Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T07:41:09.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Nineteenth-Century Views on the University Curriculum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

J. P. Powell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many contemporary disputes about higher education have their origins in the nineteenth century, and it may well be the case that closer attention to these earlier controversies would help to clarify our own thinking on what are basically the same problems. My purpose here is to follow the fortunes of the family of concepts and theories relating to the university curriculum to bring out both the persistence of the problems and the varying strategies which have been adopted in the attempts to resolve them. Questions of this nature can never be finally answered but it is most important that they be constantly discussed. One of the most striking features of current talk about the universities is the absence of any widespread awareness of the historical background to the debate: the extensive nineteenth century literature on higher education has been largely forgotten and traditional issues are canvassed in a manner which suggests that they are a product of the mid-twentieth century.

Type
Research Article
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1965 , pp. 97 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © 1965, University of Pittsburgh Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Curtis, M. H., Oxford and Cambridge in Transition 1558–1642 (1959).Google Scholar

2. Ibid., 227.Google Scholar

3. Winstanley, D. A., The University of Cambridge in the Eighteenth Century (1922), 5.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., quoted on p. 6.Google Scholar

5. Whewell, W., In a fly-sheet printed in 1848; quoted in Winstanley: Early Victorian Cambridge (1940), 202.Google Scholar

6. I am indebted to Dr.Clark, Kitson for drawing my attention to the importance of this factor.Google Scholar

7. Todhunter, I., The Conflict of Studies (1873), p. 12.Google Scholar

8. Ibid., 5.Google Scholar

9. Hamilton, W., On the Study of Mathematics as an Exercise of Mind (1836). Reprinted in Discussions on Philosophy and Literature, Education and University Reform (1853), 273.Google Scholar

10. Ibid., 275.Google Scholar

11. Ibid., 282.Google Scholar

12. This struggle has been documented in great detail by Davie, G. E.: The Democratic Intellect (1961).Google Scholar

13. Ibid., quoted pp. 170–171.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., 175.Google Scholar

15. Loc. cit., 322.Google Scholar

16. Hamilton, loc. cit., 801.Google Scholar

17. Cardwell, D. S. L., The Organization of Science in England (1957), 45.Google Scholar

18. Hamilton, loc. cit., 788.Google Scholar

19. Hamilton, loc. cit., 763.Google Scholar

20. Newman, J. H., The Idea of the University (edit. C. F. Harrald, 1947), 95–96.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., 157. The remainder of this section gives details of his conception of the liberally-educated man which it is the prime function of the universities to produce.Google Scholar

22. Todhunter, I., The Conflict of Studies (1873), 134.Google Scholar

23. Quoted in Armytage, W. H. G. Civic Universities (1955), 197.Google Scholar

24. Green, V. H. H., Oxford Common Room (1957), 184.Google Scholar

25. Pattison, M., Suggestions for Academical Reform (1868).Google Scholar

26. Todhunter, loc. cit., 132. Both Hamilton and Huxley spoke out strongly on this issue, e.g. Hamilton: “No other Universities possess such mighty means; but in none are the means so unprofitably expended …” Discussions, etc., 784.Google Scholar

27. Cardwell, D. S. L., The Organization of Science in England (1957).Google Scholar

28. Winstanley, D. A., Later Victorian Cambridge (1947), 115.Google Scholar

29. Huxley, T. H., Man's Place in Nature and Other Essays (1906), 281.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., 238. Conant, Cf. J. B., The Education of American Teachers (1963): “It seems to me, however, that a prescription of general education is impossible unless one knows, at least approximately, the vocational aspirations of the group in question,” 85.Google Scholar

31. Huxley, , ibid., 249. Conant, Cf. J. B., The Education of American Teachers (1963): “I shudder, as do many others, when I hear it argued that ‘any subject properly taught can be considered as part of a liberal education’,” 91.Google Scholar