Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:39:27.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboring Women, Coaching Men: Masculinity and Childbirth Education in the Contemporary United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Carine M. Mardorossian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hospitals have adopted a rhetoric of family-centered maternity care, and one of the ways in which they show their commitment to it is through the integration of the husband-as-coach model of childbirth (the Bradley method) into delivery practices. I argue that this model's widespread popularity testifies less to the culture's endorsement of a woman-centered approach than to healthcare's appropriation of “natural” childbirth as a site for the production and reproduction of patriarchal and capitalist power.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Women, Art, and Aesthetics , Fall 2003 , pp. 113 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arms, Suzanne. 1975. Immaculate deception: A new look at women and childbirth in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Barclay, Lesley, Donovan, Jenny, and Genovese, Ann. 1996. Men's experiences during their partner's first pregnancy: A grounded theory analysis. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 13(3): 12–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Beech, Beverley Lawrence. 2000. The safety of hospital birth: The myth versus the reality. AIMS Journal 11(4): 1–2.Google Scholar
Berry, Linda M. 1988. Realistic expectations of the labor coach. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 17(5): 354–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bordo, Susan R. 1997. Twilight zones: The hidden life of cultural images from Plato to O. J. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Robert. 1965. Husband‐coached childbirth. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Bruce, Elizabeth. 2001. Saying no to episiotomy: Getting through labor and delivery in one piece. Mothering January‐February: 54.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Rout‐ledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rona, and MacFarlane, Alison. 1986. Place of delivery: A review. British Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecology 93(7): 675–83.Google Scholar
Davis‐Floyd, Robbie E. 1998. Ritual in the hospital: Giving birth the American way. Birth Gazette 14(4): 12–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Donovan, Jenny. 1995. The process of analysis during a grounded study of men during their partners’ pregnancies. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21(4): 708–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duden, Barbara. 1993. Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, Mark A. 1992. The safety of home birth: The farm study. American Journal of Public Health 82(3): 450–53.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vol. 1. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Haire, Doris. 1999. Focal point on childbirth education: A history of childbirth education. International Journal of Childbirth Education 12(4): 26–28.Google Scholar
Howe, Keith A. 1988. Home Births in South‐West Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 149(6): 296–97, 300, 302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johanson, Richard, Newburn, Mary, and Macfarlane, Alison. 2002. Has the medicalization of childbirth gone too far? (education and debate). British Medical Journal 324(7342): 892–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Martin P. 2002. An exploration of men's experience and role at childbirth. The Journal of Men's Studies 10(2): 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmel, Margaret. 1959. Thank you, Dr. Lamaze: A mother's experience in painless childbirth. Philadelphia: B. Lippincott Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Kennell, John, Klaus, Marshall, McGrath, Susan, Robertson, Steven, and Hinkley, Clark. 1991. Continuous emotional support during labor in a U.S. hospital: A randomized controlled trial., JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association 265(17): 2197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Sheila. 1995. Ourselves as mothers: The universal experience of motherhood. New York: Addison‐Welsley.Google Scholar
Lothian, Judith A. 1995. Home birth: How can the information be included in class?” The Journal of Perinatal Education 4(1): v‐vi.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. 1987. The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Midmer, Deana. 1992. Does family‐centered maternity care empower women? The development of the woman‐centered childbirth model. Family Medicine 24(3): 216–21.Google ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, Mary. 1981. The politics of reproduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olsen, Ole. 1997. Meta‐analysis of the safety of home birth.” Birth 24(1): 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paglia, Camille. 1992. Sex, art, and American culture: Essays. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, Celeste R. 1999. Family centered maternity care: Past, present, future.” International Journal of Childbirth Education 14(4): 6–11.Google Scholar
Reid, Maire. 1997. The disappearance of birth: Language versus reality in modern childbirth. Birth Gazette 13(1): 15–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Rich, Adrienne. 1976. Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Sargent, Lydia ed., 1981. Women and revolution: A discussion of the unhappy marriage of marxism and feminism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1992. Experience. In Feminists theorize the political, ed. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sears, William, and Sears, Martha. 1993. The baby book: Everything you need to know about your baby—from birth to age two. New York: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Simkin, Penny. 1999. Labor support: Where has it been and where is it going? International Journal of Childbirth Education 12(4): 22–23.Google Scholar
Stanworth, Michelle. 1997. Reproductive technologies: Tampering with nature? In Feminisms, ed. Kemp, Sandra and Squires, Judith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Suzanne, Kruckman, Laurence, and Steinberg, Stephanie. 2000. Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada. Social Science and Medicine 50(9): 1257–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tew, Marjorie. 1986. Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer?” British Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecology 93(7): 659–74.Google Scholar
Tew, Marjorie. 1990. Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tew, Marjorie, and Damstra‐Wijmenga, S. 1991. Safest birth attendants: Recent Dutch evidence. Midwifery 7(2): 55–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vehvilainen‐Julkunen, Katri, and Liukkonen, Anja. 1998. Fathers’ experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 14(1): 10–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, Karen. 2000. The Bradley method.” International Journal of Childbirth Education 11(1): 9–10.Google Scholar
Weedon, Chris. 1999. Feminism, theory, and the politics of difference. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Wertz, Richard W., and Wertz, Dorothy C. 1989. Lying in: A history of childbirth in America. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wickham, Sara. 1999. Homebirth: What are the issues? Midwifery Today Summer (50): 16–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Wolf, Naomi. 2001. (Mis)conceptions: Truth, lies, and the unexpected on the journey to motherhood. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar