We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Astell, Mary. 1996. Astell: Political writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1946. Littérature et métaphysique. In321: 1153–63.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. 1994. The .blazing world and other writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Conway, Anne. 16901996. The principles of the most ancient and modern philosophy. Trans. Coudert, Allison P. and Course, Taylor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Masham, Damaris. 1696. A discourse concerning the love of God. London: Awnsham and John Churchil.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1958. The “Litre de la paix” of Christine de Pisan, ed. Willard, Charity Cannon. S‐Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1983. The book of the city of ladies. Trans. Richards, Earl Jeffrey. London: Picador.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1984. The epistle of the prison of human life with an epistle to the queen of France and lament on the evils of the civil war. Trans. Wiseman, Josette. London: Garland Library of Medieval Literature.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1990. Christine de Pizan's letter of Othea to Hector. Trans. Chance, Jane. New‐buryport, Mass.: Focus Information Group.Google Scholar
de Pizan, Christine. 1994. The book of the body politic. Trans. Forhan, Kate. In Cambridge texts in the history Of political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchon, Gabriel. 1693. Traité de la morale et de la politique, divisé en trois parties: savoir, la liberté & I'auturité, oú I'on voit que les presonnes d'un sexe, pour en être privées, ne laissent pas d'avoir une capacité naturelle qui pent les en render participants: avec un petit traité de la foiblesse, de la légèrete & de I'inconstance qu'on leur attribu mal‐àpropos. Lyon: B. Vignien.Google Scholar