Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:26:14.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Many Epistemologies Should Guide the Production of Scientific Knowledge? A Response to Maffie, Mendieta, and Wylie

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sandra Harding
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium Sandra Harding's Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues
Information
Hypatia , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 212 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, Ulrich. 1997. The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Biagioli, Mario, ed. 1999. The science studies reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clough, Sharon. 2001. Thinking globally, progressing locally: Harding and Goonatilake on global science. Social Epistemology 15 (4): 379–83.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Robert, and Harding, Sandra, eds. 2003. Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1987. How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Michael, et al. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh. 1996. Nuclear weapons testing: Scientific experiment as political ritual. In Naked science: Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power, and knowledge, ed. Nader, Laura. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hackett, Edward J.et al., eds. 2007. The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2006. Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2008. Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcoloniatialies, and modernities. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 1993. The “racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra, and Narayan, Uma, eds. 2000. Decentering the center. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Maffie, James. ed. 2001. Truth from the perspective of comparative world philosophy. Social Epistemology 15 (4): 263–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffie, James, ed. 2003. To walk in balance: An encounter between contemporary Western science and Conquest‐era Nahua philosophy. In Figueroa, and Harding, , Science and other cultures.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1969. The grand titration: Science and society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Noble, David. 1995. The religion of technology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga, Scott, Peter, and Gibbons, Michael. 2001. Re‐thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore. 1995. Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Selin, Helene, ed. 1997. Encyclopedia of the history of science, technology, and medicine in non‐Western cultures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snively, Gloria, and Corsiglia, John. 2001. Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education 85: 6–34.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson‐Verran, Helen, and Turnbull, David. 1995. Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. Jasanoff, Sheilaet al. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 2003. Why standpoint matters. In Figueroa and Harding, Science and other cultures.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. 1969. Giordano Bruno and the hermetic tradition. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar