Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:31:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Education of Engineers in America before the Morrill Act of 1862

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Terry S. Reynolds*
Affiliation:
The Department of Social Sciences at Michigan Technological University

Extract

The traditional view of antebellum colleges, as exemplified by the works of Richard Hofstadter and others, depicts them as dogmatic, elitist, inflexible, and hostile both to science and to more practically oriented subjects, such as engineering. Only in recent decades have scholars disputed this view. Stanley Guralnick in 1975 challenged the contention that antebellum colleges were antagonistic to science, demonstrating that they made extraordinary and successful efforts to modify their curricula and add faculty to increase science offerings. Shortly after, in 1982, Colin Burke published a broadly based, quantitative study of antebellum colleges which revealed that they were far more successful, accessible, adaptable, and progressive than previously recognized.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For examples of the traditional view, see Hofstadter, Richard, Academic Freedom in the Age of the College (New York, 1955), 209ff.; Hofstadter, and De Witt Hardy, C., The Development and Scope of Higher Education in the United States (New York, 1952), 19–27; and Tewksbury, Donald G., The Founding of American Colleges and Universities before the Civil War, with Particular Reference to the Religious Influences Bearing upon the College Movement (Hamden, Conn., 1965), esp. 3–33. Guralnick, Stanley M., Science and the Ante-Bellum American College (Philadelphia, 1975); Burke, Colin B., American Collegiate Populations: A Test of the Traditional View (New York, 1982).Google Scholar

2 This system is briefly described in “The Engineering Schools of the United States, III,” Engineering News 27 (2 Apr. 1892): 318. A modification of this system used on early American public works projects is described in Calhoun, Daniel H., The American Civil Engineer: Origins and Conflict (Cambridge, Mass., 1960), 2430.Google Scholar

3 This boom is described in Taylor, George Rogers, The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860 (New York, 1951). See also Goodrich, Carter, Government Promotion of American Canals and Railroads, 1800–1890 (New York, 1960).Google Scholar

4 Caullery, Maurice, Universities and Scientific Life in the United States, trans. Woods, James Haughton and Russell, Emmet (Cambridge, Mass., 1922), 116; Eddy, Edward Danforth, Colleges for Our Land and Time: The Land-Grant Idea in American Education (New York, 1957), 10–11; Ross, Earle D., Democracy's Colleges: The Land-Grant Movement in the Formative Stage (Ames, Ia., 1942), 14–20. Other examples are Cheit, Earl F., The Useful Arts and the Liberal Tradition (New York, 1975), 18, 19, 61; Good, H. G., A History of American Education (New York, 1956), 288–89; and Rogers, Walter P., Andrew D. White and the Modern University (Ithaca, N.Y., 1941), 44.Google Scholar

5 Mann, Charles Riborg, A Study of Engineering Education …, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Bulletin no. 11 (New York, 1918), 6; Society for the Promotion of Engineering Education, Report of the Investigation of Engineering Education, 1923–1929 (Pittsburgh, 1930), 1: 816; Noble, David F., America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (New York, 1976), 24; Mavis, Frederick T., “History of Engineering Education,” Centennial of Engineering: History and Proceedings of Symposia, 1852–1952 , ed. Lohr, Lenox R. (Chicago, 1953), 192; McGivern, James, First Hundred Years of Engineering Education in the United States (Spokane, Wash., 1960), 88; Grayson, Lawrence P., “A Brief History of Engineering Education in the United States,” Engineering Education 67 (Dec. 1977): 247–50.Google Scholar

6 See, for example, Wayland, Francis, Thoughts on the Present Collegiate System in the United States (Boston, 1842).Google Scholar

7 See Molloy, Peter M., “Technical Education and the Young Republic: West Point as America's Ecole Polytechnique, 1802–1833” (Ph.D. diss, Brown University, 1975); and Artz, Frederick B., The Development of Technical Education in France, 1500–1850 (Cambridge. Mass., 1966).Google Scholar

8 The best account of the origins and early history of West Point is Molloy, “Technical Education and the Young Republic.” See also, however, Morrison, James L. Jr., “The Best School in the World”: West Point, the Pre–Civil War Years, 1833–1866 (Kent, Ohio, 1986); Calhoun, , American Civil Engineer, 37–43; and “U.S. Military Academy,” American Railroad journal 4 (11 July 1835): 427–28.Google Scholar

9 Ellis, William Arba, comp. and ed., Norwich University, 1819–1911, Her History, Her Graduates, Her Roll of Honor (Montpelier, Vt., 1911), esp. 1: 1150; Bush, George Gary, History of Education in Vermont (Washington, D.C., 1900), 186–98, Google Scholar

10 For VMI, see Couper, William, One Hundred Years at V.M.I. (Richmond, Va., 1939), 1: 3135, 42, 46, 149, and elsewhere; and Wise, Henry A., Drawing Out the Man: The VMI Story (Charlottesville, Va., 1978), 3, 9–30. For the Citadel, see Bond, O. J., The Story of the Citadel (Richmond, Va., 1936), 19, 22, 25; and Meriwether, Colyer, History of Higher Education in South Carolina, with a Sketch of the Free School System (Washington, D.C., 1889), 69–71. For the Naval Academy, see Barnard, Henry, Military Schools and Courses of Instruction in the Science and Art of War (New York, 1872), 897–98, 900; and Calvert, Monte A., The Mechanical Engineer in America, 1830–1910: Professional Cultures in Conflict (Baltimore, 1967), 20.Google Scholar

11 Sack, Saul, History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania (Harrisburg, Pa., 1963), 2: 501: Ellis, , Norwich University, 1: 395–401.Google Scholar

12 The mechanics' institute and lyceum movements are discussed in Bennett, Charles A., History of Manual and Industrial Education, Vol. 1: Up to 1870 (Peoria, Ill., 1926), 301–44; Bode, Carl, The American Lyceum: Town Meeting of the Mind (New York, 1956); and Sinclair, Bruce, Philadelphia's Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute, 1824–1865 (Baltimore, 1974), 1–19.Google Scholar

13 Cooper, John H., “An Account of the Gardiner Lyceum, the First Trade School Established in the United States,” Journal of the Franklin Institute 140 (1895): 275–87; Emmerson, George, Engineering Education: A Social History (Newton Abbot, Eng., 1973), 143–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Rezneck, Samuel, Education for a Technological Society: A Sesquicentennial History of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, N.Y., 1968); Baker, Ray Palmer, A Chapter in American Education: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1824–1924 (New York, 1924); “School of Civil Engineers,” American Railroad Journal 4 (30 May 1835): 321.Google Scholar

15 For Polytechnic College of Pennsylvania, see McGivern, , First Hundred Years, 8287; Sack, , History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, 2: 478–82; and Edward Warren, S., Notes on Polytechnic or Scientific Schools in the United States: Their Nature, Position, Aims, and Wants (New York, 1866), 6. For Brooklyn Polytechnic, see Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 7–8; and Bugliarello, George, Towards the Technological University: The Story of Polytechnic Institute of New York (New York, 1975), 12. For Nugent's school, see Nugent, Walter, “Engineers and Mechanics College,” American Railroad Journal 27 (1854): 217. For Greene's school, see Rezneck, , Education for a Technological Society, 128–29.Google Scholar

16 For the University of Vermont, see Lindsay, Julian Ira, Tradition Looks Forward: The University of Vermont—A History, 1791–1904 (Burlington, 1954), 274. For Columbia, see Smith, Herbert E., “Historical Development of Technical Education in the First Nine Colleges Founded in the United States, 1636–1862” (Ph.D. diss., New York University, 1940), 227. For Princeton, see Maclean, John, History of the College of New Jersey, 1746–1854 (New York, 1969), 2: 300; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 215–16, 270. For Hackney's course, see “A Course of Instruction in Civil Engineering,” American Railroad Journal 6 (29 Apr. 1837): 257.Google Scholar

17 For Pennsylvania, see Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 221–25; Cheyney, Edwards Potts, History of the University of Pennsylvania, 1740–1940 (Philadelphia, 1940), 239–42; and Thorpe, Francis N., ed., Benjamin Franklin and the University of Pennsylvania (Washington, D.C., 1893), 290–96. For Rutgers, see Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 254–56. For Brown, see Bronson, Walter C., The History of Brown University, 1764–1914 (Providence, R.I., 1914), 286–87, 323; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 247–51. For the University of Rochester, see Rosenberger, Jesse Leonard, Rochester: The Making of a University (Rochester, N.Y., 1927), 130–31. Some of these schools simultaneously introduced engineering as an option in a traditional B.A. program, discussed later.Google Scholar

18 For Georgetown College and Cincinnati College, see Good, H. G., “New Data on Early Engineering Education,” Journal of Educational Research 29 (Sep. 1935): 4144, citing Commonwealth (Frankfort, Ky.), 2 May and 26 Sep. 1835 and 20 Apr. 1836, citing Cincinnati Daily Gazette, 9 Feb. 1836, and citing Cincinnati Daily Gazette, 19 and 21 Oct. 1836; see also McGrane, Reginald C., The University of Cincinnati: A Success Story in Urban Higher Education (New York, 1963), 29, 31. For Washington College, see Sack, , History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, 2: 458–59; and Coleman, Helen T. W., Banners in the Wilderness: Early Years of Washington and Jefferson College (Pittsburgh, 1956), 128.Google Scholar

19 Allan Gianniny, O. Jr., “The Overlooked Southern Approach to Engineering Education: One and a Half Centuries at the University of Virginia, 1836–1866,” in Proceedings of the 150th Anniversary Symposium on Technology and Society: Southern Technology: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Hartman, Howard L. (Tuscaloosa, Ala., 1988), 153–54.Google Scholar

20 Calhoun, , American Civil Engineer, 2430, describes the system developed on the Erie Canal and widely used elsewhere.Google Scholar

21 For the University of Virginia, see Bruce, Philip A., History of the University of Virginia, 1819–1919: The Lengthened Shadow of One Man (New York, 1920), 2: 126, and (New York, 1921), 3: 48–49; and Gianniny, , “Overlooked Southern Approach,” 151–54. The University of Virginia in this period granted only the master of arts degree for completion of work in a number of the university's different “schools.” For William and Mary, see Holmes, George F., “Professor John Millington, M.D.,” William and Mary College Quarterly Historical Magazine ser. 2, v. 3 (1923): 23–35; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 193–95.Google Scholar

22 Norrell, Robert J., A Promising Field: Engineering at Alabama, 1837–1987 (Tuscaloosa, Ala., 1990), 419, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 For the University of Georgia, see Dyer, Thomas G., The University of Georgia: A Bicentennial History, 1785–1985 (Athens, Ga., 1985), 76, 77, 84, 86, 96, 105. For the University of Maryland, see Callcott, George H., A History of the University of Maryland (Baltimore, 1966), 96–97. For East Tennessee College, see Folmsbee, Stanley J., “Blount College and East Tennessee College, 1794–1840: The First Predecessors of the University of Tennessee,” East Tennessee Historical Society Publications 17 (1945): 50, n. 69. For the University of Mississippi, see Cabaniss, Allen, The University of Mississippi: Its First Hundred Years, 2d ed. (Hattiesburg, Miss., 1971), 16–17; and Chute, William J., Damn Yankee!: The First Career of Frederick A. P. Barnard (Port Washington, N.Y., 1978), 142, 146. For the University of Missouri, see Viles, Jonas, The University of Missouri: A Centennial History (Columbia, Mo., 1939), 35, 66, 80. For North Carolina, see Smith, Charles L., The History of Education in North Carolina (Washington, D.C., 1888), 80–81; and Powell, William S., The First State University: A Pictorial History of the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1972), 64.Google Scholar

24 Hunter, Robert F. and Dooley, Edwin L. Jr., Claudius Crozet: French Engineer in America, 1790–1864 (Charlottesville, Va., 1989), 154–55.Google Scholar

25 For Columbia, see Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 230–39; and Finch, James Kip, A History of the School of Engineering: Columbia University (New York, 1954), 21–22. For New York University, see Chamberlain, Joshua L., ed., New York University: Its History, Influence, Equipment and Characteristics with Biographical Sketches and Portraits of Founders, Benefactors, Officers and Alumni (Boston, 1901), 1: 64, 69, 71, 73, and 2: 26–27; and Jones, Theodore Francis, ed., New York University, 1832–1932 (New York, 1933), 305–7.Google Scholar

26 For Rutgers, see Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 254–56. For Rochester, see Rosenberger, , Rochester, 130–31.Google Scholar

27 For Woodward College, see Good, , “New Data on Engineering Education,” 4445, citing Cincinnati Daily Gazette, 1 Nov. 1836 and 15 Aug. 1837. For Miami University, see Good, , “New Data on Engineering Education,” 45, citing Cincinnati Daily Gazette, 1 Sep. 1837; and Havighurst, Walter, The Miami Years, 1809–1959 (New York, 1958), 54. For Western University, see Starrett, Agnes L., Through One Hundred and Fifty Years: The University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, Pa., 1937), 95, 124–25, 308–9. For Indiana University, see Clark, Thomas D., Indiana University, Midwestern Pioneer (Bloomington, Ind., 1970). 1: 73, 82, 84, 88.Google Scholar

28 Smith, , “The Historical Development of Technical Education,” 226–31; Fitch, , History of the School of Engineering, 20; and “Instruction in Civil Engineering—Literary and Scientific Course of Columbia College,” American Railroad Journal 7 (1 Oct. 1838): 206.Google Scholar

29 Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 247–52; and Bronson, , History of Brown University, 286–88.Google Scholar

30 For Wesleyan, see Price, Carl F., Wesleyan's First Century, with an Account of the Centennial Celebration (Middletown, Conn., 1932), 64. For Allegheny College, see Sack, , History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, 2: 457–58. For Denison College, see Wallace Chessman, G., Denison: The Story of an Ohio College (Granville, Ohio, 1957), 116–17. For the University of Missouri, see Viles, , The University of Missouri, 66, 80, 91, 97; and Snow, Marshall S., Higher Education in Missouri (Washington, D.C., 1901), 21–22. For Washington University, see Snow, , Higher Education in Missouri, 132; Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 7; and Shepley, Ethan A. H., What Does Washington University Stand For? A Historical Interpretation of the Goals and Achievements of Washington University, 1853–1958 (New York, 1958), 26. For Delaware College, see Powell, Lyman P., The History of Education in Delaware (Washington, D.C., 1893), 113–16; and Munroe, John A., The University of Delaware: A History (Newark, Del., 1986), 106, 140. For Maryland Agricultural College, see Callcott, , History of the University of Maryland, 145–46, 148–49. For Michigan Agricultural College, see Beal, W. J., History of the Michigan Agricultural College and Biographical Sketches of Trustees and Professors (East Lansing, Mich., 1915), 52–54; and Kuhn, Madison, Michigan State: The First Hundred Years, 1855–1955 (East Lansing, Mich., 1955), 55–58.Google Scholar

31 Raymond, Andrew V. V., Union University: Its History, Influence, Characteristics, and Equipment (New York, 1907), 1: 216–20; “Civil Engineering,” American Railroad Journal 25 (1852): 392; Rezneck, , Education for a Technological Society, 71–72; and Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 6.Google Scholar

32 Jones, , New York University, 309–12, 315; Sherwood, Sidney, The University of the State of New York: History of Higher Education in the State of New York (Washington, D.C., 1900), 266.Google Scholar

33 Donnelly, Walter A., ed., The University of Michigan: An Encyclopedic Survey (Ann Arbor. Mich., 1953), 3: 1161–65; and Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 6.Google Scholar

34 Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 181–91; Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 6; and “Lawrence Scientific School,” American Railroad journal 20 (1847): 678–79.Google Scholar

35 Chittenden, Russell H., History of the Sheffield Scientific School of Yale University, 1846–1922 (New Haven, Conn., 1928), 4177, 329–32; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 204–14.Google Scholar

36 Bush, George G., History of Education in New Hampshire (Washington, D.C., 1898), 163–64.Google Scholar

37 On Hobart, see Brown, Alan W., Hobart College: Oldest Episcopal College in U.S.A. (New York, 1956), 15; and Good, , “New Data on Engineering Education,” 39. On Pennsylvania College, see Sack, , History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, 2: 459. On the City Academy, see Good, , “New Data on Engineering Education,” 45, citing National Intelligencer, 2 Jan. 1839.Google Scholar

38 See Calhoun, , American Civil Engineer, 141–42, for a brief account of the negative impact of the depression on American engineering employment. For Princeton, see Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 216. For Pennsylvania College, see Sack, , History of Higher Education in Pennsylvania, 2: 459. For William and Mary, see Gianniny, , “Overlooked Southern Approach,” 156; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 195–98. For Columbia, see Fitch, , History of the School of Engineering, 20; and Smith, , “Historical Development of Technical Education,” 229. For New York University, see Jones, , New York University, 309, For Alabama, see Norrell, , A Promising Field, 17–27. For Virginia, see Gianniny, , “Overlooked Southern Approach,” 154–55. For Rensselaer Institute, see Rezneck, , Education for a Technological Society, 73. For Hanover College, see Calhoun, , American Civil Engineer, 46, citing Report of the Board of Trustees of Hanover College (Indiana General Assembly, Documentary Journal, 1836/37), 2; and Millis, William A., The History of Hanover College from 1827 to 1927 (Hanover, Ind., 1927), 46. For the University of Michigan, see Regents' Proceedings with Appendixes and Index, 1837–1864 (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1915), 13; and Donnelly, , The University of Michigan, 3: 1161.Google Scholar

39 For Northwestern, see Ward, Estelle Frances, The Story of Northwestern University (New York, 1924), 21, 35. For Illinois College, see Rammelkamp, Charles H., Illinois College: A Centennial History, 1829–1929 (New Haven, Conn., 1928), 169. For the University of the South, see Chitty, Arthur B. Jr., Reconstruction at Sewanee: The Founding of the University of the South and Its First Administration, 1857–1872 (Sewanee, Tenn., 1954), 69; and Warren, , Notes on Polytechnic Schools, 7. For Jefferson College, see Coleman, , Banners in the Wilderness, 86, 237. For Wisconsin, see Carpenter, Stephen H., An Historical Sketch of the University of Wisconsin from 1849 to 1876 (Madison, Wis., 1876), 28–29, 31; University of Wisconsin, Catalog for the Year ending December, 1858, 50, 72, 65; and Thwaites, Reuben Gold, ed., The University of Wisconsin: Its History and Its Alumni, with Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Madison (Madison, Wis., 1900), 69, 72, 72n. For the University of Albany, see “Engineers and Mechanics College,” American Railroad Journal 27 (1854): 217; and Rezneck, , Education for a Technological Society, 88–89. For the University of Nashville, see Merriam, Lucius S., Higher Education in Tennessee (Washington, D.C., 1893), 47–48.Google Scholar

40 Hofstadter, and Hardy, , Higher Education in the United States, 21. Other examples are: “The Engineering Schools of the United States, I,” Engineering News 27 (19 Mar. 1892): 277; Mann, , Study of Engineering Education, 4, 5; and Finch, James Kip, Trends in Engineering Education: The Columbia Experience (New York, 1948), 12.Google Scholar

41 Burke, , American Collegiate Populations, 4748.Google Scholar

42 Burritt, Bailey B., Professional Distribution of College and University Graduates, United States Bureau of Education Bulletin, no. 19 (Washington, D.C., 1912), 91, 97, 109, 139, 140; Burke, , American Collegiate Populations, 154, 190–91.Google Scholar

43 For Virginia, see Adams, Herbert B., Thomas Jefferson and the University of Virginia (Washington, D.C., 1888), 166. For VMI, see Couper, , One Hundred Years at V.M.I., 1: 353; Good, , “New Data on Engineering Education,” 44–45, citing Commonwealth (Frankfort, Ky.), 20 Apr. 1836, and citing National Intelligencer, 2 Jan. 1839. The large number of antebellum colleges offering engineering and surveying instruction in B.A., unspecialized B.S., and “partial” or “select” courses makes it conceivable that many of the so-called self-trained or apprentice-trained engineers of the first three-quarters of the nineteenth century may have, in fact, received some formal introduction to engineering skills at the collegiate level. McGivern, , First Hundred Years, 73. McGivern does not give the source for his data, and it may be low for Rensselaer. Rezneck, , Education for a Technological Society, 109, gives data indicating that Rensselaer had graduated 142 students in civil engineering by 1854. Some RPI engineering graduates may never have practiced the profession, and this may account for the discrepancy.Google Scholar

44 See, for example, Calhoun, , The American Civil Engineer, 4750; and Calvert, , The Mechanical Engineer in America, 59, 72–73.Google Scholar

45 Stone, Winthrop E., “The Development of Engineering Education in the Land-Grant Colleges,” in Semi-Centennial Celebration of Michigan State Agricultural College, ed. Blaisdell, Thomas C. (East Lansing, Mich., 1908), 115, noted that “in nearly every instance” the demand for instruction in “mechanic arts” (that is, engineering) “greatly exceeded” the demand for instruction in agriculture in the Morrill land-grant schools. Chittenden, , History of the Sheffield Scientific School, 228–30, noted the same trend. See also Williams, Roger L., The Origins of Federal Support for Higher Education: George W. Atherton and the Land-Grant College Movement (University Park, Pa., 1991), 179.Google Scholar