No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2014
This essay explores the theology of the Religion of the Republic (what Robert N. Bellah called civil religion in America) in order to compare it with elements in the catholic tradition of Christianity. The assumption is that the Religion of the Republic has much in common with the consensual religiosity of American evangelicalism.
Using John Williamson Nevin's “Catholicism” of the Mercersburg theology, the author provides a critique of the theology of the Republic and suggests a principle of radical catholicity which offers a profound role for the church in the destiny of the American Republic.
1 See Hofstadter, Richard, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (New York: Knopf, 1963).Google Scholar
2 Mead, Sidney E., The Lively Experiment (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), 55.Google Scholar
3 Latourette, Kenneth Scott, A History of the Expansion of Christianity (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1937–1945), 4:415.Google Scholar
4 Mead, Sidney E., The Nation with the Soul of a Church (New York: Harper & Row, 1975), 28, 69, 76.Google Scholar
5 See Nichols, James Hasting, Romanticism in American Theology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961);Google Scholar also Binkley, Luther J., The Mercersburg Theology (Lancaster: Franklin and Marshall College, 1953);Google Scholar and Wentz, Richard E., “John Williamson Nevin and American Nationalism,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 58/4 (Winter 1990): 617–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Bellah, Robert N., “Civil Religion in America,” Daedalus 96/1 (Winter 1967): 1.Google Scholar
7 Wilson, John F., Public Religion in American Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
8 Brian Wilson, in a lecture delivered at Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture, Nagoya, Japan, 1985 (notes taken by the author).
9 Beecher, Lyman, Sermons Delivered on Various Occasions (Boston: T. R. Mervin, 1828), 301–05.Google Scholar
10 May, Henry F., “Intellectual History and Religious History” in his Ideas, Faiths, and Feelings (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 149.Google Scholar
11 Mead, , Nation, 118;Google Scholar see also May, , “The Religion of the Republic,” in Ideas, Faiths, and Feelings, 115–71.Google Scholar
12 May, “The Decline of Providence?” in ibid., 136-37.
13 Farrer, Austin, A Faith of Our Own (Cleveland: World, 1960), 75–76.Google Scholar
14 See Boorstin, Daniel J., The Genius of American Politics (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953, 1967).Google Scholar
15 Cousins, Norman, ed., In God We Trust: The Religious Beliefs and Ideas of the American Founding Fathers (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958), 42.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., 66.
17 Quoted in Wolf, William J., The Religion of Abraham Lincoln (New York: Seabury, 1963), 158–59.Google Scholar
18 Mead, , Lively Experiment, 80.Google Scholar
19 Cousins, , In God We Trust, 19.Google Scholar
20 Ibid., 63.
21 Ibid., 42 (from letter to Ezra Stiles).
22 Ibid., 35 (from Franklin's autobiography).
23 “Notes on the State of Virginia” in Peterson, Merrill D., ed., Thomas Jefferson: Writings (New York: Viking, 1989), 286–87.Google Scholar
24 Ibid., 287.
25 Gaustad, Edwin S., A Documentary History of Religion in America (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1982), 1:263.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., 63.
27 Nash, Roderick, Wilderness and the American Mind (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967, 1982), 97.Google Scholar
28 Cousins, , In God We Trust, 123.Google Scholar
29 Bellah, Robert N. and Hammond, Phillip E., Varieties of Civil Religion (New York: Harper & Row, 1980), 170.Google Scholar Ralph Ketcham has recently demonstrated that Americans have tended to see their freedom and fulfillment in proportion to a lack of public burden or intrusion. There has been no great reverence for culture and nation, except as they enhance individual claims. The liberal tradition tends to validate a wild confusion of interests, passions, and impulses in which politics is a fractured process (Ketcham, Ralph, Individualism and Public Life [New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987]Google Scholar).
30 Newman, John Henry, An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960 [1845]);Google ScholarSchaff, Philip, The Principle of Protestantism (Chambersburg, PA: Reformed Church Publishing, 1845);Google Scholar and Nevin, John Williamson, The Mystical Presence (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1846).Google Scholar
31 Gaustad, Edwin S., Faith of Our Fathers (New York: Harper & Row, 1987), 109.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., 57 (my emphasis).
33 Bellah, and Hammond, , Varieties of Civil Religion, 170–71.Google Scholar
34 Bellah, Robert W., Broken Covenant (New York: Seabury, 1975), 23–24.Google Scholar
35 Nevin, John Williamson, “The Sect System” (first article), Mercersburg Review 1/5 (September 1849): 499.Google Scholar
36 Ibid., 497.
37 Ibid., 494.
38 Ibid., 496.
39 Nevin, John Williamson, “The Sect System” (second article), Mercersburg Review 1/7 (November 1849): 526.Google Scholar
40 Nevin, John Williamson, The Anxious Bench in Yrigoyen, Charles Jr., and Bricker, George H., eds., Catholic and Reformed Selected Theological Writings of John Williamson Nevin (Pittsburgh: Pickwick, 1978), 106.Google Scholar
41 Berdyaev, Nicolas, The Destiny of Man (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1939, 1948), 114, 164.Google Scholar
42 Mead, , Lively Experiment, 135.Google Scholar
43 Santayana, George, Reason in Religion in Alston, William P., Religious Belief and Philosophical Thought (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1963), 567.Google Scholar
44 Nevin, , “Sect System,” (first article) 500–01.Google Scholar
45 See Marty, Martin E., “Scripturality: The Bible as Icon in the Republic” in his Religion & Republic (Boston: Beacon, 1987), 140–65.Google Scholar
46 Nevin, John Williamson, “Catholicism,” Mercersburg Review 3/1 (January 1851): 4.Google Scholar
47 Ibid., 5.
48 Ibid., 12.
49 Nevin, , “Catholicism,” 19.Google Scholar
50 Ibid., 18.
51 Ibid., 14.
52 Nevin, John Williamson, “The Year 1848,” Mercersburg Review 1/1 (January 1849): 10–44.Google Scholar