Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:26:10.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychologists and the War: The Meaning of Intelligence in the Alpha and Beta Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Joel H. Spring
Joel H. Spring*
Affiliation:
Education, Case Western Reserve University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Great will be our good fortune,” Robert Yerkes, head of the U. S. Army psychology team, wrote, “if the lesson in human engineering which the war has taught is carried over directly and effectively into our civil institutions and activities.” For psychology and the schools the great experiment of World War I was the construction and standardization of the Alpha and Beta group intelligence test as a technique for differentiating men within disciplined and highly stratified social organizations. The dream shared by psychologists, social reformers, and educators of the time was the creation of an efficiently organized society by the proper allocation of manpower resources. The individual I.Q. test was impractical to use with large numbers of the American population to determine proper occupational niches. Mass testing with a group I.Q. test, it was believed, made human engineering feasible. Efficiency in the human group, claimed army test developer, H. H. Goddard, in a 1920 lecture, “is not so much a question of the absolute numbers of persons of high and low intelligence as it is whether each grade of intelligence is assigned a part, in the whole organization, that is within its capacity.” Goddard went on to suggest that man could learn from the busy bee “the perfect organization of the hive.” “Perhaps,” Goddard stated, “it would be wiser for us to emulate the bee's social organization more and his supposed industry less.”

Type
Progressivism Revisited
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1972 , pp. 3 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 by New York University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Yoadkum, Clarence S. and Yerkes, Robert M., eds. and comps., Army Mental Tests (New York, 1920), p. viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Goddard, Henry Herbert, Human Efficiency and Levels of Intelligence (Princeton, 1920), pp. 35, 62.Google Scholar

3. Whipple, Guy M., “Intelligence Tests in Colleges and Universities,“ National Society for the Study of Education Year Book 21 (1922): 254.Google Scholar

4. Yerkes, Robert M., ed., “Psychological Examining in the United States Army,” National Academy of Sciences Memoirs (Washington, D.C., 1921): 15, 7–8.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., p. 299.Google Scholar

6. Goddard, , Human Efficiency, p. 7.Google Scholar

7. Army Mental Tests, p. vii.Google Scholar

8. Binet, Alfred and Simon, Th., The Development of Intelligence in Children (Baltimore, 1916), p. 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Ibid., p. 262.Google Scholar

10. Ibid., pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., pp. 266–67.Google Scholar

12. Goddard, Henry Herbert, Feeble-Mindedness: Its Causes and Consequences (New York, 1914), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 5.Google Scholar

14. Thorndike, Edward L., Human Nature and the Social Order (New York, 1940), pp. 430–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Army Mental Tests, p. 32.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., pp. 53–54.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., p. 36.Google Scholar

19. Binet, , Development of Intelligence, p. 254.Google Scholar

20. Whipple, , Intelligence Tests, p. 260.Google Scholar

21. “Intelligence and Its Measurement: A Symposium,” The Journal of Educational Psychology 12, no. 3 (March 1921): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22. Terman, L. M., “Intelligence and Its Measurement,“ The Journal of Educational Psychology 12, no. 3 (March 1921), pp. 127–28.Google Scholar

23. Terman, L. M., “Mental Growth and the I.Q.,“ The Journal of Educational Psychology 12 (1921): p. 403.Google Scholar

24. Terman, , “Intelligence and Its Measurement,“ p. 128.Google Scholar

25. Ibid., p. 128.Google Scholar

26. Goddard, , Human Efficiency, p. 60.Google Scholar