Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:41:38.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty and Parenting: Transforming Early Education's Legacy in the 1960s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Elizabeth Rose
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Head Start, the federal program that provides preschool education, health, and social services for children from poor families, is one of the United States' most popular government programs. Created in 1965, it has endured as a symbol of commitment to children, serving just fewer than one million children a year in neighborhood sites across the country. Most accounts of Head Start's history do not start much before 1964 when Sargent Shriver, charged with directing Lyndon Johnson's antipoverty campaign, decided to focus funds on young children. Neither Shriver nor most of those he consulted in planning the new program were particularly conscious of earlier efforts to combat poverty by educating young children. Nevertheless, the program they designed carried forward important aspects of turn-of-the-twentieth-century free kindergartens and day nurseries, as well as the nursery schools sponsored by the federal government in the 1930s.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 222 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 William, W. Cutler, III, Parents and Schools: The 150-Year Struggle for Control in American Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar

2 Quoted in Vandewalker, Nina C., The Kindergarten in American Education (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1908), 62–63.Google Scholar

3 Beatty, Barbara, Preschool Education in America: The Culture of Young Children from the Colonial Era to the Present (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995), 88–89.Google Scholar

4 Cuban, Larry, “Why Some Reforms Last: The Case of the Kindergarten.” American Journal of Education 100, no. 2 (February 1992): 166–194; Beatty, , Preschool Education in America: The Culture of Young Children from the Colonial Era to the Present, 124–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 As quoted in Rose, Elizabeth, A Mother's Job: The History of Day Care, 1890–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 35, 40, 91–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Rose, , A Mother's Job: The History of Day Care, 1890–1960, 106.Google Scholar

7 Beatty, , Preschool Education in America: The Culture of Young Children from the Colonial Era to the Present, 153.Google Scholar

8 As quoted in Rose, A Mothers Job: The History of Day Care, 1890–1960, 115.Google Scholar

9 See Rose, , A Mother's Job: The History of Day Care, 1890–1960, 144–152; Beatty, , Preschool Education in America: The Culture of Young Children from the Colonial Era to the Present, 177–185; and Michel, Sonya, Children's Interests/Mothers’ Rights: The Shaping of America's Child Care Policy (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999), 118–127.Google Scholar

10 Michel, , Children's Interests/Mothers’ Rights: The Shaping of America's Child Care Policy, 120.Google Scholar

11 Minutes of Wharton Centre Nursery Mothers’ Club, 1937–1941, Box 27, Folder 184, Wharton Centre Collection, Urban Archives, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

12 Greenberg, Polly, “The Origins of Head Start and the Two Versions of Parent Involvement,” in Critical Perspectives on Project Head Start, ed. Jeanne Ellsworth and Lynda Ames (Albany: State University of New York, 1998), 64.Google Scholar

13 Zigler, Edward, interview by author, New Haven, CT, October 23, 2000.Google Scholar

14 Osborn, Keith, “Head Start, a Retrospective View: The Founders,” in Project Head Start: A Legacy of the War on Poverty, ed. Zigler, Edward and Valentine, Jeanette (New York: The Free Press, 1979), 109.Google Scholar

15 Antipoverty programs sponsored by the Office of Economic Opportunity were required by the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 to be run with the “maximum feasible participation of the poor.” See Rubin, Lillian, “Maximum Feasible Participation: Origins, Implications, and Current Status.” Annals of the American Academy of Political Science 385, no. 1 (September 1969): 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Greenberg, , “Origins of Head Start and the Two Versions of Parent Involvement,” 50.Google Scholar

17 “Mothers Learn To Cook,” Vol. 1, no. 7 (November 1966), 6; Head Start Newsletter, 1966–70; descriptions of other parent education classes from 1966 to 1970 can be found in other issues of the newsletter published by the Office of Economic Opportunity; Kagan, Josh, “Empowerment and Education: Civil Rights, Expert Advocates, and Parent Politics in Head Start, 1965–1980.” Teachers College Record 104, no. 3 (2002): 538.Google Scholar

18 [No author indicated], “Head Start Policy Change,” Head Start Newsletter 5, no. 5 (July 1970), 5.Google Scholar

19 Omwake, Eveline, “Assessment of the Head Start Preschool Education Effort,” in Project Head Start: A Legacy of the War on Poverty, ed. Zigler, Edward and Valentine, Jeanette (New York: The Free Press, 1979), 223.Google Scholar

20 Kagan, , “Empowerment and Education: Civil Rights, Expert Advocates, and Parent Politics in Head Start, 1965–1980,” 531; Greenberg, Polly, The Devil Has Slippery Shoes: A Biased Biography of the Child Development Group of Mississippi (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1969), 63.Google Scholar

21 Gonzales, Jack, “Too Many Cooks? “ Head Start Newsletter 2, no. 1 January 1967): 1, 3.Google Scholar

22 Project Head Start, Head Start: Manual of Policies and Instructions (Washington, DC, Office of Child Development, 1967), 11.Google Scholar

23 Stirling, Nora, “Stop, Look, & Listen: Children Ahead” (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Child Development [OCD 72–61], 1972).Google Scholar

24 Kirschner Associates, A National Survey of the Impacts of Head Start Centers on Community Institutions (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1970), 7, 9.Google Scholar

25 Valentine, Jeanette and Stark, Evan, “The Social Context of Parent Involvement in Head Start,” in Project Head Start: A Legacy of the War on Poverty, ed. Zigler, Edward and Valentine, Jeanette (New York: The Free Press, 1979), 298.Google Scholar

26 [No Author Listed], “Parents Get to Work,” Head Start Newsletter 2, no. 7 (July 1967).Google Scholar

27 Kagan, , “Empowerment and Education: Civil Rights, Expert Advocates, and Parent Politics in Head Start, 1965–1980,” 537; Virginia Estes, “Head Start and the Parent.” Head Start Newsletter 6, no. 4 (February/March 1972): 5–7.Google Scholar

28 Zigler, Edward F. and Muenchow, Susan, Head Stan: The Inside Story of America's Most Successful Educational Experiment (New York: Basic Books, 1992), 186; see also Vinovskis, Maris A., “The Carter Administration's Attempt to Transfer Head Start into the U.S. Department of Éducation in the Late 1970s,” (unpublished working paper in author's possession, 2002).Google Scholar

29 Jacobson, Linda, “Head Start Imbroglio a Struggle for Hearts, Minds, Votes,” Education Week (18 June 2003), 8.Google Scholar