Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:14:26.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Violence, Trauma, and Resistance: A Feminist Appraisal of Metz's Mysticism of Suffering unto God

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Johann M. Vento
Johann M. Vento
Affiliation:
Georgian Court College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The trauma that results from violence against women presents a challenge to theological reflection on the meaning of suffering. The mysticism of suffering unto God in the theology of J.B. Metz offers an essential contribution to this reflection. There is a remarkable compatibility between women's experiences of trauma and healing and Metz's understanding of suffering unto God, especially in its refusal to glorify suffering. Further, Metz's understanding presents a much needed mystical-political dimension to theological reflection on violence against women, because of its capacity to nurture on going resistance to the victimization of all women, past and present. Metz's mystical stance, holding together both anguish and radical hope, challenges feminist theology, in its treatment of violence against women, to attend to the relationship between the mystical and political.

Type
Articles
Information
Horizons , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Spring 2002 , pp. 7 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Metz, Johann Baptist, “Political Theology: A New Paradigm of Theology?” in Civil Religion and Political Theology, ed. Rouner, Leroy S. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986), 149.Google Scholar

2 Metz, Johann Baptist, “Communicating a Dangerous Memory,” in Communicating a Dangerous Memory: Soundings in Political Theology, ed. Lawrence, Fred (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1987), 40.Google Scholar

3 Metz, Johann Baptist, “The Future in the Memory of Suffering,” trans. Griffiths, J., in New Questions on God, ed. Metz, J.B. (New York: Herder & Herder, 1972), 18.Google Scholar

4 Metz, Johann Baptist, Faith in History and Society, trans. Smith, David (New York: Seabury, 1981), 76.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., 143.

6 Metz argues against the theologies of Jürgen Moltmann and Hans Urs von Balthasar, among others, who speak of the suffering of God or of suffering within the Trinitarian God. Metz wishes to distance his own understanding from these. He argues that there is a danger in these perspectives of eternalizing suffering or of a “secret aes-theticization of all suffering.” Metz warns that these perspectives evidence a Hegelian sublation of the negativity of suffering that reduces suffering once again to its concept. See Metz, Johann Baptist, “Suffering unto God,” trans. Matthew Ashley, J., Critical Inquiry 20/4 (Summer 1994): 619.Google Scholar

7 Ibid. See also Metz, Johann Baptist, “Theology as Theodicy?” in A Passion For God: The Mystical-Political Dimension of Christianity, trans. Matthew Ashley, J. (New York: Paulist, 1998), 54–71.Google Scholar

8 See Ashley's translator's note in Metz, , “Suffering unto God,” 611.Google Scholar

9 Simon, Derek, “‘No One, Not Even God, Can Take The Place of the Victim’: Metz, Levinas, and Practical Christology after the Shoah,” Horizons 26/2 (1999): 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Metz, , “Suffering unto God,” 620–21.Google Scholar

11 LaCapra, Dominick, Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, and Trauma (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994)Google Scholar and History and Memory After Auschwitz (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), 23.

12 Jeffrey Means, J., Trauma and Evil: Healing the Wounded Soul (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2000).Google Scholar

13 National Clearinghouse for the Defense of Battered Women, Statistics Packet (Philadelphia, 1994).Google Scholar All of the following statistics are found in this resource.

14 Seifert, Ruth, “War and Rape: A Preliminary Analysis,” in Mass Rape: The War Against Women in Bosnia-Herzegovina, ed. Stiglmayer, Alexandra (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994), 56.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 55.

16 Waites, Elizabeth, Trauma and Survival: Post-Traumatic and Dissociative Disorders in Women (New York: Norton, 1993), 22.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., 36.

18 Ibid., 23–49.

19 Ibid., 22.

20 LaCapra, , History and Memory After Auschwitz, 23.Google Scholar

21 It must be noted that victims, during and in the immediate aftermath of the victimization will often minimize what is happening through dissociation and memory loss as part of a survival strategy. Victims should not be criticized for doing this, since it is a coping strategy that functions to protect the victim from the immediacy of the event. Facing the full impact of the suffering and working through the trauma can only take place some time after the traumatic event in a protected environment, once physical safety has been established.

22 Herman, Judith, Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (New York: Basic Books, 1992).Google Scholar

23 Pellauer, Mary, “Augustine on Rape: One Chapter in the Theological Tradition,” in Violence Against Women and Children: A Christian Theological Sourcebook (New York: Continuum, 1995), 207–41.Google Scholar

24 Elizondo, Felissa, “Violence Against Women: Strategies of Resistance and Sources of Healing in Christianity,” in Violence Against Women, ed. Fiorenza, Elisabeth Schüssler and Copeland, Mary Shawn (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1994), 99–108.Google Scholar

25 For a collection of the voices of women who have been victims of violence and their struggles to interpret their suffering according to Christian teaching, see Crysdale, Cynthia S.W., Embracing Travail: Retrieving the Cross Today (New York: Continuum, 1999), 96–97.Google Scholar For surveys about pastoral practices with regard to violence against women, see Schertz, Mary H., “Creating Justice in the Space Around Us: Toward a Biblical Theology of Peace Between Men and Women,” in Peace Theology and Violence Against Women, ed. Yoder, Elizabeth (Elkhart, IN: Institute for Mennonite Studies, 1992), 14Google Scholar; and Johnson, John M. and Bondurant, Denise M., “Revisiting the 1982 Church Response Survey,” in Violence Against Women and Children: A Christian Theological Sourcebook, 425–26.Google Scholar

26 See Farley, Wendy, Tragic Vision and Divine Compassion: A Contemporary Theodicy (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1990)Google Scholar; Brock, Rita Nakashima and Thistlethwaite, Susan Brooks, Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1996)Google Scholar; and Johnson, Elizabeth A., She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse (New York: Crossroad, 1992), 246–72.Google Scholar

27 Brown, Joanne Carlson and Parker, Rebecca, “For God So Loved The World?” in Christianity, Patriarchy, and Abuse, ed. Brown, Joanne Carlson and Bohn, Carole R. (New York: Pilgrim, 1990), 1–30.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 7.

29 See Cooper-White, Pamela, The Cry of Tamar: Violence Against Women and the Church's Response (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), 94Google Scholar; and Fortune, Marie M., “The Transformation of Suffering: A Biblical and Theological Perspective,” in Violence Against Women: A Christian Sourcebook, 85–91.Google Scholar

30 Fortune, Marie, “Violence Against Women: The Way Things Are is Not the Way They Have to Be,” in Sexuality and the Sacred: Sources for Theological Reflection, eds. Nelson, James B. and Longfellow, Sandra P.. (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox, 1994), 326–34.Google Scholar