Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:50:52.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Male Lesbians and the Postmodernist Body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

This essay explores the criteria for lesbian identity attribution through the case study of “male lesbians”: biological males who claim to be lesbians. I analyze such sexlgender identity attribution through the lens of postmodernism, which provides a workable theoretical framework for “male lesbian” identities. My conclusions explore the historicity and cultural constructedness of the body's sexlgender identities, revealing the limitations of both “the postmodemized body” and “the essentialized modernist body.”

Type
CONSTRUCTING “LESBIAN”
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, Ti Grace. 1974. Amazon odessy. New York: Links Books.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1990. Feminism, postmodernism, and gender‐skepticism. In Feminism and postmodernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Kate. 1991. Transsexual lesbian playwright tells all In High risk, ed. Scholder, Amy and Silberberg, Ira, New York: Plume Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of community. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlson, Alison. 1991. When is a woman not a woman? Women's Sports and Fitness. March: 2429.Google ScholarPubMed
Clausen, Jan. 1990. My interesting condition. Out/look, Winter: 1021.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. History of sexuality: Vol. I, An introduction, trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Herculine Barbin: Being the recently discovered memoirs of the nineteenth century French hermaphrodite, trans. McDougal, Richard. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Halperin, David. 1990. One hundred years of homosexuality and European Greek love. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoagland, Sarah Lucia. 1988. Lesbian ethics: Toward new value. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Lesbian Studies.10.1016/0277-5395(88)90107-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, Ashby. 1992. Festival forum. Lesbian Connection 14(4): 1112.Google Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne, and McKenna, Wendy. 1978. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Myles, Eileen. 1990. Gender play. Outweek 5 Dec: 4849.Google Scholar
Nestle, Joan. 1987. A Restricted country. New York: Firebrand.Google Scholar
Oches, Robin. 1990. A letter to the editor. Out/look Summer.Google Scholar
Olano, Pamela J. 1992. Throw over your man, I say, and come: Reading Virginia Woolf as a lesbian. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Penelope, Julia. 1986. Hetersexual semantics: “Just two kinds of people in the world.” Lesbian Ethics Fall: 5880.Google Scholar
Penelope, Julia. 1990. The partriarchal universe of discourse. In Speaking freely: Unlearning the lies of the father tongue, ed. Penelope, Julia. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Radicalesbians, . 1971. The woman‐identified woman. In Notes from the third year: Women's liberation, ed. Koedt, Anne, Rapone, Anita, and Levine, Ellen. New York: Radical Feminist.Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, John. 1990. Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. New York: Firebrand.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan. 1986. (Re)writing the body: The politics of female eroticism. In The female body in Western culture, ed. Suleiman, Susan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wings, Mary. 1990. A letter to the editor. Out/look Summer.Google Scholar