Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-xrnlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T22:16:25.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Just War and the Problem of Evil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

In this essay, Robin May Schott criticizes leading proponents of just war theory and introduces the notion of justifiable but illegitimate violence. Instead of legitimating some wars as just, it is better to acknowledge that both the situation of war and moral judgments about war are ambiguous. Schott raises the questions: What are alternative narratives of war? And what are alternative narratives to war? Such narratives are necessary for addressing the concepts of evil and of witnessing in the ethical discourse after Auschwitz.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Remnants of Auschwitz. Trans. Heller‐Roazen, Daniel. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Améry, Jean. 1999. At the mind's limit. Trans. Rosenfeld, Sidney and Rosenfeld, Stella P.London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. Origins of totalitarianism New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Beevor, Antony. 2002. Berlin: The downfall, 1945. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The rights of others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1999. Groping through gray zones. In On feminist ethics and politics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar
Coker, Christopher. 2004. The future of war. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copjec, Joan. 1996. Introduction: Evil in the time of the finite world. In Radical evil, ed. Copjec, Joan. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean BethkeHauerwas, StanleyNusseibeh, SariWalzer, Michael, and Weigel, George. 1992. But was it just? Reflections on the morality of the Persian Gulf War. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke ed. 1992a. Just war theory. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, ed. 1992b. Just war as politics: What the Gulf War told us about contemporary American life. In But was it just? ed. Elshtain, et al. 1992.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, ed. 2003. Just war against terror. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. 1992. Testimony. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Girard, René. 1995. Violence and the sacred. Trans. Gregory, Patrick. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jan. 2004. Silence = Rape. The Nation, March 8.Google Scholar
Holmes, Robert L. 1989. On war and morality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Jerry. 2003. U.S. will provide no estimate of Iraqi war casualties. World Socialist Web Site, April 28. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/apr2003/casu‐a28.shtml.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 2003. War and modernity. Trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner. 1992. Threat, values, and defense: Does the defense of values by force remain a moral possibility? In Just war theory, ed. Elshtain, 1992a.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1784/1983. Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan intent. In Perpetual peace and other essays. Trans. Humphrey, Ted. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1793/1996. Religion within the boundaries of mere reason. In Religion and rational theology, ed. Wood, and Giovanni, Di.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1795/1983. To perpetual peace; A philosophical sketch. In Perpetual peace and other essays. Trans. Humphrey, Ted. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1798/1996. The conflict of the faculties. In Religion and rational theology, ed. Wood, and Giovanni, Di.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. Some questions regarding the conceptual history of “crisis.” In The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts. Trans. Presner, Todd, Behnke, Kerstin, and Welge, Jobst. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krystal, Henry ed. 1968. Massive psychic trauma. New York: International Universities.Google Scholar
Langer, Monika. 2003. Beauvoir and Merleau‐Ponty on ambiguity. In The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, Claudia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritterband, Olly. 1998. Ét ord er et skrig. Copenhagen: Aschehoug Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1993. Notes toward a feminist peace politics. In Gendering war talk, ed. Cooke, Miriam and Woollacott, Angela. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May. 2003. Discovering feminist philosophy. Knowledge, ethics, politics. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May. 2007. From radical evil to perpetual peace. In Introduktion til Kant, ed. Nielsen, Carsten Fogh. Århus: Århus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1992. Just and unjust wars. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 2004. Arguing about war. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. 1998. Kant's project for perpetual peace. In Cosmopolitics, ed. Cheah, Pheng and Robbins, Bruce. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, and Di Giovanni, George. 1996. Religion and rational theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Power, violence, and legitimacy: A reading of Hannah Arendt in an age of police brutality and humanitarian intervention. In Breaking the cycles of hatred, ed. Minow, Martha and Rosenblum, Nancy L.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar