Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:53:43.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caring and Exploitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Barbara Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is not wholly clear the extern to which Nel Nodding intends her ethic of caring to be an ethic that stands on its own in competition with others described by ethical theories. I argue that, given this ambiguity, Nodding' ethic of caring is a dangerous ethic because it can abet exploitation. I consider Noddings'responses to this criticism and conclude that the relational ontology of the ethic cannot rescue it from the charges of abetting exploitation.

Type
Review Symposium
Information
Hypatia , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1990 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, Annette. 1985. What do women want in a moral theory? Nous 19 (5): 53–63.10.2307/2215117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96:231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabeck, Mary, ed. Forthcoming. Who cares? London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara and Diller, Ann. 1987. Trusting ourselves to care. Resources for Feminist Research 16 (3).Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. Forthcoming. Prolegomena to future caring. In Who cares? Brabeck, Mary, ed. London: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral éducation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1986. Some answers to questions on ethics of caring. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar