Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:03:20.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Schools, the Courts, and Social Progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Irving G. Hendrick
Irving G. Hendrick*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Reviews
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1977 , pp. 71 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by New York University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Edwards, Newton, The Courts and the Public Schools, rev. ed. (Chicago, 1955), p. 549.Google Scholar

2. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar

3. Wollenberg, , All Deliberate Speed, p. 2.Google Scholar

4. Students of school desegregation and the law may find the subject explored in greater legal depth in Horowitz, Harold W. and Karst, Kenneth L., Law, Lawyers and Social Change, Cases and Materials on the Abolition of Slavery, Racial Segregation, and Inequality of Educational Opportunity (Indianapolis, 1969).Google Scholar

5. Faubus, Governor Orval E. ordered the National Guard to bar the students for the stated purpose of preserving public peace. His own segregationist credentials had been severely challenged in the 1956 Democratic Party primary election by former State Senator James Johnson, a candidate who ran on a “white supremacy” platform.Google Scholar

6. Necessarily, the Warren Court could not and did not ignore legal precedent. While calling attention to important social changes which had occurred in society since the Supreme Court affirmed the separate but equal doctrine in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), it cited three cases on segregation in graduate-level higher education: Missouri ex rel. Gains v. Canada, 305 U.S. 3371 (1938); Sweatt, v. Painter, , 339 U.S. 629 (1950); McLaurin, v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, 339 U.S. 637 (1950).Google Scholar

7. Ward v. Flood, 48 Cal. 36 (1874).Google Scholar

8. Mendez, et al. v. Westminster School District of Orange County et al., 64 F. Supp. 544 (1946).Google Scholar

9. Jackson v. Pasadena City School District, 59 Cal. 2d 876, 382 P. 2d 878, 31 Cal Rpt. 606 (1963).Google Scholar

10. Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, et al., 339 F. Supp. 1315 (1971).Google Scholar