Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T19:59:42.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surviving to Speak New Language: Mary Daly and Adrienne Rich

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Jane Hedley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As radical feminists seeking to overcome the linguistic oppression of women, Rich and Daly apparently shared the same agenda in the late 1970s; but they approached the problem differently, and their paths have increasingly diverged. Whereas Daly's approach to the repossession of language is code-oriented and totalizing, Rich's approach is open-ended and context-oriented. Rich has therefore addressed more successfully than Daly the problem of language in use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Philosophy and Language , Spring 1992 , pp. 40 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

The American Heritage dictionary of the English language: New college edition. 1976. Ed Morris, William. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. [1966] 1970. Problems in general linguistics, Trans. Meek, Mary Elizabeth. Miami: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter. 1967. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Black, Maria, and Coward, Rosalind. [1981] 1990. Linguistic, social and sexual relations: A review of Dale Spender's Man made language. Screen Education 39 (Summer); Reprinted in The feminist critique of language: A reader, ed. Deborah Cameron. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Black, Max. [195455] 1981. Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 55: 273–94; reprinted in Phibsophical perspectives on metaphor, ed. Mark Johnson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1941. Four master tropes. Kenyan Review 3: 421–38.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1990. Introduction: Why is language a feminist issue? In The feminist critique of language: A reader, ed. Cameron, D.London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1946. Language and myth, Trans. Langer, Suzanne K.New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1973. Beyond God the father: Toward a philosophy of women's liberation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 1984. Pure lust: Elemental feminist philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary, and Caputi, Jane. 1987. Websters’ first new intergalactic wickedary of the English language. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Draine, Betsy. 1989. Refusing the wisdom of Solomon: Some recent feminist literary theory. Signs 15: 144–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1983. Contemporary feminist thought. Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar
Fiorenza, Elizabeth Schussler. 1983. In memory of her: A fetninist theological reconstruction of Christian origins. New York: Crossroad Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Francine Wattman, and Treichler, Paula A. 1989. Language, gender, and professional writing: Theoretical approaches and guidelines for nonsexist usage. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra, and Gubar, Susan. 1979. Shakespeare's sisters: Feminist essays on women poets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. [1960a] 1987. Linguistics and poetics. In Style in language, ed. Sebeok, Thomas A.Cambridge MA: MIT Press;Reprinted in Language in literature, ed. Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. [1960b] 1987. Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Fundamentals of language [with Morris Halle], part 2. The Hague: Mouton. Reprinted in Language in literature. See Jakobson (1960a).Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. [1976] 1987. What is poetry? Trans. Heim, Michael. In Semiotics of art: Prague school contributions, ed. Matejka, Ladislav and IrwinTitunik, . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976;. Reprinted in Language in literature, 368–78. See Jakobson (1960a).Google Scholar
Langer, Suzanne K. 1942. Phibsophy in a new key. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Meaghan. [1982] 1988. A‐mazing grace: Notes on Mary Daly's poetics. Intervention 16;. Reprinted in Morris, The pirate's fiancee: Feminism, reading, postmodernism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nilsen, Alleen Pace. 1984. Winning the great he/she battle. College English 46: 151–57. The Oxford English dictionary, 2d ed. 1989. Ed. J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1978. The dream of a common language: Poems 1974–1977. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. On lies, secrets, and silence: Selected prose 1966–1978. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1981a. What does separatism mean? Sinister Wisdom 18 (Fall): 83–91.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1981b. A wild patience has taken me this far: Poems 1978–1981. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1985. The fact of a doorframe: Poems selected and new 1950–1984. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1989. Time's power: Poems 1985–1988. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. [1978] 1981. The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry 5: 143–59; reprinted in Philosophical perspectives on metaphor, ed. Mark Johnson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar