Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T16:05:23.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Jean Keller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While care ethics has frequently been criticized for lacking an account of autonomy, this paper argues that care ethics’ relational model of moral agency provides the basis for criticizing the philosophical tradition's model of autonomy and for rethinking autonomy in relational terms. Using Diana Meyers s account of autonomy competency as a basis, a dialogical model of autonomy is developed that can respond to internal and external critiques of care ethics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1997 , pp. 152 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addelson, Kathryn Pyne. 1991. Autonomy and respect. Ii Impure Thoughts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette. 1994. Moral prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra. 1990. Feeding egos, tending wounds. Ii Femininity and domination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. The generalized and the concrete other. Ii Situating the self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blum, Lawrence. 1993. Gilligan and Kohlberg: Implications for moral theory. Ii An ethic of care. See Larrabee 1993.Google Scholar
Broughton, John M. 1993. Women's rationality and men's virtues: A critique of gender dualism in Gilligan's theory of moral development. Ii An ethic of care. See Larrabee 1993.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1992. Emotional work. Ii Explorations in feminist ethics. See Cole and Coultrap‐McQuin 1992.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1990. Caring and evil. Hypatia 5(1): 101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia, ed. 1991. Feminist ethics. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What can she know? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Eve Browning, and Coultrap‐McQuin, Susan, eds. 1992. Explorations in feminist ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Davion, Victoria. 1991. Integrity and radical change. Ii Feminist ethics. See Card 1991.Google Scholar
Davion, Victoria. 1993. Autonomy, integrity, and care. Ii Social Theory and Practice 19(2): 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1989. Self‐rule in social context: Autonomy from a feminist perspective. Ii Freedom, equality, and social change, ed. Peden, Creighton and Sterba, James P.Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. The social self and the partiality debates. Ii What are friends for? See Friedman 1993.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. What are friends for? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1986. In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. Ii Women and values, ed. Pearsall, Marilyn. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1988. Autonomy and identity in feminist thinking. Ii Feminist perspectives in philosophy, ed. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1990. Some concerns about Nel Noddings' Caring. Hypatia 5(1): 109–14.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1991. Some thoughts about caring. Ii Feminist ethics. See Card 1991.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1992. Lesbian ethics. Palo Alto: Institute of Lesbian Studies.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1990. Caring and exploitation. Hypatia 5(1): 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larrabee, Mary Jeanne, ed. 1993. An ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luria, Zella. 1993. A methodological critique. Ii An ethic of care. See Larrabee 1993.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 1987a. Personal autonomy and the paradox of feminine socialization. The Journal of Philosophy 84(11): 619–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 1987b. The socialized individual and individual autonomy: An intersection between philosophy and psychology. Ii Women and Moral Theory, ed. Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana. 1989. Self, society, and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1986. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1990. A response. Hypatia 5(1): 120–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaltsas, Patricia Ward. 1992. Do feminist ethics counter feminist aims? Ii Explorations in feminist ethics. See Cole and Coultrap‐McQuin 1992.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Susan. 1992. No longer patient. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Margaret Urban. 1992. Moral understandings: Alternative “epistemology” for a feminist ethics. Ii Explorations in feminist ethics. See Cole and Coultrap‐McQuin 1992.Google Scholar