Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T05:32:38.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education and Status in Stuart England: The London Physician

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

James L. Axtell
James L. Axtell*
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Seventeenth-Century England was a “one-class society,” characterized by a tiny minority of men—at best four or five percent of the population—who “owned most of the wealth, wielded the power and made all the decisions, political, economic and social for the national whole.” Admission to this charmed circle was open to those who could “live without manual labour” and could “bear the port, charge and countenance of a gentleman.” This included not only those of noble blood and ancient riches, but “whosoever studieth the laws of this realm, who so abideth in the university giving his mind to his books, or professeth physic and the liberal sciences.” The physician, as a student of the liberal sciences and a member of an ancient and venerable profession, was accorded gentle status, unlike the great majority of gentlemen, because of his intellectual qualifications, his mastery of the art and science of healing the sick—and much else. If we would begin to understand this somewhat unusual relationship between education and social status, a question that still engages the sociologist and historian of modern society, the practitioners of London, especially the fellows, candidates, and licentiates of the Royal College of Physicians, provide a valuable focus, for it was from these men that the most fruitful medical advances of the century came and it was they who served as models for the physicians of the English towns and countryside for many years to come.

Type
Research Article
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Summer 1970 , pp. 141 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 History of Education Quarterly 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Laslett, Peter, The World We Have Lost (London: Methuen, 1965), p. 26.Google Scholar

2. Harrison, William, Description of Britain in Holinshed, Raphael, Chronicles of England (London, 1577), quoted in Laslett, op. cit., p. 38.Google Scholar

3. Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A., The Professions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933), pp. 284–87.Google Scholar

4. Marquis of Lansdowne, The Petty Papers (London: Constable, 1927), II, 169.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., II, 168–69.Google Scholar

6. Diary of the Rev. John Ward [1648–79], ed. Severn, Charles (London, 1839), p. 242.Google Scholar

7. Merrett, Christopher, A Short View of the Frauds, and Abuses Committed by Apothecaries (London, 1669), p. 51.Google Scholar

8. Munk, William, The Roll of the Royal College of Physicians of London (London: Royal College of Physicians, 1878), I, 205–479. Mark Curtis has shown that 37 percent of the fellows admitted between 1559 and 1642 had received their medical education abroad. Oxford and Cambridge in Transition, 1558–1642 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 154.Google Scholar

9. Raach, John H., A Directory of English Country Physicians 1603–1643 (London: Dawsons of Pall Mall, 1962), p. 14.Google Scholar

10. Goddard, Jonathan, A Discourse setting forth the Unhappy Condition of the Practice of Physick in London (London, 1670; written 1665), p. 12.Google Scholar

11. Ong, W. J., “Latin Language Study as a Renaissance Puberty Rite,” Studies in Philology, LVI (1959), 103–24.Google Scholar

12. Thomas Browne, Sir, letter to Henry Power, in The Letters of Sir Thomas Browne, ed. Keynes, Geoffrey (London: Faber and Faber, 1946), p. 278.Google Scholar

13. Gailhard, Jean, The Compleat Gentleman (London, 1678), pp. 38, 41.Google Scholar

14. Goddard, Jonathan, Discourse pp. 12–13. Dispensations from the Congregation of Regents could reduce those periods by one or two terms if the student was capable.Google Scholar

15. Curtis, Mark, Oxford and Cambridge in Transition p. 153; Allen, Phyllis, “Medical Education in 17th-century England,” Journal of the History of Medicine, I, 1 (January 1946), 115–43.Google Scholar

16. Hamilton, Bernice, “The Medical Professions in the 18th Century,” Economic History Review, 2nd ser., IV, 2 (1951), 141–69.Google Scholar

17. Withers, Thomas, A Treatise on the Errors and Defects of Medical Education (York, 1794; written c. 1774), quoted in Bernice Hamilton, “The Medical Professions,” p. 147.Google Scholar

18. Some Animadversions of a Licentiate and The Case of the Licentiates against the College of Physicians, both quoted in Bernice Hamilton, “The Medical Professions,” p. 148.Google Scholar

19. Allen, Phyllis, “Medical Education,” pp. 119–25; Sinclair, H. M. and Robb-Smith, A. H. T., A Short History of Anatomical Teaching in Oxford (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950), pp. 10–17.Google Scholar

20. Eachard, John, The Grounds and Occasions of the Contempt of the Clergy and Religion Enquired Into (London, 1670), in Works (London, 1774), I, 162. See also Goddard, Jonathan, Discourse, p. 51, and Merrett, Christopher, A Short View, p. 41.Google Scholar

21. Munk, William, The Roll of the Royal College I, 205–479. Francis Brown warned in The Case of the College of Physicians (n.d.) that apothecaries getting into the practice of medicine would “deprive the Gentry of one of the Professions by which their Younger Sons might honourably subsist” (Bernice Hamilton, “The Medical Professions,” p. 164). The career of John Bidgood, the son of an Exeter apothecary, is fairly typical of the education, expenses, and social mobility of a seventeenth-century physician. Munk, The Roll of the Royal College, I, 348–50.Google Scholar

22. Brown, Thomas, Physic Lies a Bleeding (London, 1697), p. 23.Google Scholar

23. Morris, Claver, The Diary of a West Country Physician A.D. 1684–1726 ed. Hobhouse, E. (London: Simpkin, Marshall, 1934), 30 June-14 July 1691.Google Scholar

24. Diary of the Rev. John Ward, p. 12.Google Scholar

25. Merrett, Christopher, A Short View p. 41.Google Scholar

26. The Journal of James Yonge (1647–1721), Plymouth Surgeon, ed. Poynter, F. N. L. (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1963), pp. 215–16.Google Scholar

27. George Clark, Sir, A History of the Royal College of Physicians (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965–1966), I, 405–409. This discrimination against the licentiates had surprisingly few repercussions until the eighteenth century, when they rebelled and secured privileges commensurate with the amount of money they were forced to pay.Google Scholar

28. Maynwaring, Everard, Medicus Absolutus. The Compleat Physitian, Qualified and Dignified (London, 1668), p. 50.Google Scholar

29. Merrett, Christopher, A Short View p. 35. Tom Gallypot, one of the practicing apothecaries in Dr. Thomas Brown's Physic Lies a Bleeding, exclaimed at a conversational opening, “O that I could think of a short Saying in the Classicks relating to this Matter. I vow 'twas a smart one, I remember it in English,” and went on to confuse Tacitus, Suetonius, Horace, and Ovid with each other, admitting that he has “now almost forgot [Latin], except Physick-Latin” (pp. 14–15). See also Pitt, Robert, The Craft and Frauds of Physick Expos'd (London, 1702), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

30. Although we should not entirely believe John Aubrey that Harvey “understood Greek and Latin pretty well, but was no critique, and he wrote very bad Latin,” it must be remembered that Sir George Ent, M.D., F.R.C.P., translated the Circulation and the Generation of Animals into readable Latin. On the whole, however, his Latin “was no better and no worse than that of many of his contemporaries.” Aubrey, John, Brief Lives, ed. Clark, Andrew (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1898), I, 301; Whitteridge, Gweneth, ed., The Anatomical Lectures of William Harvey (Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone, 1964), p. xxi.Google Scholar

31. The Letters of Sir Thomas Browne, p. 33 (12 August 1668) and p. 79 (21 July 1676).Google Scholar

32. Harrison, John and Laslett, Peter, The Library of John Locke (Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 1965), p. 19.Google Scholar

33. Goddard, Jonathan, Discourse p. 26; Sir George Clark, A History of the Royal College, I, 276.Google Scholar

34. George Clark, Sir, A History of the Royal College I, 281, 291.Google Scholar

35. George Clark, Sir, Ibid. I, 287.Google Scholar

36. Pharmacopoila Justificati, or Apothecaries Vindicated from the Imputation of Ignorance (London, 1724), p. 24, quoted in Bernice Hamilton, “The Medical Professions,” p. 163.Google Scholar

37. No. 172 (15 November 1695). Another service that Houghton offered was the finding of qualified physicians for towns that had none. No. 254 (11 June 1697); no. 299 (16 April 1698).Google Scholar

38. No. 3256 (24 January 1696–1697).Google Scholar

39. July 1702, pp. 420–24; September 1703, pp. 552–56. The longest review by far that the Works printed was a thirty-four-page account of Daniel LeClerc's Histoire de la Medicine (Amsterdam, 1701), which ran through August, September, and October.Google Scholar

40. Nos. 129, 136 (8 March 1695). The London Gazette (no. 3054) for 14–18 February 1695 also announced the sale.Google Scholar

41. The Diary of John Evelyn, ed. de Beer, E. S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955), V, 206.Google Scholar

42. Aubrey, John, Brief Lives I, 298–99.Google Scholar

43. From the sale catalogue. Bishop, W. J., “Some Medical Bibliophiles and Their Libraries,” Journal of the History of Medicine, III, 2 (Spring 1948), 251–52.Google Scholar

44. See The Diary of a West Country Physician, ch. 2, for the habits of a prominent Wells physician.Google Scholar

45. The Journal of James Yonge, pp. 213–14.Google Scholar

46. Stimson, Dorothy, “The Critical Years of the Royal Society, 1672–1703,” Journal of the History of Medicine, II, 3 (Summer 1947), 283–98; Sir Lyons, Henry, The Royal Society 1660–1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944), ch. 3.Google Scholar

47. Gillispie, Charles, “Physick and Philosophy: A Study of the Influence of Glocester not long since, that hee imagined that physitians, of all Royal Society,” Journal of Modern History, XIX (1947), 215–17.Google Scholar

48. Henry Lyons, Sir, The Royal Society p. 341.Google Scholar

49. Pocock, J. G. A., “Robert Brady, 1627–1700. A Cambridge Historian of the Restoration,” Cambridge Historical Journal, X, 2 (1951), 186–204.Google Scholar

50. Thomas Browne, Sir, Religio Medici ed. Denonain, Jean-Jacques (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1955), p. 5. “One told the Bishop of Glocester not long since, that hee imagined that physitians, of all other men, were the most competent judges of all others in affairs of religion; and his reason was, because they are wholly unconcerned in the matter.” Diary of the Rev. John Ward, p. 100.Google Scholar

51. Gillispie, Charles, “Physick and Philosophy,” p. 213.Google Scholar