Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:06:22.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resisting Definition: Gendering through Interaction and Relational Selfhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Alexis Shotwell  and
Trevor Sangrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that trans and genderqueer people affect the gender formation and identity of non-trans people. We explore three instances of this relationship between trans and non-trans genders: an allegiance to inadequate liberal-individualist models of selfhood; tropes through which trans people are made to stand as theoretical objects with which to think about gender broadly; and a narrow focus on gender and evasion of an intersectional understanding of gender formation.

Type
Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities
Information
Hypatia , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Transgender Studies and Feminism: Theory, Politics, and Gendered Realities , Summer 2009 , pp. 56 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, Harry. 2001. Standards of care. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 13 (1): 1–30. Available at http://www.wpath.org/ (accessed January 30, 2009).Google Scholar
Brison, Susan. 2002. Aftermath: Violence and the remaking of a self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brownfemipower. 2007. One more bitchy note before I put on my happy face and wish you a great holiday break. Available athttp://brownfemipower.com/archives/764 (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 2007. Body shame, body pride: Lessons from the disability rights movement. Available at http://eliclare.com/presentations/lectures/shame‐pride/ (accessed October 25, 2008).Google Scholar
Colapinto, John. 2000. As nature made him: The boy who was raised as a girl. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective. 2000. A black feminist statement. In Let nobody turn us around, ed. Marable, Manning, and Mullings, Leith. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 524–528.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela Y. 1983. Women, race, and class. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Findlay, Barbara. 2006. Acting queerly: Lawyering for trans people. In Trans/forming feminisms: Trans/feminist voices speak out, ed. Scott‐Dixon, Krista. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 145–153.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ed. 1980. Herculine Barbin: Being the recently discovered memoirs of a nineteenth century French hermaphrodite. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2003. Feminist solidarity after queer theory: The case of transgender. Signs: Journal of Woman in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1093–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 2002. Ftm transsexualism and grief. Available athttp://feminist‐reprise.org/docs/jeffreysftm.htm (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Koyama, Emi. 2006. Whose feminism is it anyway?: The unspoken racism of the trans inclusion debate. In The transgender studies reader, ed. Stryker, Susan and Whittle, Stephen. New York: Routledge, pp. 698–705.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Karla. 2000. Men in ewes’ clothing: The stealth politics of the transgender movement. Available athttp://www.questioningtransgender.org/stealth.html (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
maribelle. 2006. Any excuse to denigrate lipstick (comment). Available athttp://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com/2006/12/15/any‐excuse‐to‐denigrate‐lipstick/ (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Meza, Maria, and Mitchell, Nick. 2007. Will the down low brothas please come out? Historicism, homonormativity, and queer political formations conference. May 12, 2007. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Namaste, Vivian K. 2005. Sex change, social change: Reflections on identity, institutions and imperialism. Toronto: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Sylvia. 2002. Queens in exile, the forgotten ones. In Genderqueer, ed. Nestle, Claire Howell Joan and Wilchins, Riki. Los Angeles: Alyson Publications, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
Serano, Julia. 2007. Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Emeryville, Calif.: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Spade, Dean. 2004. Once more … with feeling. In From the inside out, ed. Diamond, M.San Francisco: Manic D Press, 94–98.Google Scholar
Towle, Evan B., and Morgan, Lynn M. 2002. Romancing the transgender native: Rethinking the use of the “third gender” concept. GLQ 8 (4): 469–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uppity Biscuit. 2007. Do not call me cisgender. You do not have my permission to name me. Available athttp://uppitybiscuit.wordpress.com/2007/01/19/do‐not‐call‐me‐cisgender‐you‐do‐not‐have‐my‐permission‐to‐name‐me/ (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
Vachon, Wolfgang. 2006. Transforming values/engendering policy. In Trans/forming feminisms: Trans/feminist voices speak out, ed. Scott‐Dixon, Krista. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 227–234.Google Scholar
Vogel, Lisa. 2006. Michigan Women's Music Festival sets the record “straight.” Available athttp://womensspace.wordpress.com/2006/08/22/michigan‐womyns‐music‐festival‐sets‐the‐record‐straight/ (accessed August 23, 2008).Google Scholar
White, Caroline. 2002. Re/defining gender and sex: Educating for trans, transsexual, and intersex access and inclusion to sexual assault centres and transition houses. Master's thesis. University of British Columbia. Available athttp://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Transition_and_Crossdressing_Service_Delivery__A_Review.pdf (accessed January 30, 2009).Google Scholar