Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:50:03.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

College Admissions, International Competition, and the Cold War in Asia: The Case of Overseas Chinese Students in Taiwan in the 1950s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ting-Hong Wong
Ting-Hong Wong*
Affiliation:
Sociology Institute of Academia Sinica in Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Focusing only on education exchanges between the United States and other countries, existing scholarship fails to illuminate how American-sponsored student migrations between other countries helped expand U.S. hegemony. This article attempts to rectify this limitation by looking at Taiwan's policies on overseas Chinese students (qiaosheng) in the 1950s. After the debacle of the Chinese Civil War and its retreat to Taiwan, the Kuomintang (KMT) sought to solicit overseas Chinese support and to counter Communist China's drive for “returning students.” The KMT-developed qiaosheng program faced difficulties until 1954, when the United States, seeing that Taiwan's project could serve its anti-Communist plan, started bankrolling the qiaosheng program, thereby enabling the KMT to lure more students away from Communist China. These findings suggest that overlooking U.S.-sponsored student migrations between nations outside the United States renders our analysis of international education exchanges and American imperialism incomplete.

Type
Articles
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 331 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jarvinen, Lisa, “Educating the Sons of the Revolution: The Cuban Educational Association, 1898–1902,” in Teaching America to the World and the World to America: Education and Foreign Relations Since 1870, ed. Garlitz, Richard and Jarvinen, Lisa (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 73–91; and Kenneth, B. O'Brien, “The Cuban Educational Association: An Early Experiment in International Education,” Journal of Negro Education 32, no. 1 (January 1963), 6–15.Google Scholar

2 Bu, Liping, Making the World Like Us: Education, Cultural Expansion, and the American Century (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), 24–26; Hunt, Michael H., “The American Remission of the Boxer Indemnity: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Asian Studies 31, no. 3 (May, 1972), 539–59; Li, Hongshan, US-China Educational Exchange: State, Society, and Intercultural Relations, 1905–1950 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2008); and McKee, Delber, “The Boxer Indemnity Remission: A Damage Control Device?” Newsletter: Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations 22, issue 1 (January 1991), 1–20.Google Scholar

3 Bu, Making the World Like Us, 145–47; Espinosa, José Manuel, Inter-American Beginnings of US Cultural Diplomacy, 1936–1948 (Washington, DC: Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, US Department of State, 1976); Haines, Gerald K., “Under the Eagle's Wing: The Franklin Roosevelt Administration Forges an American Hemisphere,” Diplomatic History 1, no. 4 (1977), 373–88. On the foreign student policy of Germany in the 1930s, see Bodo, Bela, “Foreign Students in Nazi Germany,” East European Quarterly 37, no. 1 (March 2003), 19–50.Google Scholar

4 The literature on U.S. imperialism and international students after WW II is extensive. See, for instance, Bevis, Teresa Brawner and Lucas, Christopher J., International Students in American Colleges and Universities: A History (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Bu, Making the World Like Us; Kramer, Paul A., “Is the World Our Campus? International Students and US Global Power in the Long Twentieth Century,” Diplomatic History 33, no. 5 (November 2009), 775–806; Lebovic, Sam, “From War Junk to Educational Exchange: The World War II Origins of the Fulbright Program and the Foundations of American Cultural Globalism, 1945–1950,” Diplomatic History 37, no. 2 (April 2013), 280–312; Loss, Christopher P., Between Citizens and the State: The Politics of American Higher Education in the 20th Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 121–61; and Unger, Corinna R., “The United States, Decolonization, and the Education of Third World Elites,” in Elites and Decolonization in the Twentieth Century, ed. Dülffer, Jost and Frey, Marc (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 241–61.Google Scholar

5 Bu, Making the World Like Us; Kramer, “Is the World Our Campus?” 779.Google Scholar

6 “Imperial power” refers in this case to dominant nations’ influence extended through long-distance networks and connections. This notion of imperial power is adapted from Kramer, Paul A., “Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World,” American Historical Review 116, no. 5 (December 2011), 1348–50.Google Scholar

7 Most literature on U.S. cultural diplomacy, like that on international students discussed here, predominantly examines movements of personnel, ideas, and funding between the United States and other countries. It seldom investigates U.S.-sponsored cultural exchanges taking place elsewhere, nor does it examine the impacts of such interchanges on U.S. global influence. Some examples include the following: Richard Garlitz, “US University Advisors and Education Modernization in Iran, 1951–1967,” in Garlitz et al., Teaching America to the World, 195–215; Hsu, Madeline Y., “Chinese and American Collaborations through Educational Exchange during the Era of Exclusion, 1872–1955,” Pacific Historical Review 83, no. 2 (May 2014), 314–32; Leroux, Karen, “Sarmiento's Self-Strengthening Experiment: Americanizing Schools for Argentine Nation-Building,” in Garlitz et al., Teaching America to the World, 51–71; Popkewitz, Thomas S., ed., Inventing the Modern Self and John Dewey: Modernities and the Traveling of Pragmatism in Education (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005); Sobe, Noah W., “American Philanthropy and Reconstruction in Europe after World War I: Bringing the West to Serbia,” in American Post-conflict Education Reform: From the Spanish-American War to Iraq, ed. Sobe, Noah W. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 75–101; Yaremko, Jason M., “‘The Path of Progress': Protestant Missions, Education, and US Hegemony in the ‘New Cuba,’ 1898–1940,” in Sobe, American Post-conflict Education Reform, 53–74; and Zimmerman, Jonathan, Innocents Abroad: American Teachers in the American Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

8 The Republic of China was founded in 1912 after the Double Ten Revolution overthrew the Qing (Manchu) Empire in the previous year. Until the success of the Northern Expedition in 1927, however, the KMT's power base was in the south, while northern China was controlled by a number of warlords.Google Scholar

9 Ha, Ng-Lun Ngai and Yan, Chang Chak, “Xainggang huawen jiaoyu fazhan yu zhongguo de guanxi” [China and the Development of Chinese Education in Hong Kong], in Liangci shijie daizhan qijian zai yazhou zhi haiwai huaren [Overseas Chinese in Asia between the Two World Wars], ed. Ha, Ng-Lun Ngai and Yan, Chang Chak (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong, Overseas Chinese Archives, 1989), 169–85.Google Scholar

10 Overseas Chinese refers to Chinese nationals residing outside China. The Nationality Law of the Republic of China, promulgated in 1929, adopted the principle of jus sanguinis and recognized any person born of a Chinese father, or of a Chinese mother where the father's nationality was unknown or indeterminate, as a Chinese citizen, regardless of place of birth. The KMT regime kept this legislation after evacuating to Taiwan. Fitzgerald, Stephen, China and the Overseas Chinese: A Study of Peking's Changing Policy, 1949–1970 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1972), 6–7.Google Scholar

11 Oyen, Meredith, “Communism, Containment and the Chinese Overseas,” in The Cold War in Asia: The Battle for Hearts and Minds, ed. Yangwen, Zheng, Liu, Hong, and Szonyi, Michael (Boston: Brill, 2010), 59–93.Google Scholar

12 The Ministry of Education decreed in 1947 that the following three categories of students were qiaoshengs: (1) those who graduated from a qiaoxiao and possessed a birth certificate of a foreign country or had resided abroad for at least three years, (2) Taiwan students who graduated from a middle school in Japan and had a residence permit issued by the Japanese government, and (3) students who had completed secondary education in a qiaoxiao in Hong Kong or Macau and held a birth certificate issued by the governments of those two places or a foreign country. “Huaqiao xuesheng youdai banfa” [Rules for Preferential Treatments for Overseas Chinese students], Ministry of Education, 16 April 1947, Ministry of Education Records, Academia Historica, Taiwan (hereafter cited as MOE) file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

13 During that time, higher educational institutions in those regions, if they existed, for the most part taught in the languages of the (former) colonizers and seldom admitted students from Chinese schools.Google Scholar

14 Ovendale, Richard, “Britain, the United States, and the Recognition of Communist China,” Historical Journal 26, no. 1 (March 1983), 138–58.Google Scholar

15 “Huaqiao xuesheng youdai banfa,” MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

16 “Qiaosheng toukao taishengnei zhuanke yishang xuexiao youdai banfa” [Rule for Preferential Treatment for Overseas Chinese Students Applying for Postsecondary Schools in Taiwan], MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

17 Education Department, Taiwan Provincial Government to Taiwan Provincial Normal College, 17 June 1950, Archival Division, National Taiwan Normal University (hereafter cited as NTNU) file 100.20-7-1-0390001012-01.Google Scholar

18 National Taiwan University to the Ministry of Education, 26 September 1951, National Taiwan University; Archival Division, National Taiwan University (hereafter cited as NTU) file 0040/2400301/001/0013.Google Scholar

19 qiaoshengs, Besides, students from frontier areas in China (bianjiansheng) and mountainous regions in Taiwan (shandisheng) also enjoyed such preferential treatment. “Yijiwuyi ruxuekaoshi chengji dengjibiao” [Tabulation of Results in National Taiwan University Entrance Exam, 1951], undated, Teaching Affairs Section [jiaowuchu], NTU file 0040/2400301/001/0013.Google Scholar

20 Qiaowu huiyi shilu [A Record of a Conference for Overseas Chinese Affairs] (Taipei: Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee Editorial Board, 1953), 45.Google Scholar

21 “Yijiwuer ruxuekaoshi chengji dengjibiao” [Tabulation, Results in National Taiwan University Entrance Exam, 1952], September 1952, NTU file 0041/2400300/008/0003.Google Scholar

22 Qiaowu huiyi shilu, 45.Google Scholar

23 “Qiaosheng toukao taishengnei zhuanke yishang xuexiao youdai banfa,” MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

24 “Qiaowuweiyuanhui zhidao qiaosheng huiguo shengxue shixian” [Regulations for Guiding Overseas Chinese Schools Returning to China for Education], Promulgated on 16 November 1933, in Zhonghua minguo fagui daquan, diyi ce [Legislations in the Republic of China: A Complete Collection, Volume One], ed. Baiqi, Xu (Nanjing: The Commercial Press, 1936), 1308.Google Scholar

25 Ministry of Education to Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Penang, 4 June 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

26 “Shisi niandu shuqi baosung huaqiao xuesheng shengxue zhuyi shixian” [Guidelines for Recommending Overseas Chinese Students, 1951], MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

27 MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

28 “Shangtao gangao gaozhong biyesheng laitai toukao xuexiao banfa jilu” [Minutes, on Hong Kong and Macau Senior Middle Students Coming to Take Colleges’ Entrance Exams in Taiwan], 4 June 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

29 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 24 August 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

30 Fu, the National Taiwan University President to the Ministry of Education, 27 July 1949, NTU file 0038/2400301/001/0007.Google Scholar

31 Ministry of Education, National Archives, Taiwan (hereafter cited as MOENA) file 0038/140.18-08; Fu to the Ministry of Education, 28 July 1950, NTU file 0039/2400301/001/0010.Google Scholar

32 Guoli taiwan daxue xiaokan [Bulletin of the National Taiwan University], no. 145 (December 1951), 3.Google Scholar

33 “Shengli shifan xueyuan xueze” [Academic Regulations of the Taiwan Provincial Normal College], Taiwan shengli shifan xueyuan yuankan [Bulletin of the Taiwan Provincial Normal College], no. 13 (March 1950), 4.Google Scholar

34 Chiang, Min-Hua, “The US Aid and Taiwan's Post-War Economic Development, 1951–1965,” African and Asian Studies 13 (2014), 104; and Jacoby, Neil H., US Aid to Taiwan, a Study of Foreign Aid, Self-Help and Development (New York: Praeger, 1966).Google Scholar

35 Zhongyang ribao (Central Daily, Taiwan), 20 September and 5 November 1950.Google Scholar

36 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 20 August 1951, MOE file 0190000000329A.Google Scholar

37 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 24 August 1951, MOE file 0190000000329A.Google Scholar

38 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 4 June 1952, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

39 Principal, Tak Ming School, Hong Kong to the Ministry of Education, 2 March 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

40 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 28 May 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

41 Foreign Ministry to the Ministry of Education, 12 January 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

42 Wen Wei Pao (Hong Kong), 29 March 1952.Google Scholar

43 Taylor, Robert, China's Intellectual Dilemma: Politics and University Enrolment, 1949–1978 (Vancouver: University of British Columbia, 1981), 29.Google Scholar

44 In the 1950s, universities and colleges in China were quite willing to accept revolutionary cadres, party members, and workers and peasants without formal academic qualifications. In the 1960s, before the Cultural Revolution, tertiary education institutions in China had three criteria for student admission, namely, applicants’ academic achievement, class background, and political performance. Academic achievement could sometimes be less important than the other two criteria. Pepper, Suzanne, Radicalism and Education Reform in 20th-century China: The Search for an Ideal Development Model (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Shirk, Susan L., Competitive Comrades: Career Incentives and Student Strategies in China (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982); and Taylor, Robert I., Education and University Enrolment Policies in China, 1949–1971 (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1973).Google Scholar

45 MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

46 Qiaowu huiyi shilu, 45; Zhongyang Ribao, 21 September 1954; and Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to Ministry of Education, 16 October 1954, MOE file 019000000332A.Google Scholar

47 Re, Lu Zhi, an overseas Chinese in Thailand, to Chiang Kai-Shek, the President of ROC, 16 January 1952, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

48 Zhongyang Ribao, 10 February 1951.Google Scholar

49 Qiaowu huiyi shilu, 71–72; and Xing, Zhang, Preserving Cultural Identity through Education: The Schools of the Chinese Community in Calcutta, India (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2010).Google Scholar

50 The Third Section, Central Reform Committee of the KMT to the Ministry of Education, 22 December 1951, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

51 The Ministry of Education to the Third Section, Central Reform Committee of the KMT, undated, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

52 “Shangtao gangao gaozhong biyesheng laitai toukao xuexiao banfa jilu,” [Minutes on Hong Kong and Macau Senior Middle Students].Google Scholar

55 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee and the Ministry of Education to the Executive Yuan, 30 June 1951, MOE file 019000000329A.Google Scholar

54 Qiaowu huiyi shilu, 45.Google Scholar

55 Zhongyang Ribao, 16 October 1951.Google Scholar

56 Notes, Zhong Zheng, Ministry of Education, 8 May 1952, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

57 Cheng, Chen, Premier of Executive Yuan, to Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 6 August 1952, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

58 Notes, Zhong Zheng, Ministry of Education, 8 May 1952; Ministry of Education to Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 25 June 1952; Ministry of Education to Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 1 July 1952; and the Ministry of Education to the National Taiwan University, 19 August 1952. All from MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

59 Qiaowu huiyi shilu, 45; Zhongyang Ribao, 3 September 1952.Google Scholar

60 Tsang, Steve, “Unwitting Partners: Relations between Taiwan and Britain, 1950–58,” East Asian History 7 (June 1994), 105–20; Tsang, Steve, “Strategy for Survival: The Cold War and Hong Kong's Policy towards Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Activities in the 1950s,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 20, no. 2 (May 1997), 294–317.Google Scholar

61 Although the Hong Kong government generally acquiesced in students going to Taiwan, it had to ensure such outward flow of students would not provoke Beijing's objection or lead to the danger of anti-Beijing confrontations in the colony. Hence, in 1954, the United Kingdom's Foreign Office protested against Taipei for giving qiaoshengs from Hong Kong military training at Cheng-Kung Hill—a military training base that drilled new recruits and operated short-term training for male college students—during the summer vacation. Files of Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), Public Records Office, Kew, London, 371/110298. The British authorities also had to avoid being perceived by Beijing as assisting Taipei's qiaosheng campaign in Hong Kong.Google Scholar

62 Zhongyang Ribao, 11 July 1952.Google Scholar

63 The other two tertiary institutions were the National Taiwan University and the National Defense Medical Center. The former was under the Ministry of Education, the latter under the Ministry of Defense.Google Scholar

64 Zhongyang Ribao, 13 August 1952.Google Scholar

65 Wong, Ting-Hong, Hegemonies Compared: Chinese School Politics in Postwar Singapore and Hong Kong (New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2002), 222.Google Scholar

66 620.2a Education With Overseas Chinese (1953), The Chinese Civil War and U.S.-China Relations: Record of the U.S. State Department's Office of Chinese Affairs, 1945–1955, US National Archives and Records Administration, in Archives Unbound available online for free when visiting any National Archives facility or by subscription through local or university libraries. Hereafter referred to as OCA.Google Scholar

67 “Gongfei xishou haiwai huaqiao qingnian guiguo shengxue zhi yanjiu” [A Study on the Communist Bandits’ Campaign to Absorb Returning Overseas Chinese Students], 24 September 1953, Section Two of the Ministry of Defense, MOE file 019000000331A.Google Scholar

68 Beijing made this move to demonstrate that it had no intention of using Chinese sojourners to plot subversion overseas. By doing so, it sought to undercut the U.S. strategy of isolating China in Southeast Asia. Fitzgerald, China and the Overseas Chinese; and Glen Peterson, Overseas Chinese in the People's Republic of China (New York: Routledge, 2012), 124–25.Google Scholar

69 670.1 U.S. Assistance to or Sponsorship of Education (1951), OCAGoogle Scholar

70 620.2a Education with Overseas Chinese (1953), OCA.Google Scholar

71 “Xingzhengyuan qiaowu jiantao huiyi jilu” [Minutes, Reappraising Policies on Overseas Chinese Affairs, the Executive Yuan], 3 December 1952, Xingzhengyuan huiyi yishiricheng [Chronicles of Meetings, the Executive Yuan], no. 273, 24 December 1952.Google Scholar

72 In some overseas regions, such as Thailand, the state authorities outlawed Chinese middle schools, and in other localities, Chinese secondary schools were not available because the Chinese community was too small to sustain such institutions.Google Scholar

73 “Haiwai qiaosheng laitai shengdu zhongdeng xuexiao banfa” [Rules for Overseas Chinese Students Coming to Taiwan for Secondary Education], promulgated by the Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee and the Ministry of Education on 7 April 1953, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Records, Academia Historica, Taiwan (hereafter cited as MFA) file 0190000003028A; and Qiaowu yuebao [Overseas Chinese Affairs Monthly], no. 10 (April 1953), 14.Google Scholar

74 “Huoguo shengxue qiaosheng, minguo sishi zhi sishi niandi zhi” [Returning Overseas Chinese Students, from 1951 to late 1956], undated, MFA 020000003029A.Google Scholar

75 Zhongyang Ribao, 3 and 24 September 1953.Google Scholar

76 Yeh, George K. C., the Foreign Minister of the Republic of China to Cheng Yen-Fen, Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, MFA file 0190000003028A.Google Scholar

77 Zhongyang Ribao, 3 and 24 September 1953.Google Scholar

78 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 8 August 1951, MOE file 019000000329A; and Qin, Yang Chi, an overseas Chinese student from the Philippines, to the Ministry of Education, 27 September 1952, MOE file 019000000330A.Google Scholar

79 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 26 June 1954, MOE file 019000000331A.Google Scholar

80 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 6 November 1953, NTU file 0042/2400300/009/0003.Google Scholar

81 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 16 September 1954, MOE file 019000000332A.Google Scholar

82 “Shangtao gangao diyipi luqu xuesheng ditai jiedai zhusu shiyi huiyi jilu” [Minutes, on Receiving the First Batch of Qiaosheng], 16 October 1953, NTU file 0042/2400300/009/0003.Google Scholar

83 Chen Cheng to the Ministry of Education, 29 September 1953, MOE file 019000000331A.Google Scholar

84 Yu Hong-Jun to the Ministry of Education, 29 November 1953, MOE file 0190P0000331A.Google Scholar

85 Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee to the Ministry of Education, 29 October 1953, MOE file 019000000331A.Google Scholar

86 Ministry of Education to Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 26 December 1953, MOE file 019000000331A.Google Scholar

87 “Di erbalingyici xingzheng huiyi jilu” [Minutes, the 201st Administrative Meeting], Guoli taiwan daxue xiaokan [Bulletin of the National Taiwan University], no. 175 (August 1952), 2.Google Scholar

88 Qiaowu yuebao, no. 10 (April 1953), 16; and Guoli taiwan daxue xiaokan, no. 241 (December 1953), 2.Google Scholar

89 The Ministry of Education later blocked this move, NTU file 0042/2400300/009/0003.Google Scholar

90 Yan-Fen, Cheng, Wangshi yishu [Reminiscences] (Taipei: Zhuanji wenxue chubanshe, 1972), 130.Google Scholar

91 Meiyuan youguan jiaoyu shishi baogao [A Report on the Education Project Funded by US assistance] (Taipei: National Bureau of Education Information, 1957), 52–53.Google Scholar

92 Meiyuan jiaoyu jibua jiantao [Reappraising Education Projects Funded by US Assistance] (Taipei: Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, 1964), 14–15,27,31.Google Scholar

93 Zhongyang Ribao, 12 May 1954.Google Scholar

94 “Chuxi guomindang disanzu cedong haiwai qiaosheng huiguo shengxue zuotan” [Report, a Conference for Enlarged Recruitment for Overseas Chinese Students], the Third Section, KMT, 4 May 1955, MFA 020000003029A.Google Scholar

95 In 1954 the Ministry of Education instructed the NTU to take 670 qioashengs; the Taiwan Provincial Normal College and the Taiwan Provincial College of Engineering, 150 each; and the Taiwan Provincial College of Agriculture, 30. It also asked the Chien Kuo Middle School and the Taipei First Girls’ High School—the two most prestigious secondary institutions in Taiwan—to accept 100 and 50 qiaoshengs, respectively. Zhongyang Ribao, 12 May 1954.Google Scholar

96 Zhongyang Ribao, 19 June and 24 July 1954.Google Scholar

97 Ministry of Education to the Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 24 December 1954, MOE file 019000000332A. These stipends could cover a substantial portion of the qiaoshengs’ living costs, because in 1954 the average annual income and the expenditure per capita in Taiwan were only NT$2,864 and NT$2,172, respectively. Statistical Abstract of National Income (Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Republic of China, 2015), 1.Google Scholar

98 In 1955, the official exchange rate in Taiwan was U.S.$1 to approximately NT$15, but overseas Chinese students got around NT$21 from each U.S. dollar remitted. The KMT authorities allowed each qiaosheng in tertiary institutions a maximum remittance of U.S.$200 enjoying such a favorable rate annually; for those attending middle schools, the annual limit was U.S.$160 per student. “Xingzhengyuan jingji anding weiyuanhui diershibaci huiyi yijue tongzhi” [Notification, Decision of the 28th Meeting of the Economic Stabilization Board, the Executive Yuan], 16 July 1954, MOE file 019000000332A.Google Scholar

99 Qiaosheng jiaoyu jihua yunyong meiyuan chengguo jiantao [Reappraising Projects of Overseas Chinese Students Funded by US Assistance] (Taipei: Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, 1966), 18.Google Scholar

100 Zhongyang Ribao, 3 March 1954 and 9 April 1955.Google Scholar

101 The Ministry of Education to the Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee, 14 July 1954, MOE file 019000000332A.Google Scholar

102 “Benniandu gangao zhaosheng wenti zuotanwu jilu” [Minutes, a Forum on Recruitment of Students from Hong Kong and Macau], 1955, 17 May 1955, MFA file 020000003029A.Google Scholar

103 “Sishiwu niandu gangao ge gaojizhongxue baosong chengji youliang biyesheng laitai shengxue banfa” [Rules for Recommending Outstanding Senior Middle Students in Hong Kong and Macau for Further Education in Taiwan], NTNU file 100.35-44-1-0450001400A-02.Google Scholar

104 Meiyuan youguan jiaoyu shishi baogao, 56.Google Scholar

105 Guoli taiwan daxue xiaokan, no. 268 (October 1954), 1; Taiwan shengli shifan xueyuan yuankan [Bulletin of Taiwan Provincial Normal College], no. 80 (September 1954), 318; and Chenggong daxue linian jieshou meiyuan yunyong chengguo jiantao [Evaluating Projects of Cheng Kung University Funded through US Assistance] (Taipei: Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, 1964), 7.Google Scholar

106 “Sishiwu niandu wuxue lianzhao weiyuanhui changwu weiyuanhui disanci huiyi jilu” [Minutes, the Third Meeting, General Subcommittee, the Joint College Entrance Examination Committee], 13 July 1955, NTU file 0044/2400300/011/0001/031-2.Google Scholar

107 Ministry of Education to National Taiwan University, 14 June 1957, NTU file 0046/2400300/013/0003.Google Scholar

108 “Huoguo shengxue qiaosheng, minguo sishi zhi sishi niandi zhi,” [Returning Overseas Chinese Students, from 1951 to late 1956].Google Scholar

109 NTNU file 291.04-1-2-0451010090-03.Google Scholar

110 From 1962 to 1992, the 20,472 qiaoshengs who graduated from these preuniversity courses were all given places in higher education. Among these graduates, 14,831 (72 percent) were assigned to public institutions, which in Taiwan are more prestigious than their private counterparts. In the three decades under review, 5,964 (29 percent) of the students completing the program were allocated to the NTU. Moreover, between 1988 and 1992, only 15 percent of the students enrolled in that program failed to graduate. One can safely infer from these figures that many qiaoshengs with unimpressive academic records entered public universities after the one-year course. Guoli qiaosheng daxue xiansiuban gaiguang [The National Overseas Chinese Experimental Senior High School: An Introduction] (Taipei: Guoli qiaosheng daxue xiansiuban, 1994), 1–4, 55–58.Google Scholar

111 Mei-Rong, Guan, Daxue ruxue kaoshi zhidu yu jiaoyu kongzhi: taiwan diqu de lishi kaocha, 1949 to 2001 [University Entrance Examination and Education Control: The Historical Case of Taiwan, 1949 to 2001] (PhD dissertation, National Cheng Chi University, Taiwan, 2005); and Zhongyang Ribao, 11 July 1954.Google Scholar

112 Figures derived from Qiaosheng jiaoyu jihua yunyong meiyuan chengguo jiantao, 6.Google Scholar

113 The U.S. assistance to the qiaosheng program was funded through two currencies: Taiwanese and U.S. dollars, and the latter constituted only about 5 percent of the project's budget. This funding for qiaoshengs was spent through two state sectors: the Ministry of Education and the Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee. The former handled the funding distributed to individual schools, and the latter took charge of subsidies for students’ travel and living expenses. The NT$65 million that the National Taiwan University received mentioned here does not include the amount given in U.S. dollars and that dispensed through the Overseas Chinese Affairs Committee. Taiwan daxue linian jieshou meiyuan yunyong chengguo jiantao [Evaluating National Taiwan University Projects Funded through U.S. Assistance] (Taipei: Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development, 1966), 1, 7.Google Scholar

114 Ibid., 10–12.Google Scholar

115 Ibid., 6–7.Google Scholar

116 Chenggong daxue linian jieshou meiyuan yunyong chengguo jiantao; Shifan daxue linian jieshou meiyuan yunyong chengguo jiantao [Evaluating the Normal University's Projects Funded through U.S. Assistance] (Taipei: Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development), 1964.Google Scholar

117 Daqi, Chen, President, National Cheng Chi University, to the Committee of the 1955 Joint College Entrance Examination, 15 July 1955, NTU file 044005852R.Google Scholar

118 Zhongbua Mingguo Nianjian, minguo sishiqinian [Yearbook of the Republic of China, 1958] (Taipei: Zhonghua Mingguo Nianjianshe, 1958), 416–17.Google Scholar

119 Ibid., 416; Zhonghua Mingguo Nianjian, minguo wushiwunian [Yearbook of the Republic of China, 1966] (Taipei: Zhonghua Mingguo Nianjianshe, 1966), 591.Google Scholar

120 Guoli taiwan daxue yanjiusuo gaikuang [Graduate School of the National Taiwan University: An Introduction] (Taipei: the National Taiwan University, 1969).Google Scholar

121 “Huoguo shengxue qiaosheng, minguo sishi zhi sishi niandi zhi,” [Returning Overseas Chinese Students, from 1951 to late 1956], MFA 020000003029A.Google Scholar

122 The National Taiwan University to Young Lions News Agency, 30 May 1956, NTU file 0045/2400300/012/0001/005.Google Scholar

123 Ministry of Education to the National Taiwan University, 9 April 1957; and National Taiwan University to the Ministry of Education, 15 May 1957. Both from NTU file 0046/2400300/013/0001.Google Scholar

124 Figures derived from “Linian baosong kaochu ji shiji huiguo shengxue rensu” [Annual Statistics on Qiashengs Getting Admissions Offers and Overseas Students Who Accepted Such Offers and Attended Schools in Taiwan], Bainian Shuren [Education: A Hundred Years Project] (Taipei: Huaqiao chubianshe, 1967).Google Scholar

125 I write “various professional fields in Chinese communities throughout Asia” here because the general impression is that most qiaoshengs were employed by schools, business companies, and media operated by the Chinese after returning to their home countries.Google Scholar

126 “Daizhuan biye qiaosheng dongtai bijiao” [Statistics on Qiaoshengs Returning to Homelands, Going to Foreign Countries for Employment or Education, and Staying in Taiwan after Graduation], Bainian Shuren. Google Scholar

127 “Daizhuan biye qiaosheng jiuye leibie” [Occupations of Qiaoshengs after Graduation], Bainian Shuren. Google Scholar