Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
CONKLIN, BETH A.
and
MORGAN, LYNN M.
1996.
Babies, Bodies, and the Production of Personhood in North America and a Native Amazonian Society.
Ethos,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 4,
p.
657.
Croissant, Jennifer
Campbell, John Angus
Jennings, Richard C.
Hudson, Robert G.
Rosen, Paul
Layne, Linda L.
Bal, Roland
and
Raina, Dhruv
1998.
Book review.
Social Epistemology,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
153.
Layne, Linda L.
1999.
Fertility, gender, and health: Contributions toward a comparative anthropology of reproduction.
Reviews in Anthropology,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Porter, Elisabeth
1999.
Bodies, selves, and moral responsibilities.
Women's Studies International Forum,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Layne, Linda L.
2000.
The Cultural Fix: An Anthropological Contribution to Science and Technology Studies.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
352.
Layne, Linda L.
2000.
The Cultural Fix: An Anthropological Contribution to Science and Technology Studies.
Science, Technology, & Human Values,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
492.
Bliton, Mark J.
2001.
Handbook of Phenomenology and Medicine.
Vol. 68,
Issue. ,
p.
393.
Bliton, Mark J.
and
Zaner, Richard M.
2001.
Over the Cutting Edge: How Ethics Consultation Illuminates the Moral Complexity of Open-Uterine Fetal Repair of Spina Bifida and Patients’ Decision Making.
The Journal of Clinical Ethics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 4,
p.
346.
Mullin, Amy
2002.
Pregnant bodies, pregnant minds.
Feminist Theory,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
27.
Bliton, Mark J
2003.
Ethics: “life before birth” and moral complexity in maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida.
Clinics in Perinatology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
449.
Holc, Janine P.
2004.
The Purest Democrat: Fetal Citizenship and Subjectivity in the Construction of Democracy in Poland.
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
755.
Mullin, Amy
2005.
Reconceiving Pregnancy and Childcare.
Bliton, Mark J
2005.
Parental Hope Confronting Scientific Uncertainty: A Test of Ethics in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Spina Bifida.
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3,
p.
595.
Pfeffer, Naomi
2008.
What British women say matters to them about donating an aborted fetus to stem cell research: A focus group study.
Social Science & Medicine,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 12,
p.
2544.
Wilkin, Rebecca
2008.
Descartes, Individualism, and the Fetal Subject.
differences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
96.
Stormer, Nathan
2008.
Looking in Wonder: Prenatal Sublimity and the Commonplace “Life”.
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
647.
Hashiloni‐Dolev, Yael
and
Weiner, Noga
2008.
New reproductive technologies, genetic counselling and the standing of the fetus: views from Germany and Israel.
Sociology of Health & Illness,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 7,
p.
1055.
Keane, Helen
2009.
Foetal personhood and representations of the absent child in pregnancy loss memorialization.
Feminist Theory,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 2,
p.
153.
Beynon-Jones, Siân M.
2012.
Timing is everything: The demarcation of ‘later’ abortions in Scotland.
Social Studies of Science,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
53.
Mansfield, Becky
2012.
Gendered Biopolitics of Public Health: Regulation and Discipline in Seafood Consumption Advisories.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 4,
p.
588.