Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:54:15.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Millett's Rationalist Error

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Ross Elliot Eddington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Millett's condemnation of Ruskin in Sexual Politics (1977) to demonstrate that Ruskin's views on women are the product of a specific mode of experience—one that precludes his views being representative of traditional Victorian patriarchy. The article uses Oakeshott's philosophical framework of different modes of experience to illustrate that Millett narrowly interprets Ruskin's statements on women from her own modal perspective without considering his broader belief in the imaginative over the rational faculty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Women, Art, and Aesthetics , Fall 2003 , pp. 193 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, Dinah. 1981. Ruskin and the science of Proserpina in New Approaches to Ruskin, ed. Hewison, Robert. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Birch, Dinah. 1988. Ruskin's womanly mind. Essays in criticism 38: 308–24.Google Scholar
Birch, Dinah. 1989. Ethics of the dust: Ruskin's authorities. Prose Studies 12(2): 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, Dinah. 1998. What teachers do you give your girls? Paper presented at Ruskin Seminar, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Birch, Dinah. 2002. Ruskin and Gender. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossche, Chris. 1992. The queen of the garden/The woman of the streets: Separate spheres and the inscription of gender. Journal of Pre-Raphaelite Studies 1(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Brock‐Utne, Birgit. 1985. Educating for peace: A feminist perspective. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bullen, J. 1995. Ruskin, Venice and the construction of femininity. RES New Series 46(184): 502–20.Google Scholar
Burd, Van Akin. ed. 1973. The Ruskin family letters: the correspondence of John James Ruskin, his wife and their son, John, 1801–1843. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cixous, Helene. 1988. The laugh of the Medusa. Quoted in Susan Sellers, ed 1988. Writing Differences: Readings from the Seminar of Helene Cixous, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 47–150.Google Scholar
Cook, EX, and Wedderburn, Alexander. eds. 19031912. The complete works of John Ruskin, 39 vols. Library ed. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Eddington, Ross. 1999. The alterity of the imagination: The effect of John Ruskin's imaginative usage of classical sources on his participation within the politico‐economic discourse. Ph.D. diss. University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Emerson, Sheila. 1993. Ruskin: The genesis of invention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1991. Feminism and philosophy: Perspectives on difference and equality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Mahatma. 1982. An autobiography: or the story of my experiments with truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Helsinger, Elizabeth, Sheets, Robin and Veeder, William. 1983. The woman question: Defining voices, 1837–1883. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Hewison, Robert. 1996. Ruskin and Oxford: The art of education. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horace, . 1885. The Epistles of Horace. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Jennifer. 1995. Raising lilies: Ruskin and women. Journal of British Studies 34: 325–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, and Mill, Harriet Taylor. 1970. Essays on sex equality. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milieu, Kate. 1977. Sexual politics. New York: Abacus.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thais ed., 1990. Victorian sages and cultural discourse: Renegotiating gender and power. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Nord, Deborah. 1988. Mill and Ruskin on the woman question revisited. In Engell, James and Perkins, David eds., Teaching literature: What is needed now? London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1933. Experience and its modes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. Rationalism in politics and other essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan, and Mansbridge, Jane. eds. 1994. Feminism. Aldershot: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Patmore, Coventry. 1898. The angel in the house. London: Cassell and Company.Google Scholar
Reardon, Betty. 1993. Women and peace: Feminist visions of global security. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1849. The seven lamps of architecture. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. VIII. Library ed., 3–267. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1865. Sesame and lilies. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XVIII. Library ed., 21–192. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1866. Ethics of the dust. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XVIII. Library ed., 209–372. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1869. The queen of the air. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XIX. Library ed., 291–420. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 18713. Fors clavigera. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXVII. Library ed., 291–420. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1872. The eagle's nest. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXII. Library ed., 123–292. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 18731881. Loves meinie. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXV. Library ed., 11–150. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 18751883. Deucalion. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXVI. Library ed., 95–360. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 18751886. Proserpina. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXV. Library ed., 197–539. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. ed. 1876. The “Economist” of Xenophon. Trans. Alexander Wedderburn and W.G. Collingwood. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXXI. Library ed., 197–539. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Ruskin, John. 1883. Francesca's book. In The complete works of John Ruskin. 1903–1912. Edited by Cook, E. and Wedderburn, A., Vol. XXXII. Library ed., 535. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Paul. 1990. Ruskin and the matriarchal logos. In Morgan, Thais, ed. Victorian sages and cultural discourse: Renegotiating gender and power. London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Paul. 1995. Ruskiris poetic argument: The design of the major works. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Bernard. 1921. Ruskin's politics. Oxford: Ruskin Centenary Council.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, Nicholas. 1976. Economic, social and literary influences upon the development of Ruskin's ideas in Unto this last. Master's thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Sonstroem, David. 1971. John Ruskin and the nature of manliness. The Victorian Newsletter. (Fall): 14–17.Google Scholar
Sonstroem, David. 1977. Millett vs Ruskin: A defense of Ruskin's “Of Queens’ Gardens.” Victorian Studies (spring): 283–97.Google Scholar
Spear, Jeffrey. 1984. Dreams of an English eden: Ruskin and his tradition in social criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltman, Sharon. 1998. Ruskin's mythic queens: Gender subversion in Victorian culture. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Weltman, Sharon. 1999. Myth and gender in Ruskin's science. In Birch, Dinah, ed. Ruskin and the dawn of the modern. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Woman's rights and duties, 2 vols. 1840. London: Parker.Google Scholar