Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:50:55.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educating Jouy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Shelley Tremain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The feminist charge that Michel Foucault's work in general and his history of sexuality in particular are masculinist, sexist, and reflect male biases vexes feminist philosophers of disability who believe his claims about (for instance) the constitution of subjects, genealogy, governmentality, discipline, and regimes of truths imbue their feminist analyses of disability and ableism with complexity and richness, as well as inspire theoretical sophistication and intellectual rigor in the fields of philosophy of disability and disability studies more generally. No aspect of Foucault's corpus has been more consistently subjected to the charges of masculinism and male bias than his example of the nineteenth‐century farmhand Charles Jouy who, at about forty years of age, engaged in sexual activity with a girl, Sophie Adam, was reported to authorities, and subsequently was incarcerated in Maréville for the rest of his days. My central aim in this paper is to interrupt the momentum of the accepted feminist interpretation of the Jouy case by advancing a feminist perspective on Jouy's identity and the incidents involving Jouy and Adam that takes seriously insights derived from philosophy of disability and critical disability theory and history.

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 801 - 817
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1996. Dangerous pleasures: Foucault and the politics of pedophilia. In Feminist interpretations of Foucault, ed. Hekman, Susan J.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bonnet, H., and Bulard, J. 1868. Rapport medico‐légal sur l'état mental de Charles‐Joseph Jouy, inculpé d'attendats aux mœurs. Nancy.Google Scholar
Davidson, Arnold I. 2003. Introduction to Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–75 by Michel Foucault. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Desjardins, Michel. 2012. The sexualized child: Parents and the politics of “voluntary” sterilization of people labeled intellectually disabled. In Sex and disability, ed. McRuer, Robert and Hollow, Anna. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, Françoise, and Fontana, Alessandro. 2003. Foreword to Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–75 by Michel Foucault. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1985. The history of sexuality, volume 2: The use of pleasure. Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2003. Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–75. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2006. Psychiatric power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–74. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Gill, Michael. 2012. Sex can wait, masturbate: The politics of masturbation training. Sexualities 15 (3/4): 472–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1995. The looping effects of human kinds. In Causal cognition: An interdisciplinary approach, ed. Sperber, D., Premack, D. and Premack, A.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 351–83.Google Scholar
Krafft‐Ebing, Richard von. 1886/2011. Psychopathia sexualis: The classic study of deviant sex. New York: Arcade Books.Google Scholar
Laqueur, Thomas. 2003. Solitary sex: A cultural history of masturbation. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
McWhorter, Ladelle. 2009. Racism and sexual oppression in Anglo‐America: A genealogy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Oksala, Johanna. 2011. Sexual experience: Foucault, phenomenology, and feminist theory. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 26 (1): 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawicki, Jana. 2005. Review of Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–75 by Michel Foucault. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews: An Electronic Journal. http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/23977-abnormal-lectures-at-the-college-de-france-1974-1975/ (accessed October 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Taylor, Chloë. 2009. Foucault, feminism, and sex crimes. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 24 (4): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2001. On the government of disability. Social Theory and Practice 27 (4): 617–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2006. Reproductive freedom, self‐regulation, and the government of impairment in utero. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 21 (1): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremain, Shelley. 2010. Bio‐power, styles of reasoning, and what's still missing from the stem cell debates. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 25 (3): 577–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2012. Review of The faces of intellectual disability: Philosophical reflections by Licia Carlson and Racism and sexual oppression in Anglo‐America: A genealogy by Ladelle McWhorter. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 27 (2): 440–45.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Pieter. 2005. The taming of disability: Phrenology and bio‐power on the road to the destruction of otherness in France (1800–1860). History of Education 34 (2): 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar