Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:22:19.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Being a Christian in the Business World: The Challenge and the Promise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2014

Oliver F. Williams
Oliver F. Williams*
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What does it mean to be a Christian in today's business world? It is this question which provides the focus for a course I teach called “Modern Decision Making in the Christian Tradition.” The course is designed for college juniors and seniors who are interested in exploring the implications of Christian faith for a professional life. Students are exposed to the flaws in Adam Smith's famous apology for the capitalist economy and offered an approach to working in the system and reforming it from a Christian standpoint.

It has been my experience that most students in the course are serious about their Christian faith, that is, they go to church on Sunday and they strive to live the sort of life that they understand to be Christian. They are largely from good homes and have learned the value of friendship and love from dedicated parents. Most of them, however, have not been challenged to think through the implications of their Christian faith for their life in the business world or in the wider social order.

While they may be models of compassion and generosity to those in their immediate circles, many students today have a blindspot for responsibilities in the socio-political order. In the traditional vocabulary, they are strong on charity but weak in justice. Justice in our time is often equated with “law and order,” the quid pro quo's that insure that we each get what we deserve. One of the objectives of the course is to widen the horizons of the students so that they come to see more adequately what is entailed in calling oneself “Christian.” To begin, I have them reflect on sections of “Justice in the World,” the document issued by the Roman Synod of Bishops in 1971.

Type
Creative Teaching
Information
Horizons , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1984 , pp. 383 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “Justice in the World” in Gremillion, Joseph, ed., The Gospel of Peace and Justice: Catholic Social Teaching Since Pope John (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1976), p. 514.Google Scholar

2 Sinclair, Upton, The Jungle (New York: New American Library, 1960 [1906]).Google Scholar

3 Birch, Bruce and Rasmussen, Larry, The Predicament of the Prosperous (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1978).Google Scholar

4 In Williams, Oliver and Houck, John, The Judeo-Christian Vision and the Modern Corporation (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982), pp. 107–202.Google Scholar

5 In ibid., pp. 203-17.

6 Laborem Exercens (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1981).Google Scholar

7 Houck, John W. and Williams, Oliver F. C.S.C., , eds., Co-Creation and Capitalism: John Paul II's Laborem Exercens (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1983).Google Scholar

8 Williams, Oliver and Houck, John, Full Value (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1978).Google Scholar

9 Berger, Peter, Pyramids of Sacrifice (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1976).Google Scholar

10 Bolt, Robert, A Man For All Seasons (New York: Random House, 1962), p. xii.Google Scholar

11 Some interpreters of Adam Smith, citing his earlier work in ethics, argue that Smith assumed that the good citizens would promote the common good. See Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1976 [originally published in 1753, 20 years earlier than The Wealth of Nations]).Google Scholar Contemporary interpreters of Smith, such as Milton Friedman, would strongly disagree with this emphasis on consciously adverting to the common good.