No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Phi Beta Kappa: The Invention of an Academic Tradition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Extract
The rise of the modern American university between the Civil War and the Great Depression is a familiar story. In this relatively short span of time America acquired a host of universities that offered extensive graduate training, stressed research over teaching, and largely abandoned the prescribed common curriculum in favor of greater individual choice. Some of these new universities, like Chicago, Cornell, and Stanford, were created ex nihilo. Others, like Yale and Princeton, were gradually transformed from small, clerically directed, classically oriented denominational colleges into modern secular universities.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1988 by the History of Education Society
References
1 Hofstadter, Richard, and Smith, Wilson, eds., American Higher Education: A Documentary History, 2 vols. (Chicago, 1961); Rudolph, Frederick, The American College and University: A History (New York, 1965); Laurence R. Veysey, The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, 1965).Google Scholar
2 Chambers, John W., The Tyranny of Change: America in the Progressive Era, 1900–1917 (New York, 1980); Chandler, Alfred D., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977); Ellis Hawley, The Great War and the Search for a Modern Order: A History of the American People and Their Institutions (New York, 1979); Gabriel Kolko, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History (New York, 1963); Robert H. Wiebe, The Search for Order, 1877–1920 (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Robert Bocock, Rituals in Industrial Society: A Sociological Analysis of Ritualism in Modern England (London, 1974); Gillis, John R., For Better, For Worse: British Marriages, 1600 to the Present (New York, 1985); Eric Hobsbawm and Terrence Ranger, eds., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge, Eng., 1983).Google Scholar
4 Veysey, American University, 314-15.Google Scholar
5 Moffatt, Michael, “Inventing the ‘Time-Honored Traditions’ of ‘Old Rutgers': Rutgers Student Culture, 1858–1880,” Journal of the Rutgers University Libraries 47 (June 1985): 1–22.Google Scholar
6 Veysey, , American University, ch. 5; Paula S. Fass, The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920's (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
7 Quoted in Hastings, William T., Phi Beta Kappa as a Secret Society with Its Relations to Freemasonry and Antimasonry (Washington, D.C., 1965), 41.Google Scholar
8 McLachlan, James, “The ‘Choice of Hercules': American Student Societies in the Early Nineteenth Century,” in The University in Society, ed. Stone, Lawrence (Princeton, N.J., 1974), 2: 449-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Hastings, , Secret Society, 1–11.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., 55, 89-91.Google Scholar
11 Voorhees, Oscar M., The History of Phi Beta Kappa (New York, 1945), chaps. 3-5. John Quincy Adams recalled that one Phi Beta Kappa meeting held in August 1786 at “Freeman, and Little's Chamber” included “Freeman read[ing] a short Dissertation upon the love of our neighbour; Little and Packard [offering] a Forensic on the Question, whether the present scarcity of money in this Commonwealth be advantageous to it. [To this question] Harris and Andrews, were the extempore disputants.” David Grayson Allen et al., eds., The Diary of John Quincy Adams (Cambridge, Mass., 1981), 2: 87.Google Scholar
12 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 42–47, 109.Google Scholar
13 Adams, , Diary, 2: 447.Google Scholar
14 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 43-44.Google Scholar
15 Veysey, , American University, 32–65.Google Scholar
16 Adams, , Diary, 284.Google Scholar
17 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 59–68. Ill will toward Phi Beta Kappa centered in large measure on the special recognition that the society received from the college administration, as well as from its insistence upon secrecy. At Harvard, the special privileges granted to Phi Beta Kappa provoked considerable debate not only among students, but even among college overseers. Secret societies aroused considerable anxiety within the early republic. During the 1780s, many feared that the secret Society of Cincinnati was attempting to foist an aristocracy upon the newly independent American nation. Some Federalists in the late 1790s and early 1800s argued that certain secret societies, such as errant branches of the Masons and the rumored existence of Jacobin clubs in America, posed a severe threat to the stability of the republic. This attack on secret societies fostered an intense internal debate in the Yale chapter, with some arguing that Phi Beta Kappa should vote itself out of existence because of the threat posed by secret societies. For a discussion of the debate surrounding the Society of Cincinnati see: Merrill Jensen, The New Nation: A History of the United States during the Confederation, 1781–1789 (New York, 1950); Myers, Minor Jr., Liberty without Anarchy: A History of the Society of the Cincinnati (Charlottesville, Va., 1983); and Wallace Evan Davies, Patriotism on Parade: The Story of Veterans’ and Hereditary Organizations, 1783–1900 (Cambridge, Mass., 1955). An examination of the controversy surrounding Phi Beta Kappa and the fear that it possibly threatened the social order can be found in Hastings, Secret Society, 12-42.Google Scholar
18 Phi Beta Kappa Anniversary Meeting Minutes, 28 Aug. 1834, file number HUD 3684.554, Phi Beta Kappa Records, Harvard University Archives, Cambridge, Mass. (hereafter HU Archives); Voorhees, Phi Beta Kappa, 147-51.Google Scholar
19 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 194–97.Google Scholar
20 Phi Beta Kappa Anniversary Meeting Minutes, 11 Aug. 1831, 13 Sept. 1831, file number HUD, 3684.554, Phi Beta Kappa Records, HU Archives. See also William Coolidge Lane, ed., Catalogue of the Harvard Chapter of Phi Beta Kappa (Cambridge, Mass., 1912), 152-54.Google Scholar
21 Phi Beta Kappa Anniversary Meeting Minutes, 30 Aug. 1839, file number HUD 3684.554, Phi Beta Kappa Records, HU Archives; Lane, Catalogue, 160.Google Scholar
22 Story, Ronald, The Forging of an Aristocracy: Harvard and the Boston Upper Class, 1800–1870 (Middletown, Conn., 1980), 154–55; Lane, Catalogue, 63-78.Google Scholar
23 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 128–36, 170-81.Google Scholar
24 Lane, , Catalogue, 174–76; Story, Forging an Aristocracy, 154-55.Google Scholar
25 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 220–27.Google Scholar
26 Bagg, Lyman H. [By a Graduate of ‘69], Four Years at Yale (New Haven, Conn., 1871), 234–35.Google Scholar
27 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 255–56.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., 270-76.Google Scholar
29 Parsons, E. B., Phi Beta Kappa Handbook and General Address Catalogue of the United Chapters (North Adams, Mass., 1900), 6–8.Google Scholar
30 For example: Edward E. Hale, “A Fossil from the Tertiary,” Atlantic Monthly 44(July 1879): 98–106; Bayard Quincy Morgan, ed., Phi Beta Kappa: Alpha of Wisconsin Catalogue (Madison, Wis., 1917).Google Scholar
31 Copeland, Arthur, Men and Days in Phi Beta Kappa (Newark, N.Y., 1907), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Axelrod, Alan, ed., The Colonial Revival in America (New York, 1985); Paul Boyer, Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920 (Cambridge, Mass., 1978); David Glassberg, “Public Ritual and Cultural Hierarchy: Philadelphia's Civic Celebrations at the Turn of the Century,” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 107(July 1983):421-48; John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism: 1860–1925 (New Brunswick, N.J., 1955); Michael G. Kammen, A Season of Youth: The American Revolution and the Historical Imagination (New York, 1978).Google Scholar
33 Glassberg, “Public Ritual”; Higham, Strangers in the Land; Kammen, A Season of Youth. Google Scholar
34 Hastings, , Secret Society, 55.Google Scholar
35 Hastings, William T., The Insignia of Phi Beta Kappa (Washington, D.C., 1964), 5–18.Google Scholar
36 Ibid., 27-31.Google Scholar
37 United Chapters of Phi Beta Kappa, A Ritual of Phi Beta Kappa, 1913 pamphlet in William Lane's General Correspondence, file number HUD 3684.704, Phi Beta Kappa Records, HU Archives.Google Scholar
38 Ibid. To trace further changes in the initiation ceremony over the course of the twentieth century see: Sixteenth National Council, United Chapters of Phi Beta Kappa, A Ritual of Phi Beta Kappa, 1928 pamphlet; and United Chapters of Phi Beta Kappa, The Phi Beta Kappa Society Form of Initiation, 1956 pamphlet, both in Records of the Corresponding Secretary, 1934–1960, Phi Beta Kappa Records, Rutgers University Archives, New Brunswick, N.J. (hereafter RU Archives).Google Scholar
39 “The Alpha of Massachusetts,” Phi Beta Kappa Key 1(Mar. 1911): 28.Google Scholar
40 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 242. See also Chapter Minutes, 1869–1901, Phi Beta Kappa Records, RU Archives; and Historical Volume: The Fiftieth Anniversary of the Alpha of New Jersey of the Phi Beta Kappa Society (New Brunswick, N.J., 1920) in Memorabilia Series, Phi Beta Kappa Records, RU Archives.Google Scholar
41 Parsons, , Handbook, 14, 252.Google Scholar
42 Robson, John W., Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities 19th ed. (Menasha, Wis., 1977).Google Scholar
43 Although Phi Beta Kappa originally began as an all-male fraternity, little significant opposition emerged toward the admission of women as members during the last quarter of the nineteenth century. The University of Vermont became the first to admit women as full members and a year later the Wesleyan College chapter decided that gender should not enter into membership decisions. Since the opportunity to belong to Phi Beta Kappa was primarily accorded on the basis of scholastic achievement (i.e., class rank), it became difficult for chapters at coeducational chapters to justify the exclusion of women. Once this precedent had been set, the way was paved for the creation of new chapters at a select group of women's colleges. Vassar was the first women's college to win a charter from the United Chapters, and by 1910, Barnard, Smith, and Mount Holyoke had chapters. The admission of women to Phi Beta Kappa may have been made more acceptable to men, in part, because most chapters were at all-male colleges where Phi Beta Kappa membership could extend only to men by virtue of the makeup of the student body. For further information on the admission of women to Phi Beta Kappa see Voorhees, Phi Beta Kappa, 261-63.Google Scholar
44 William Lane to Henry C. Chiles, 27 July 1912, Chiles, Henry C. to William Lane, 16 Nov. 1915, [William Lane?] to Henry C. Chiles, 19 Nov. 1915, Elmer C. Griffith to William Lane, 26 Nov. 1915, [William Lane] to Elmer C. Griffith, 2 Dec. 1915, [Oscar Harnett?] to William Lane, 3 Dec. 1915, Application for Phi Beta Kappa chapter file, file number HUD 3684.704, Phi Beta Kappa Records, HU Archives.Google Scholar
45 Wiebe, , Search for Order, ch. 5.Google Scholar
46 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 285–86.Google Scholar
47 “Proceedings of the Eleventh National Council: Report of the Committee on Fraternity Policy,” Phi Beta Kappa Key 2(Oct. 1913): 33–38.Google Scholar
48 Voorhees, , Phi Beta Kappa, 317.Google Scholar
49 Ibid., 326-42.Google Scholar
50 Veysey, , American University.Google Scholar
51 Ibid.; see also Fass, American Youth. Google Scholar
52 Dexter, Edwin G., “High-Grade Men: In College and Out,” Popular Science Monthly 62 (Mar. 1903): 429–35.Google Scholar
53 “The Alpha of Massachusetts,” 28.Google Scholar