Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:54:39.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III. After the War: The Responsibility and Competence of Academics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2020

Zorica Maros
Zorica Maros*
Affiliation:
Catholic Theological Faculty
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty-five years after the end of the war, the political and social scene of Bosnia and Herzegovina is still characterized by the mentality of the 1990s. In recent months, we have witnessed political rhetoric that is very much reminiscent of the time before, at the beginning, and during the war. In the first part of this essay, I will try to present some of the reasons for this situation. In the second part, I will point out the responsibility of intellectuals for such a condition. In this concluding section, I will discuss how we have used our academic resources in an attempt to change the situation and strengthen social responsibility.

Type
Theological Roundtable
Information
Horizons , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , June 2020 , pp. 90 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © College Theology Society, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

30 Cf. Samir Huseinović, “Egzodus iz Bosne i Hercegovine,” https://www.dw.com/hr/egzodus-iz-bosne-i-hercegovine/a-49490471.

31 For example, presidency member Milorad Dodik recently (October 18, 2019) stated that the breakup of BH was inevitable and that the only way out was to create three mini-states, namely the internal division advocated by nationalist parties in the run-up to the war in the 1990s, which was then the goal of ethical cleansing. Cf. HINA, “Dodik: BH se raspada, trebaju se uspostaviti tri nove države,” https://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/dodik-bih-se-raspada-trebaju-se-uspostaviti-tri-nove-drzave/2124960.aspx.

32 Ricoeur, Paul, Ricordare, dimenticare, perdonare. L'enigma del passato (Bologna: Il Muligno, 2004), 83Google Scholar.

33 Bauman, Zygmunt, Modernità e Olocausto (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1992), 5–10Google Scholar. Cited in Zorica Maros, “The Dayton Peace Agreement: A Material and Moral Degradation of Humanity,” in Pravda u BH društvu. Izazov temeljne ljudskosti, eds. Zorica Maros and Darko Tomašević (Sarajevo and Zagreb: Katolički bogoslovni fakultet—Glas Koncila, 2017), 29. This paragraph is taken from Maros, “The Dayton Peace Agreement,” 2–38.

34 Kapo, Midhat, Nacionalizam i obrazovanje. Studija slučaja Bosna i Hercegovina (Sarajevo: Fond otvoreno društvo Bosna i Hercegovina, 2012), 2Google Scholar. This and the following two paragraphs are taken from the article by Maros, Zorica, “Relationships between memory, justice and forgiveness with a focus on Bosnia and Herzegovina,” Jahrbuch für Christliche Sozialwissenschaften 59 (2018): 127–54Google Scholar.

35 Cf. Tribić, Đenana, ed., Obrazovanje u Bosni i Hercegovini. Čemu učimo djecu? Analiza sadržaja udžbenika nacionalne grupe predmeta (Sarajevo: Fond otvoreno društvo Bosna i Hercegovina, 2007), 146–82Google Scholar.

36 Cf. Diegoli, Tommaso, Kolektivno pamćenje i obnova društva u poslijeratnoj Bosni i Hercegovini (Sarajevo: Fond otvoreno društvo Bosna i Hercegovina, 2007), 52–55, 85Google Scholar.

37 Cf. Jaspers, Karl, Pitanje krivice (Belgrade: Fondacija Konrad Adenauer, 2009), 26Google Scholar. This paragraph is taken from Maros, “Relationships between Memory, Justice and Forgiveness with a Focus on Bosnia and Herzegovina,” 148.

38 Cf. Jaspers, Pitanje krivice, 26–29. This paragraph is taken from Maros, “The Dayton Peace Agreement: A Material and Moral Degradation of Humanity,” 34.

39 Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, November 24, 2013, no. 220, http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html.

40 Cf. Šarčević, Ivan, “Intelektualac između fanatizma i cinizma,” in Zlo nasilja u etničkim sukobima. Poraz moralno-povijesnog imperativa: nikad više, eds. Zorica Maros and Darko Tomašević (Sarajevo and Zagreb: Katolički bogoslovni fakultet—Glas Koncila, 2016), 173Google Scholar.

41 Cf. Šarčević, “Intelektualac između fanatizma i cinizma,” 168–70. See also Prcela, Frano, Bogozaborav. Razmišljanja o aktualnim izazovima crkve (Sarajevo and Zagreb: Synopsis, 2014), 15–16Google Scholar.

42 Cf. Prcela, Bogozaborav, 24–25.

43 Cfr. Šarčević, “Intelektualac između fanatizma i cinizma,” 183–88.

44 Prcela, Bogozaborav, 25.

45 Prcela, Bogozaborav, 17.

46 More about the summer school can be seen at https://kbf.unsa.ba/ljetna-skola-summer-school.

47 Mardešić, Željko, Svjedočanstva o mirotvorstvu (Zagreb: Kršćanska sadašnjost, 2002), 37Google Scholar.

48 Mardešić, Svjedočanstva o mirotvorstvu, 27.