Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:51:58.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standpoint Theory and the Possibility of Justice: A Lyotardian Critique of the Democratization of Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Margret Grebowicz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Grebowicz argues from the perspective of Jean-François Lyotard's critique of deliberative democracy that the project of democratizing knowledge may bring us closer to terror than to justice. The successful formulation of a critical standpoint requires that we figure the political as itself a contested site, and incorporate this into our theorizing about the role of dissent in the production of knowledges. This essay contrasts Lyotard's notion of the differend with Chantal Mouffe's agonistic model.

Type
Radical Interventions
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Democratic Theory , Fall 2007 , pp. 16 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Derrida, Jacques. 2005. The other of democracy. In Rogues. Trans. Brault, Pascale‐Anne and Naas, Michael. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul. 2001. The conquest of abundance: A tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Robert, and Harding, Sandra, eds. 2003. Science and other cultures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1996. Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity? In Feminism and science, ed. Keller, Evelyn Fox and Longino, Helen E. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2003a. A world of sciences. In Science and other cultures, ed. Figueroa, and Harding, .Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 2003b. The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 2002. The fate of knowledge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1993. A bizarre partner. In Postmodern fables. Trans. van Den Abbeele, Georges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François, and Thébaud, Jean‐Loup. 1985. Just gaming. Trans. Godzich, Wlad. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Readings, Bill. 1982. Introducing Lyotard: Art and politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solomon, Miriam. 2001. Social empiricism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2003. Why standpoint matters. In Science and other cultures, ed. Figueroa, and Harding, .Google Scholar