Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:06:50.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alterity in Simone de Beauvoir and Emmanuel Levinas: From Ambiguity to Ambivalence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Valerie Giovanini
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is meant to stage an encounter, a kind of rendezvous, between Emmanuel Levinas and Simone de Beauvoir regarding how alterity seems to enable an ethical relation for Levinas while closing one for Beauvoir. I will argue that Beauvoir's reading of Levinas on “the other” is not a charitable one, and the ethical ambivalence in Levinas's notion of alterity can motivate the praxis Beauvoir seeks for undoing social forms of oppression. I will start with Beauvoir's interpretation of alterity as “feminine otherness” in Levinas's ethics that, for her, originates in the violent perspective of male privilege. Then I will move to Levinas's response to this critique in a set of interviews with Philip Nemo, and to consideration of how a more charitable reading of alterity, understood as a sort of ambivalence in the structure of subjectivity, creates a close proximity between Levinas's and Beauvoir's ethics of action. I contend that both Beauvoir and Levinas respectively developed their ethics of action, either of ambiguity or of ambivalent alterity, in order to free thought from the absolute seriousness with which normative standards are held.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Winter 2019 , pp. 39 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948/1976. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1952/1989. The second sex. Trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 2000. Abjection and ambiguity: Simone de Beauvoir's legacy. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 14 (2): 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 2001. Introduction. In Re‐reading the canon: Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas, ed. Chanter, Tina. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1909. Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol. X, ed. Strachey, James. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho‐analysis.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1993/2001. The fecundity of the caress: A reading of Levinas, Totality and Infinity, “Phenomenology of Eros.” In Re‐reading the canon: Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas, ed. Chanter, Tina. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Claire Elise. 2001. Reinhabiting the house of Ruth: Exceeding the limits of the feminine in Levinas. In Re‐reading the canon: Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas, ed. Chanter, Tina. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Monika. 2003. Beauvoir and Merleau‐Ponty on ambiguity. In The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, Claudia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1947/1987. Time and the other: And additional essays. Trans. Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1961/1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1974/2009. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987/1998. Collected philosophical papers. Trans. Alphonso Lingis. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, Joseph, and Campling, J. 1997. Existentialism, feminism, and Simone de Beauvoir. New York: Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Brian. 1996. Altared ground: Levinas, history, and violence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. 2001. The delightful other: Portraits of the feminine in Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and Levinas. In Re‐reading the canon: Feminist interpretations of Emmanuel Levinas, ed. Chanter, Tina. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Eric. 2008. Spitzer apologizes after prostitution case surfaces. National Public Radio, March 10. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=88080697.Google Scholar
Weisbrode, Kenneth. 2012. On ambivalence: The problems and pleasures of having it both ways. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, Emma, and Grant, Melissa Gira. 2017. After deadly vice sting, advocates say end to prostitution arrests is long overdue. Justice Today, November 30. https://injusticetoday.com/after-deadly-massage-parlor-raid-advocates-say-end-to-prostitution-arrests-is-long-overdue-e61f4aae1bca.Google Scholar