Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:42:13.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women and Language in Susan Griffin's Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

In Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her, Susan Griffin's embedding of language and culture within the natural world implicitly offers a critique of widespread assumptions, shared by many feminists, that language belongs only to the powerful and that it is inherendy violent. Griffin's depiction of the process through which women come to speech is illuminated by V. N. VofosHnov's work on the multiaccentuakty of language and by Trinh Minh'ha's characterizations of oral traditions. Both authors stress the constant re-creation of language by speakers and listeners.

Type
REVIEW ESSAY
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benstock, Shari, ed. 1987. Feminist issues in literary scholarship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, McVicker Clenchy, B., Rule Goldberg, N., and Mattuck Tarule, J. 1987. Women's ways of knowing. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélêne. 1976. The laugh of the Medusa. In New French feminisms. See Elaine Marks and Isabelle Courtrivon 1981.10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems 33(6): 1432.10.2307/800672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gynlecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Diggory, Terence. 1991. William Carlos Williams and the ethics of painting. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400861729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuPlessis, Rachel Blau. 1990. The pink guitar: Writing as feminist practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Griffin, Susan. 1978. Woman and nature: The roaring inside her. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory. Signs 11(4): 645–64.10.1086/494270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedley, Jane. 1992. Surviving to speak new language: Mary Daly and Adrienne Rich. Hypatia 7(2): 4062.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1992.tb00884.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holler, Linda. 1990. Thinking with the weight of the earth: Feminist contributions to an epistemology of concreteness. Hypatia 5(1): 123.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00386.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1977. This sex which is not one. In New French feminisms. See Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtrivon 1981.10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordanova, L. J. 1980. Natural facts: A historical perspective on science and sexuality. In Nature, culture and gender, ed.McCormack, Carol and Strathern, Marilyn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Hilary Mannette. 1989. Marxism, psychoanalysis, and Mother Nature. In Feminist Studies 15(2): 255278.10.2307/3177787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1974. Oscillation between power and denial. In New French feminisms. See Elaine Marks and Isabelle de Courtivron.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1981. Woman's time. Trans. Jardine, Alice and Blake, Harry. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, ed.Keohane, Nannerl O., Rosaldo, Michelle Z., and Gelpi, Barbara C.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macauley, David. 1991. On women, animals and nature: An interview with eco‐feminist Susan Griffin. American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 90(3): 116–27.Google Scholar
Marks, Elaine, and de Courtivron, Isabelle, eds. 1981. New French feminisms. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, and Emerson, Caryl, eds. 1989. Rethinking Ba Wuin: Extensions and challenges. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. 1991. Ground, pivot, motion: Ecofeminist theory, dialogics, and literary practice. Hypatia 6(1): 146–61.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00214.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Patrick D. Forthcoming. Voicing Another Nature. In A dialogue of voices: Feminism and Bakhtin, ed.Hohne, Karen and Wesson, Helen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1988. Feminist theory and the philosophies of man. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rollin, Bernard. 1981. Animal rights and human morality. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Scarry, Elaine, ed. 1988. Literature and the body: Essays on populations and persons. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 1987. Women's time, women's space: Writing the history of feminist criticism. In Feminist issues in literary scholarship, ed.Benstock, Shari. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Wallace. 1957. Opus posthumous. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Trinh, Minh‐ha T. 1989. Woman, native, other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. 1929. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Trans.Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I. R.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, rpt 1986.Google Scholar
Walker, Alice. 1983. In search of our mothers' gardens: Womanist prose. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. 1988. Honey‐mad women: Emancipatory strategies in women's writing. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/yaeg91456CrossRefGoogle Scholar