Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T22:46:30.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Nancy Tuana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lay understanding and scientific accounts of female sexuality and orgasm provide a fertile site for demonstrating the importance of including epistemologies of ignorance within feminist epistemologies. Ignorance is not a simple lack. It is often constructed, maintained, and disseminated and is linked to issues of cognitive authority, doubt, trust, silencing, and uncertainty. Studying both feminist and nonfeminist understandings of female orgasm reveals practices that suppress or erase bodies of knowledge concerning women's sexual pleasures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 19 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Feminist Science Studies , Winter 2004 , pp. 194 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allgeier, Albert Richard and Allgeier, Elizabeth Rice. 1984, 1988, 1998. Sexual interactions. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath and Co.Google Scholar
Alzate, Heli. 1985. Vaginal eroticism: A replication study. Archives of Sexual Behavior 14(6): 529–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annie Sprinkle's Herstory of Porn. 1999. Produced and directed by Annie Sprinkle and Carol Leigh Scarlot Harlot). 69 min. Hardcore Documentary. Videocassette.Google Scholar
Apollodorus, . 1976. The gods and heroes of the Greeks: The library of Apollodorus. Trans. Simpson, Michael. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R. Robin, and Bellis, Mark A. 1995. Human sperm competition: Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Barash, David. 1977. Sociobiology and behavior. New York: Elsevier North‐Holland.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Boston Woman's Health Book Collective. 1984. The New our bodies, ourselves: A book by and for women. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Byer, Curtis O., and Shainberg, Louis W. 1985, 1988, 1991, 1998, 2001. Dimensions of human sexuality. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Cadden, Joan. 1993. Meanings of sex difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, science and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, John B., and Telford, Ira. 1978. Synopsis of gross anatomy 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Columbus, Renaldus. 1559. De re anatomica. Venice .Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gynlecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Robert Latou. 1941. The gynecology of homosexuality, Appendix VI. In Sex variants: A study of homosexual patterns, ed. Henry, George W.New York, London: Paul B. Hoeber.Google Scholar
Dixson, Alan. 1998. Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fausto‐Sterling, Anne. 1995. Gender, race, and nation: The comparative anatomy of “Hottentot” women in Europe, 1815–1817. In Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture, ed. Terry, Jennifer and Urla, Jacqueline. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Federation of Feminist Women's Health Centers. 1981. A new view of a woman's body: A fully illustrated guide; illustrations by Suzann Gage; photographs by Sylvia Morales. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ferrier, James F. 1854. Institutes of metaphysic. Edinburgh: Blackwood.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Ed. and trans. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1989. Friendship as a way of life. In Foucault live. Trans. Johnston, John. Ed. Lotringer, Sylvere. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1962. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Trans. and Ed. Strachey, James. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1964. Femininity. In Standard edition of the complete psychological works. Volume 22. Trans. and Ed. Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine and Laqueur, Thomas, eds. 1987. The making of the modern body: Sexuality and society in the nineteenth century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodall, Jane. 1988. In the shadow of man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Grafenburg, Ernst. 1950. The role of the urethra in female orgasm. The International Journal of Sexology 3: 145–48.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William. 1858602001. Lectures on metaphysics and logic. In Works of William Hamilton, ed. Tropea, Savina. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2000. How like a leaf: An interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is science multi‐cultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and episte‐mologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hesiod, . 1983. Theogony, works and days, and the shield. Trans. Athanassakis, Apostolos. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Hite, Shere. 1976. The Hite report: A nationwide study of female sexuality. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1978. A treatise of human nature. Ed. Amherst Selby‐Bigge, Lewis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lnanna: Queen of heaven and earth, her stories and hymns from Sumer. 1983. Trans. Wolkstein, Diane and Kramer, Samuel Noah. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1985. Speculum of the other woman. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Gary F. 1988, 1994, 1998, 2001. Sexuality today: The human perspective. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Kimber, Diana Clifford, Gray, Carolyn E., Stackpole, Caroline E., Leavell, Lutie C., Miller, Mar‐jorie A. 1966. Anatomy and physiology 15th ed. New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
Kinsey, Alfred C., and the staff of the Institute for Sex Research, Indiana University. 1953. Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Sheila. 1985. Women's experience of sex: The facts and feelings of female sexuality at every stage of life. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Koedt, Ann. 1970. The myth of the vaginal orgasm. In Notes from the second year: Women's liberation, ed. Firestone, Shulamith and Koedt, Ann. New York: Radical Feminism.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 1986. Orgasm, generation, and the politics of reproductive biology. Representations 14: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 1989. ‘Amor Veneris, vel Dulcedo Appeleur.’. In Fragments for a history of the human body, ed. Feher, Michel. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edward, Laumann O., Gagnon, John H., Michael, Robert T., and Michaels, Stewart. 1994. The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith. 1990. Theory of knowledge. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Elisabeth A. 1993. Pre‐theoretical assumptions in evolutionary explanations of female sexuality. Philosophical Studies 69:139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, Lynn, and Sagan, Dorion. 1991. Mystery dance: On the evolution of human sexuality. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
Masters, William H., and Johnson, Virginia E. 1966. Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
McAnulty, Richard D., and Michele Burnette, M. 2001. Exploring human sexuality: Making healthy decisions. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
McWhorter, LaDelle. 1999. Bodies & pleasures: Foucault and the politics of sexual normalization. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles S. 1997. The racial contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Lisa Jean, and Clarke, Adele E. 1995. Clitoral conventions and transgressions: Graphic representations in anatomy texts, cl900–1991. Feminist studies 21(2): 255–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paré, Ambroise. 1968. The collected works of Ambroise Paré. Trans. Johnson, Thomas. New York: Milford House.Google Scholar
Perry, John Delbert, and Whipple, Beverly. 1981. Pelvic muscle strength of female ejaculators: Evidence in support of a new theory of orgasm Journal of Sex Research 17(1): 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Robert N. 1995. Cancer wars: How politics shapes what we know and don't know about cancer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rathus, Spencer A., Nevid, Jeffrey S., and Fichner‐Rathus, Lois. 1993, 2000, 2002. Human sexuality in a world of diversity. 5th Ed. Boston: and Bacon.Google Scholar
Rosen, Raymond, and Rosen, Linda Reich. 1981. Human sexuality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa L. 1989. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1990. Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shulman, Alix. 1971. Organs and orgasms. In Women in sexist society, ed. Gornick, Vivian and Moran, Barbara K. New York, New American Library.Google Scholar
Singer, Josephine, and Singer, Irving. 1972. Types of female orgasm Journal of Sex Research 8(4): 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Meredith F. 1995. What's love got to do with it? The evolution of human mating. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Sprecher, Susan, Barbee, Anita, and Schwartz, Pepper. 2001. “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experience. In Social psychology and human sexuality, ed. Baumeister, Roy F.Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Symons, Donald. 1979. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Jennifer. 1995. Anxious slippages between “us” and “them”: A brief history of the scientific search for homosexual bodies. In Deviant bodies: Critical perspectives on difference in science and popular culture, ed. Terry, Jennifer and Urla, Jacqueline. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Terry, Jennifer. 1999. An American obsession: Science, medicine, and homosexuality in modern society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1988. The weaker seed: The sexist bias of reproductive theory. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 3(1): 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1993. The less noble sex: Scientific, religious and philosophical conceptions of woman's nature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1996a. Fleshing gender, sexing the body: Refiguring the sex/gender distinction, Spindel Conference Proceedings. Southern Journal of Philosophy. Vol. XXXV.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 1996b. Re‐valuing science. In Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, ed. Nelson, Lynn Hankinson and Nelson, Jack. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy. 2001. Material locations: An interactionist alternative to realism/social constructivism, Engendering rationalities, ed. Tuana, Nancy and Morgen, Sandra. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Whipple, Beverly. 1995. Research concerning sexual response in women The Health Psychologist 17(1): 16–18.Google Scholar