Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:35:14.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PURITANS, LAUDIANS, AND THE PHENOMENON OF CHURCH-BUILDING IN JACOBEAN LONDON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

J. F. MERRITT
J. F. MERRITT
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The comprehensive neglect of English church buildings in the century after the Reformation until the advent of Archbishop Laud has long stood as one of the standard readings of English church history. This article argues that attitudes towards the building and repair of churches in the pre-Laudian period were far more complex than has previously been recognized. It documents a sustained revival of church building and beautification in London that took place well before Laud's emergence, and which is inexplicable without reference to a whole range of practical and social, as well as religious, forces. This evidence, however, should not lead us to downplay the novelty and distinctiveness of the Laudian building programme. Rather, it is suggested here that Laudian polemic advanced a specific view of puritanism as incorporating a profane neglect and contempt of both church services and of the building which housed them. It is this vision of puritan neglect that not only provided a justification for Laudian changes to church practices and interiors in the 1630s, but which has also deflected the attention of later historians away from programmes of church repair in the reign of James I.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 935 - 960
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to all those who commented on earlier versions of this paper, which was first presented in Cambridge in 1994, and subsequently to seminars in Oxford, London, and Sheffield. I would also like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for a fellowship supporting my research on early Stuart London. All pre-1800 works were published in London unless otherwise stated.