Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:29.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questions to Luce Irigaray

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Kate Ince
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article traces the “dialogue” between the work of the philosophers Luce Irigaray and Emmanuel Levinas. It attempts to construct a more nuanced discussion than has been given to date of Irigaray's critique of Levinas, particularly as formulated in “Questions to Emmanuel Levinas” (Irigaray 1991)-It suggests that the concepts of the feminine and of voluptuosity articulated by Levinas have more to contribute to Irigaray's project of an ethics of sexual difference than she herself sometimes appears to think.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 122 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthowski, Frances. 1980. Feminism and deconstruction: A union forever deferred. Enclitic 4(2): 70–77.Google Scholar
Burke, Carolyn. 1987. Romancing the philosophers: Luce Irigaray. The Minnesota Review 29: 103–14.Google Scholar
Chalier, Catherine. 1982. Figures du féminin. Lecture d'Emmanuel Levinas. Paris: La nuit surveillée.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1988. Feminism and the other. In The provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the other, ed. Bernasconi, Robert and David, . New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1990. The alterity and immodesty of time: Death as future and eras as feminine in Levinas. In Writing the future, ed. David, . New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 1995. Ethics of eros: Irigaray's rewriting of the philosophers. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon. 1992. The ethics of deconstruction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Violence and metaphysics. In Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Choreographies. Interview with Christie V. McDonald. Diacritics 12(2): 66–76.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1987a. The post card: From Socrates to Freud and beyond. Trans. Alan, . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1987b. Women in the beehive: A seminar with Jacques Derrida. In Men in feminism, ed. Jardine, Alice and Paul, . New York and London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1991. At this very moment in this work here I am. Trans. Ruben Berezdivin. In Rereading Levinas, ed. Bernasconi, Robert and Simon, . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions: Three French feminists. Boston and Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, Marian. 1987. History traces. In Post‐structuralism and the question of history, ed. Attridge, Derek, Bennington, Geoff and Robert, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ince, Kate. 1993. Deconstructing difference: Sexuality and love in contemporary French literature and philosophy. Unpublished DPhil thesis. University of Sussex, Brighton, England, 1993.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1980. Amante marine de Friedrich Nietzsche. Paris: Minuit. Marine lover of Friedrich Nietzsche. Trans. Gill, Gillian C.New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1982. Passions elementaires. Paris: Minuit. Elemental passions. Trans. Joanne Collie and Judith Still. New York and London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1983. L'oubli de I'air: chez Martin Heidegger. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1990. Questions à Emmanuel Levinas. Sur la divinité de l'amour. Critique 522: 911–20.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1991. Questions to Emmanuel Levinas. Trans. Margaret Whitford. In The Irigaray reader, ed. Margaret, . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993a. An ethics of sexual difference. Trans. Burke, Carolyn and Gill, Gillian C.Ithaca: Cornell University Press; London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993b. The fecundity of the caress: A reading of Levinas, Totality and infinity, “Phenomenology of eros.” In An ethics of sexual difference. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; London: Athlone.Google Scholar
This essay first appeared in French in Exerrices de la patience 5(Spring 1983): 119–37,.and in English in a translation by Carolyn Burke in Face to face with Levinas, ed. Richard A. Cohen. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1986.Google Scholar
This essay first appeared in French 1993c. Je, tu, nous: Toward a culture of difference. Trans. Alison, . New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Trans. Alphonso, . Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Le temps et l'autre. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise than being, or, beyond essence. Trans. Alphonso, . The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1985. Ethics and infinity. Trans. Cohen, Richard A.Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1989. Time and the other. Trans. Richard A. Cohen. In The Levinas reader, ed. Sean, . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1990. Difficult freedom. Trans. Sean, . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press;. London: Athlone. Whitford, Margaret. 1991. Luce Irigaray: Philosophy in the feminine. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar