Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:46:20.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Care, Disability, and Violence: Theorizing Complex Dependency in Eva Kittay and Judith Butler

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2014

Stacy Clifford Simplican
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do we theorize the experiences of caregivers abused by their children with autism without intensifying stigma toward disability? Eva Kittay emphasizes examples of extreme vulnerability to overturn myths of independence, but she ignores the possibility that dependents with disabilities may be vulnerable and aggressive. Instead, her work over‐emphasizes caregivers' capabilities and the constancy of disabled dependents' vulnerability. I turn to Judith Butler's ethics and her conception of the self as opaque to rethink care amid conflict. Person‐centered planning approaches, pioneered by disability rights activists, merge Butler's analysis of opacity with Kittay's work on embodied care, while also inviting a broader network of people to both interpret needs and change communities. By expanding our conceptions of dependency, feminist disability studies can continue the aim of both Kittay and Butler: to humanize unintelligible lives.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 30 , Issue 1: Special Issue: New Conversations in Feminist Disability Studies , Winter 2015 , pp. 217 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arneil, Barbara. 2009. Disability, self image, and modern political thought. Political Theory 37 (2): 218–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Bruce L., Blacher, Jan, Crnic, Keith A., and Edelbrock, Craig. 2002. Behavior problems and parenting stress in families of three‐year‐old children with and without developmental delays. American Journal of Mental Retardation 107 (6): 433–44.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, Marian. 2011. Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (2): 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Ann. 2009. The monster inside my son. Salon, March 26. http://www.salon.com/2009/03/26/bauer_autism/ (accessed May 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Bérubé, Michael. 2009. Equality, freedom, and/or justice for all: A response to Martha Nussbaum. Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4): 353–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004a. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004b. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an account of oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Stacy. 2012. Making disability public in deliberative democracy. Contemporary Political Theory 11 (2): 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloyes, Kristin G. 2002. Agonizing care: Care ethics, agonistic feminism and a political theory of care. Nursing Inquiry 9 (3): 203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, Joanna. 2009. Kent State professor Trudy Steuernagel's fierce protection of her autistic son, Sky Walker, costs her life: Sheltering Sky. The Plain Dealer, December 6. http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/12/kent_state_professor_trudy_ste.html (accessed May 15, 2014).Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 2007. “Well, you go there to get off”: Visiting feminist care ethics through a women's bathhouse. Feminist Theory 8 (3): 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanne, Stephen M., and Mazurek, Micah O. 2011. Aggression in children and adolescents with ASD: Prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders 41 (7): 926–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, Christine. 2010. Wrestling with group identity: Disability activism and direct funding. Disability Studies Quarterly 30 (3–4). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1279 (accessed August 25, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Christine. 2013. Building bridges with accessible care: Disability studies, feminist care scholarship, and beyond. Hypatia 28 (4): 784–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2007. Beyond autonomy and paternalism: The caring transparent self. In Autonomy & paternalism: Reflections on the theory and practice of health care, ed. Nye, Thomas, Denier, Yvonne, and Vandevelde, Toon. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2009a. Ideal theory bioethics and the exclusion of people with severe cognitive disabilities. In Naturalized bioethics: Toward responsible knowing and practice, ed. Lindemann, Hilde, Verveck, Marian, and Urban Walker, Margaret. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2009b. The ethics of philosophizing: Ideal theory and the exclusion of people with severe cognitive disabilities. In Feminist ethics and social and political philosophy: Theorizing the non‐ideal, ed. Tessman, Lisa. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2009c. The personal is philosophical is political: A philosopher and mother of a cognitively disabled person sends notes from the battlefield. Metaphilosophy 40 (3–4): 606–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2011. Forever small: The strange case of Ashley X. Hypatia 26 (3): 610–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2013. Why we should care about global caring. In Regulating family responsibilities, ed. Bridgeman, Jo, Keating, Heather, and Lind, Craig. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Lecavilier, Luc, Leone, Sarah, and Wiltz, James. 2006. The impact of behaviour problems on caregiver stress in young people with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50 (3): 172–83.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Moya. 2007. Judith Butler: From norms to politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 2005. Ideal theory as ideology. Hypatia 20 (3): 165–84.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1993. Justice, gender and international boundaries. In The quality of life, ed. Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parens, Erik. 2009. Respecting children with disabilities—and their parents. Hastings Center Report 39 (1): 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearpoint, Jack, O'Brien, John, and Forest, Marsha. 2000. PATH: Planning possible positive futures. Toronto: Inclusion Press.Google Scholar
Pettersen, Tove. 2012. Conceptions of care: Altruism, feminism, and mature care. Hypatia 27 (2): 366–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander‐Staudt, Maureen. 2006. The unhappy marriage of care ethics and virtue ethics. Hypatia 21 (4): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Michael Ashley. 2007. Disability human rights. California Law Review 95 (1): 75–122.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1995. Care as a basis for radical political judgments. Hypatia 10 (2): 141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2010. Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2): 158–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherow, David, and Wetherow, Faye. 2002. Community‐building and commitment‐building with PATH. In Implementing person‐centered planning: Voices of experience, ed. O'Brien, John and O'Brien, Connie L. Toronto, Canada: Inclusion Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, Shiloh. 2011. Dependency relations: Corporeal vulnerability and norms of personhood in Hobbes and Kittay. Hypatia 26 (3): 554–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar