Article contents
Charles W. Eliot and the Secondary School
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2017
Extract
Charles W. Eliot brought to the chairmanship of the Committee of Ten a background of more than twenty years' concern about and interest in secondary schools. In April 1892, the president of the Massachusetts Association of Classical and High School Teachers said that Eliot had been “with us” since 1870 as “a most original, stimulating, inspiring, and, I may almost say, provoking force.” He added that it was “no small distinction to this body that President Eliot, by all odds the leader in American education today, got some portion of his training in the arena of debate which we provided him.”
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1961, University of Pittsburgh Press
References
Notes
1. “Opening Remarks by the President,” Academy, VII (1892), 190.Google Scholar
2. Mayo, A. D., “The Demands of the Coming Century on the American Common School,” NEA Proceedings 1876, 24.Google Scholar
3. “The Massachusetts State Teachers' Association,” Academy, V (1891), 558.Google Scholar
4. Commissioner of Education, Report for the Year 1889–90, II, 1388–89, 1486–87.Google Scholar
5. Eliot, C. W., “Shortening and Enriching the Grammar School Course,” NEA Proceedings 1892, 617.Google Scholar
6. Eliot, C. W., “Can School Programmes be Shortened and Enriched?” Atlantic Monthly, MXII (1888), 250–58; C. W. Eliot, “Standards of Admission to College,” Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the Middle States and Maryland, Proceedings 1896, 79.Google Scholar
7. Eliot, , “Shortening and Enriching the Grammar School Course,” 623.Google Scholar
8. Ibid., 622.Google Scholar
9. Eliot, C. W., “The Gap between the Elementary Schools and the Colleges,” National Educational Association, Journal of Proceedings and Addresses, 1890, 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Eliot, C. W., “Undesirable and Desirable Uniformity in Schools,” NEA Proceedings 1892, 90.Google Scholar
11. Ibid., 91.Google Scholar
12. Eliot, , “Shortening and Enriching the Grammar School Course,” 623.Google Scholar
13. Eliot, , “Undesirable and Desirable Uniformity in Schools,” 94.Google Scholar
14. Robinson, Oscar D., “The Work of the Committee of Ten,” School Review, II (1894), 366.Google Scholar
15. Cited in ibid., 368.Google Scholar
16. Eliot, C. W. to Angell, James B., Nov. 18, 1893, James B. Angell Papers, Michigan Historical Collections of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
17. Eliot, C. W. to Tetlow, John, Dec. 5, 1893, John Tetlow Papers, Houghton Library, Harvard.Google Scholar
18. Eliot, C. W. to Angell, James B., Dec. 8, 1893, James B. Angell Papers.Google Scholar
19. Eliot, C. W., “Comments at the Eighth Annual Meeting of the New England Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools,” School Review, I (1893), 617.Google Scholar
20. Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies (New York, 1894), 51–52, 53.Google Scholar
21. Parker, Francis W., “The Report of the Committee of Ten,” NEA Proceedings 1894, 449.Google Scholar
22. Journal of Education, XXXIX (1894), 152.Google Scholar
23. Educational Review, VII (1894), 405.Google Scholar
24. Eliot, C. W. to Butler, N. M., Mar. 1, 1894, C. W. Eliot Papers, Harvard University Archives.Google Scholar
25. Stanley Hall, G., NEA Proceedings 1894, 663.Google Scholar
26. Butler, N. M., NEA Proceedings 1894, 666.Google Scholar
27. Eliot, C. W. to Angell, James B., Dec. 8, 1893, James B. Angell Papers.Google Scholar
28. Eliot, C. W., “The Unity of Educational Reform,” Educational Review, VIII (1894), 209–26.Google Scholar
29. Remsen Bishop, J., NEA Proceedings 1894, 789–91.Google Scholar
30. Forman, S. E., “Civics in the Secondary School,” Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the Middle States and Maryland, Proceedings 1894, 54.Google Scholar
31. Cited in Educational Review, VIII (1894), 305–6.Google Scholar
32. Jacobs, W. B., “Values in Secondary Education,” Educational Review, IX (1895), 135.Google Scholar
33. Small, A. W., “Demands of Sociology upon Pedagogy,” NEA Proceedings 1896, 174–84.Google Scholar
34. Thurber, C. H., “Is the Present High-School Course a Satisfactory Preparation for Business?” NEA Proceedings 1897, 814.Google Scholar
35. Thurber, Samuel, “Courses of Study in Secondary Schools,” Journal of Education, XLI (1895), 99.Google Scholar
36. C. H. T., “Summer Meetings,” School Review, II (1894), 432.Google Scholar
37. De Garmo, Charles, “Report of the Committee of Ten,” Educational Review, VII (1894), 278–79, 276.Google Scholar
38. American Philological Association, “Address of the Committee of Twelve,” School Review, III (1895), 435–36.Google Scholar
39. “The New England Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools: Second Special Meeting,” School Review, III (1895), 152–84.Google Scholar
40. Eliot, C. W. to Tetlow, John, Jan. 1, 1895, John Tetlow Papers.Google Scholar
41. “Minutes of Department of Secondary Education,” NEA Proceedings 1896, 559.Google Scholar
42. Journal of Education, XLII (1895), 196.Google Scholar
43. Eliot, C. W., “Standards of Admission to College,” Association of the Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the Middle States and Maryland, Proceedings 1896, 85–86; C. W. Eliot, “Tendencies of Secondary Education,” Educational Review, XIV (1897), 424; C. W. Eliot, “Recent Changes in Secondary Education,” Atlantic Monthly, LXXXIV (1899), 436–37.Google Scholar
44. Eliot, C. W., “Election of Studies in Secondary Schools: Advantage to be Derived from its Introduction,” Educational Review, XV (1898), 442–49.Google Scholar
45. Eliot, C. W., “A Wider Range of Electives in College Admission Requirements,” Educational Review, XI (1896), 417–28.Google Scholar
46. Eliot, C. W., “Discussion,” Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools of the Middle States and Maryland, Proceedings 1899, 67–74.Google Scholar
47. Eliot, C. W., “Discussion,” NEA Proceedings 1900, 198.Google Scholar
48. Eliot, C. W., “The Function of Education in a Democratic Society,” Outlook, LV (1897), 571.Google Scholar
49. Stanley Hall, G., Adolescence (New York, 1904), II, 510–15.Google Scholar
50. Eliot, C. W., “The Fundamental Assumptions in the Report of the Committee of Ten,” Educational Review, XXX (1905), 330.Google Scholar
51. Ibid., 343–44.Google Scholar
52. Eliot, C. W., “Industrial Education as an Essential Factor in our National Prosperity,” National Society for the Promotion of Industrial Education, Proceedings 1908, Part I, Bulletin Number 5 of the Society, 12–13.Google Scholar
53. Eliot, C. W., Changes Needed in American Secondary Education (New York, 1916), 11–12.Google Scholar
54. Eliot, C. W., A Late Harvest (Boston, 1924), 141.Google Scholar
55. Kentucky Educational Association, Report of the Kentucky “Committee of Ten” (Lexington, 1895); Missouri State Teachers' Association, “Report of the Committee of the Missouri State Teachers' Association,” School Review, IV (1896), 546–48; J. H. Kirkland, “Report of the Committee on Program of Studies for Preparatory Schools,” School Review, VIII (1900), 72–75; R. W. Jones, “Our Proposed New Requirements for Admission to College,” School Review, IX (1901), 501–14.Google Scholar
56. Dexter, E. G., “Ten Years' Influence of the Report of the Committee of Ten,” School Review, XIV (1906), 254–59.Google Scholar
57. Educational Review, XXXII (1906), 106–7.Google Scholar
58. Ella Flagg Young, “The Educational Progress of the Last Two Years,” NEA Proceedings 1907, 394.Google Scholar
59. Butler, N. M., Across the Busy Years (New York, 1939), I, 198.Google Scholar
60. Cited in Journal of Education, XXXIX (1894), 168.Google Scholar
61. Ibid. Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by