Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:47:26.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Praise of Great Men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Clarence Karier*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essay Review I
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by History of Education Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Hearnshaw, L. S., Cyril Burt, Psychologist (Ithaca, 1979), p. vii.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 234.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 245.Google Scholar

4 Jensen, Arthur R., “How Much Can We Boost I.Q. and Scholastic Achievement?Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 39 (1969): 1123.Google Scholar

5 Hearnshaw, , Cyril Burt, p. 8.Google Scholar

6 Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 35.Google Scholar

9 As quoted in, Ibid., p. 68.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., p. 75.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 291.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., p. 274.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., p. 273.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., p. 271.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 271.Google Scholar

16 Ibid., p. 273.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., p. 269.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 285.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., p. 319.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., p. 264.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 10.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 144.Google Scholar

23 For example, see Arnold's, Matthew essay on “Democracy” and his essay on “Culture and Anarchy” in Trilling, Lionel, The Portable Matthew Arnold (New York: 1949), p. 436 and p. 469.Google Scholar

24 Hughes, Thomas, Tom Brown's Schooldays (London, 1952), p. 332.Google Scholar

25 Hesse, Hermann, Magister Ludi: The Glass Bead Game (New York, 1972), p. 204.Google Scholar

26 A larger question of the nature of criticism itself is important to consider. The life blood of any scholarly profession depends on tough critical argument and debate. A disturbing characteristic of the recent argument involving Arthur Jensen with respect to Negro intelligence in America has been not that he hasn't been criticized, but that many of the more serious charges against his work go unanswered. For example, see Hirsch, Jerry, “Jensenism: The Bankruptcy of ‘Science’ Without Scholarship,” United States Congressional Record, Vol. 122: No. 73, E2671–2; No. 74, E2693–5; No. 75, E2703–5, E2716–8, E2721–2, 1976. (Originally published in Educational Theory, 1975, Vol. 25:3–27.) Google Scholar

27 Cronbach, Lee J., “Hearnshaw on Burt,” Science, Vol. 206, (December 21, 1979): 1392.Google Scholar

28 Hearnshaw, , Cyril Burt, pp. 286287.Google Scholar

29 Hesse, , Magister Ludi, p. 332.Google Scholar