective and impartiality. Asian Philosophy 13 (1): 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Lijun. 2002. Ethics of care and concept of jen: A reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia 17 (1): 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar