Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T09:50:41.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Elizabeth Anderson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Lisa Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism: Feminism as Political Critique
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Fall 2009 , pp. 130 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 1998. Pragmatism, science, and moral inquiry. In In the face of the facts: Rethinking moral inquiry in American scholarship, ed. Westbrook, Robert. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, pp. 10–39.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. Recent thinking about sexual harassment: A review essay. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34:284–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: 139–67.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The second‐person standpoint: Morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1910. How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1927. The public and its problems. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Dixon, Travis, and Linz, D. 2000. Overrepresentation and underrepresentation of African Americans and Latinos as lawbreakers on television news. Journal of Communication 50:131–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, Lori, and Schiraldi, Vincent. 2001. Off balance: Youth, race & crime in the news. Washington, D.C.: Building Blocks for Youth.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Nous 34:31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, Don. 1985. Without foundations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 1989. Happy slaves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The metaphysics of morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, Mark, and Nygaard, Ingrid. 1998. Void where prohibited: Rest breaks and the right to urinate on company time. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1967. Two treatises of government. 2d ed. ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria, and Spelman, Elizabeth. 1986. Have we got a theory for you! Feminist theory, cultural imperialism, and the demand for “the woman's voice.” In Women and Values, ed. Pearsall, Marilyn. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1969/1975. The Subjection of women. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles. 1997. The racial contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles‐Louis de Secondat. 1973. Persian letters. Trans. Christopher Betts. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Lisa. 2006. Challenging liberalism: Feminism as political critique. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 2001. Theological‐political treatise. 2nd. ed. ed. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1999. Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar