Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:23:51.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Urban Liberalism and the ‘lost generation’: politics and middle class culture in Norwich, 1900–1935*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Barry M. Doyle
Barry M. Doyle
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article utilizes the metaphor of the post-war Lost Generation to investigate the chronology of middle class political realignment and Liberal decline. It suggests that the Liberalism of twentieth-century Norwich owed its existence to the perpetuation of a closed culture based on business, chapel and urban residence. It questions the degree to which dissenting Liberals had been assimilated into the dominant ideology before 1914 by reference to marriage ties and associational links such as the freemasons. It asserts that the downfall of this Liberal culture in the long run, though not immediately, was the result of the Great War, which allowed the younger generation to break out of their insular world and mix more freely with the Anglican upper-middle class. However, it also demonstrates that the closed culture was such that those of the Edwardian political generation, although affected by the War, did not reject their Liberalism. Most continued to actively support the party into the 1930s, questioning the view that the middle classes had largely deserted the Liberals by 1924. Rather, it was the political maturation in the 1930s of the War generation which heralded the end of urban Liberalism and the triumph of middle class Conservatism.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 617 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For recent discussions of this debate see Searle, G. R., The Liberal party: triumph and disintegration, 1886–1929 (London, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bentley, M., The climax of Liberal politics (London, 1987)Google Scholar; Tanner, D. M., Political change and the Labour party 1900–18 Cambridge, 1990), pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 For example, Cornford, J., ‘The transformation of Conservatism in the late nineteenth century’, Victorian Studies, VII (1963), 35–66Google Scholar; Bebbington, D. W., ‘Nonconformity and electoral sociology 1867–1918’, Historical Journal, XXVII (1984), 633–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the new Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Emy, H. V., Liberals, radicals and social politics 1892–1914 (Cambridge, 1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blewett, N., The peers, the parties, and the people: the British general elections of 1910 (London, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Searle, G. R., ‘The Edwardian Liberal party and business’, English Historical Review, XCVIII (1983), 28–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bernstein, G. L., Liberalism and Liberal politics in Edwardian England (London, 1986), especially ch. 1Google Scholar; Wald, K. D., Crosses on the ballot (Princeton, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Wilson, T., The downfall of the Liberal party 1914–1935 (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Douglas, R., A history of the Liberal party 1896–1971 (London, 1971)Google Scholar; George, L. Bernstein, ‘Yorkshire Liberalism during the First World War’, Historical Journal, XXXII (1989), 107–29Google Scholar; Turner, J., British politics and the Great War: coalition and conflict 1915–1918 (New Haven & London, 1991).Google Scholar

6 In addition to the above, see Cowling, M., The impact of Labour 1920–1924 (Cambridge, 1971)Google Scholar; Freeden, M., Liberalism divided: a study in British political thought 1914–1939 (Oxford, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Cook, C., The age of alignment: electoral politics in England 1922–1929 (London, 1975), p. 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Wilson, , Downfall, pp. 23–8.Google Scholar

9 The important exceptions are, Ramsden, J., The age qfBalfour and Baldwin 1902–1940 (London, 1978)Google Scholar; Bernstein, Liberalism; Searle, ‘Business’; Clarke, P. F., ‘The end of laissez-faire and the politics of cotton’, Historical Journal, XV (1972), 493–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cook, Alignment.

10 For a more detailed analysis of the culture and politics of Norwich see Barry, M. Doyle, ‘Middle class realignment and party politics in Norwich, 1900–1932’ (unpublished PhD. thesis, University of East Anglia, 1990).Google Scholar

11 Vera, Brittain, Testament of youth (London, 1933)Google Scholar; Winter, J. M., ‘Britain's “Lost Generation” of the First World War’, Population Studies, XXXI, 3 (1977), 449–66.Google Scholar

12 The main exceptions to this are Binfield, C., So down to prayers: studies in English nonconformity 1780–1920 (London, 1977), pp. 232–48Google Scholar and Binfield, C., ‘Et Virtuten et Musas: Mill Hill school and the Great War’, in Sheils, W. J. (ed.), The church and war: studies in church history, XX (Oxford, 1983), 351–82Google Scholar. See also Koss, S., Nonconformity in modem British politics (Hamden, Conn., 1975), pp. 126–44Google Scholar; Wilson, Downfall.

13 Joyce, P., Work, society and politics: the culture of the factory in later Victorian England (London, 1980), p. 40.Google Scholar

14 SirWemyss, Reid, ‘Last month’, The Nineteenth Century, LV (02. 1904), 337.Google Scholar

15 Corfield, P. J., The impact of English towns 1700–1800 (Oxford, 1982), chs. 1–2Google Scholar; Edwards, J. K., ‘Industrial development of the city 1800–1900’ in Barringer, C. (ed.), Norwich in the nineteenth century (Norwich, 1982), pp. 136–59Google Scholar; Census of England and Wales… County of Norfolk area (London, 1904), p. 1Google Scholar and (London, 1931), p. 1.

16 Fraser, W. Hamish, The coming of the mass market 1850–1914 (London, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edwards, , ‘Industrial development’, p. 137.Google Scholar

17 Hawkins, C. B., Norwich: a social study (London, 1910), pp. 12–72Google Scholar; Shaw, C., ‘The large manufacturing employers of 1907’, Business History, XXV (1983), 53, 59.Google Scholar

18 Cunningham, P., ‘Unemployment in Norwich during the nineteen thirties’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, 1990).Google Scholar

19 The Liberals, Conservatives and Labour all ran two candidates in the 1923 election. The sitting Conservative and Liberal candidates were both defeated and two Labour M.P.s were returned for the first time. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.), British parliamentary election results 1885–1918 (London, 1974), pp. 160–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Craig, F. W. S. (ed.), British parliamentary election results 1918–1949 (Glasgow, 1969), p. 206.Google Scholar

20 Eastern Daily Press, 22 Oct. 1932, p. 7.

21 The statistical material in this paper is drawn from a study of the backgrounds of 237 Conservative and 186 Liberal mayors, sheriffs, aldermen, councillors, council candidates, guardians and guardian candidates, who stood for office between 1895 and 1939. For a detailed discussion of the biographical sources used see Doyle, , Thesis, pp. 90–2 and footnotes.Google Scholar

22 Bignold, R., Five generations of the Bignold family 1761–1947 (London, 1948).Google Scholar

23 Blackman, J. M., ‘Henry James Copeman’, in Jeremy, D. J. (ed.), Dictionary of business biography, I (1984), 789.Google Scholar

24 Perkin, H., The origins of modern English society 1780–1880 (London, 1969), p. 435Google Scholar; Joyce, Work society and politics, ch. 1; Martin, J. Wiener, English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit (London, 1981), pp. 16–24Google Scholar; Coleman, D. C., ‘Gentlemen and players’, Economic History Review, 2nd Ser., XXVI (1973), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 For brief descriptions of Amersham Hall see Colman, H. C., Sydney Cozens-Hardy: a memoir (Norwich, 1944), pp. 16–19Google Scholar; Colman, H. C., Jeremiah James Colman by one of his daughters (London, 1905), pp. 241–3Google Scholar; Stuart, L. E., In memoriam: Alan Cozens-Hardy Colman (Norwich, 1898), pp. 8–15Google Scholar; Birrell, A., Things past redress, (London, 1937), pp. 40–3Google Scholar. I am indebted to Geoffrey Searle for the last reference.

26 See entries for White, the Jewsons, and Norman, Tillett in Who's who in Norwich (1961).Google Scholar

27 Birrell, , Things past redress, pp. 40–3.Google Scholar

28 Honey, J. R. S., Tom Browne's universe: the development of the Victorian public school (London and Dorset, 1977).Google Scholar

29 For example, Searle, , ‘Business’, p. 57Google Scholar; Ramsden, , Balfour and Baldwin, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar

30 M., Lisle-Williams, ‘Merchant banking dynasties in the English class structure: ownership, solidarity and kinship in the City of London 1850–1960’, British Journal of Sociology, XXXV (1984), 342–6Google Scholar; Rubinstein, W. D., ‘Wealth, elites and the class structure of modern Britain’, Past and Present, LXXVI (1977), 123–4.Google Scholar

31 For the importance of businessmen among the 1918 Conservative intake, and their prominent position among representatives from urban constituencies, see McEwen, J. M., ‘The coupon election of 1918 and Unionist Members of Parliament’, Journal of Modern History, XXXIV (1962), 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Edwards, , ‘Industrial development’, p. 137.Google Scholar

33 Wiener, , English culture, pp. 14–16.Google Scholar

34 Marrison, A. J., ‘Businessmen, industries and tariff reform in Great Britain 1903–1930’, Business History, XXV (1983), 148–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Semmel, B., Imperialism and social reform (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Rempel, R. A., Unionists divided (Newton Abbot, 1972)Google Scholar; Clarke, ‘Politics of cotton’.

35 For the depression in Norfolk agriculture see Barnes, P., Norfolk landowners since 1880 (Norwich, 1993)Google Scholar; Gourvish, T. R., Norfolk beers from English barley: a history of Steward and Patteson (Norwich, 1987).Google Scholar

36 Although Samuel Hoare, the country banker and sitting Conservative M.P., stood down at the 1906 election, he returned to contest the seat unsuccessfully in January 1910. Cross, J. A., Sir Samuel Hoare: apolitical biography (London, 1977), pp. 1–3Google Scholar. See also Rubenstein, , ‘Class structure’, p. 123.Google Scholar

37 Binfield, C., ‘An excursion into architectural cousinhood: the East Anglian connexion’, in Virgoe, N. & Williamson, T. (eds.), Religious dissent in East Anglia (Norwich, 1993), pp. 102–12Google Scholar; Salt, R., Plans for a fine city (Norwich, n.d. [1988]).Google Scholar

38 Hale, R. W., ‘Nonconformity in nineteenth century Norwich’, in Barringer, (ed.), Nineteenth century Norwich, pp. 176–98.Google Scholar

39 Colman, H. C., Prince's Street congregational church Norwich 1819–1919 (Norwich, 1919)Google Scholar; Jewson, C. B., The baptists in Norfolk (London, 1957)Google Scholar; Prince's Street congregational church yearbook (Norwich, 1912)Google Scholar; Handbook of the church and congregation worshipping in St Mary's baptist chapel, Norwich (Norwich, 1912).Google Scholar

40 The relationship between Liberalism and nonconformity is explored by Bebbington, ‘Electoral sociology’; Bebbington, D. W., The nonconformist conscience: chapel and politics 1870–1914 (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Koss, Nonconformity; Glaser, J., ‘English nonconformity and the decline of Liberalism’, American Historical Review, LXIII (1958), 352–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 They were, in chronological order, SirMorton, Peto, Colman, J. J., SirGeorge, White, SirGeoffrey, Shakespeare and Percy, JewsonBebbington, D. W., ‘Baptist M.P.s in the nineteenth century’, Baptist Quarterly, XXIX, 1 (1981), 3–24Google Scholar; Bebbington, D. W., ‘Baptist members of parliament in the twentieth century’, Baptist Quarterly, XXXI, 6 (1986), 252–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Bebbington, , ‘Electoral sociology’, pp. 646–7.Google Scholar

43 St. Mary's Magazine, XIV (Dec. 1909), 1.Google Scholar

44 Bebbingon, , ‘Electoral sociology’, pp. 646–7Google Scholar; Binfield, , Down to prayers, p. 203.Google Scholar

45 Muthesius, S., ‘Nineteenth century Norwich houses’, in Barringer, (ed.), Nineteenth century Norwich, pp. 94–118Google Scholar; O'Donoghue, R., ‘A Victorian suburb: some aspects of town planning in nineteenth century Norwich’, Norfolk Archaeology, XXXVIII, (1983), 321–8Google Scholar; Travers, P., ‘The changing pattern of prestige residence in Norwich, 1871 to 1971: a case study in the geography of segregation’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, 1984).Google Scholar

46 Doyle, B. M., ‘Gender, class and congregational culture in early twentieth century Norwich’, The Journal of the United Reformed Church History Society (1995).Google Scholar

47 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, pp. 106–9Google Scholar; St. Mary's handbook 1912; Prince's Street yearbook 1912; Doyle, ‘Congregational culture’.

48 Anon., 1910/1960: fifty years of Baptist witness. The story of Silver Road (Norwich, 1960)Google Scholar; Doyle, ‘Congregational culture’.

49 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, p. 148Google Scholar; Prince's Street Magazine (May 1929), p. 6Google Scholar; ‘Minutes of the Citizens League to combat the 1902 Education Act, 1902–14’, Norfolk Records Office [hereafter N.R.O.] FC6/23.

50 In the two generations between 1880 and 1930, these eight families supplied: three Liberal M.P.s; eight Liberal mayors; three Liberal sheriffs; two Liberal aldermen; two Liberal councillors; one Labour M.P.; one Labour alderman and one Labour councillor. Only the most prestigious office has been counted and, as most held more than one during their lives, their full impact on Norwich Liberalism was much greater. No member of any of these families held civic office as a Conservative in this period.

51 Joyce, , Work society and politics, p. 37.Google Scholar

52 ‘Records relating to the registration of Lodges of Freemasons in Norfolk: list of members and occupations of members of Walpole Lodge 1500 1925’, N.R.O./C/Scg 7/1/21; ‘Union Lodge of Freemasons: register of members 1864–1905’, N.R.O./SO9/26 465X; ‘Funeral of W. G. Stevens’, Eastern Daily Press, 17 Sept. 1925, p. 8.Google Scholar

53 ‘At Mousehold for the presentation of the colours by the king to the volunteers’, Eastern Daily Press, 26 Oct. 1909, p. 6Google Scholar, which gives a full list of the officers present. The Boys' Brigade Gazette, XXV, 10 (June 1917), 118–19.Google Scholar

54 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, p. 143.Google Scholar

55 Binfield, , ‘Mill Hill school’, p. 353.Google Scholar

56 United methodist circuit yearbook, 1914 (Norwich, 1915).Google Scholar

57 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, p. 143Google Scholar. See also Clements, K. W., ‘Baptists and the outbreak of the First World War’, Baptist Quarterly, XXVI (1975–1976), 74–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Henry, S. D., ‘Scottish Baptists and the First World War’, Baptist Quarterly, XXXI, 2 (1985), 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

58 United methodist circuit yearbook, 1914, p. 4; Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, pp. 144–5.Google Scholar

59 Colman, , Cozens-Hardy, pp. 57–8.Google Scholar

60 Peter, Kent, ‘Norwich 1914–18’, in Gliddon, G. (ed.), Norfolk and Suffolk in the Great War (Norwich, 1988), pp. 66–7.Google Scholar

61 A little chat about the 1st (City of Norwich) Battn Norfolk volunteers (Norwich, 1915), p. 18.Google Scholar

62 Mrs E. M. Copeman to Tom Copeman, 15 Dec. 1914, N.R.O./MC81/32/4.

63 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, pp. 148–9.Google Scholar

64 Eastern Daily Press, 24 April 1917.

65 Eastern Evening News, 7 May 1917; Eastern Daily Press, 20 Sept. 1918; B, M. Doyle, ‘Religion, politics and remembrance: a free church community and its Great War dead’, in Lunn, K. & Evans, M. (eds.), War and memory in the twentieth century (forthcoming).Google Scholar

66 Jewson, , Baptists in Norfolk, p. 147.Google Scholar

67 Wilson, , Downfall, pp. 23–8.Google Scholar

68 For Dorothea Jewson, see Bebbington, , ‘Twentieth century’, p. 281.Google Scholar

69 SirGeoffreyShakespeare, Bt. Shakespeare, Bt., Let candles be brought in (London, 1949), pp. 337–8.Google Scholar

70 For a generally pessimistic view of Liberalism in the immediate post-war years, Cook, Alignment, chs. 2–4.

71 Doyle, B. M., ‘A conflict of interests? The local and national dimensions of middle class Liberalism, 1900–1935’, Parliamentary History (forthcoming, 1997).Google Scholar

72 Lloyd George Liberal Magazine (Nov. 1921), pp. 185–7Google Scholar; Cook, , Alignment, p. 30Google Scholar; Campbell, J., Lloyd George: The Goat in the Wilderness (London, 1977)Google Scholar. For middle class support for Lloyd George in 1929, Eastern Daily Press, 27 Mar. 1929, p. 10 and 7 May 1929, p. 10.

73 Wayland, Young, ‘Edward Hilton Young, 1st Baron Kennett (1879–1960)’, Dictionary of national biography 1951–1960 (Oxford, 1971), pp. 1088–90Google Scholar; Campbell, , Goat, pp. 128–9.Google Scholar

74 William Keefe at a post-election meeting of the Gladstone Club, Norwich, , Eastern Daily Press, 2 Nov. 1920, p. 8.Google Scholar

75 For the rise of Labour in Norwich see Bernstein, G. L., ‘Liberalism and the progressive alliance in the constituencies 1900–1914: three case studies’, Historical Journal, XXVI (1983), 617–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cherry, S., Doing different? Politics and the Labour movement in Norwich 1880–1914 (Norwich, 1989)Google Scholar; Whitemore, F., ‘The Labour party, municipal politics and municipal elections in Norwich 1903–1933’ (unpublished paper, Norwich in the nineteenth and twentieth century, Norwich, 1986).Google Scholar

76 Eastern Daily Press, 22 Oct. 1932, p. 7; ‘Party in municipal affairs: Norwich plea for a new movement’, Norwich Mercury, 11 Nov. 1933, p. 7Google Scholar. I am very grateful to Fred Whitemore for drawing this letter to my attention.

77 For the Whites see Wheldon, F. W., A Norvic century: and the men who made it 1846–1946 (Norwich, 1946).Google Scholar

78 For example, Trainor, R., ‘Urban elites in Victorian Britain’, Urban History Yearbook (1985), p. 5Google Scholar; Yeo, S., Voluntary organizations in crisis (London, 1977)Google Scholar; Joyce, Work society and politics, ch. 1.

79 Cook, Alignment; Bebbington, , ‘Electoral sociology’, p. 655.Google Scholar

80 Craig, , Results, 1918–1949.Google Scholar

81 Wrigley, C., ‘A case of regional pride: collective bargaining in the Yorkshire woollen industry, 1919–1930’ (unpublished paper, C.O.R.A.L. conference, Norwich, 1986).Google Scholar