Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:50:39.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty, Class, and Dependence in Early America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

A. Roger Ekirch
A. Roger Ekirch
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 1984 , pp. 493 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For two surveys of recent scholarship see Axtell, James, ‘The ethnohistory of early America: a review essay’, William and Mary Quarterly 3rd ser. xxxv, 1 (1978), 110–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wood, Peter H., ‘“I did the best I could for my day”: the study of early black history during the second Reconstruction, 1960 to 1976’, WMQ, 3rd ser. xxxv, 2 (1978), 185–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Menard, Russell R., ‘From servants to slaves: the transformation of the Chesapeake labor system’, Southern Studies, xvi, 4 (1977), 355–90Google Scholar.

3 See especially Menard, Russell R., ‘From servant to freeholder: status mobility and property accumulation in seventeenth-century Maryland’, WMQ, 3rd ser. xxx, 1 (1973), 37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Carr, Lois Green and Menard, Russell R., ‘Immigration and opportunity: the freedman in early colonial Maryland’, in Tate, Thad W. and Ammerman, David L., eds., The Chesapeake in the seventeenth century: essays on Anglo-American society and politics (Chapel Hill, 1979), pp. 206–42Google Scholar; Walsh, Lorena S., ‘Servitude and opportunity in Charles County, Maryland, 1658–1705’, in Land, Aubrey C. et al. , eds., Law, society, and politics in early Maryland (Baltimore, 1977), pp. 111–33Google Scholar.

4 Berthoff, Rowland and Murrin, John M., ‘Feudalism, communalism, and the yeoman freeholder: the American Revolution considered as a social accident’, in Kurtz, Stephen G. and Hutson, James H., eds., Essays on the American Revolution (Chapel Hill, 1973), pp. 256–88Google Scholar.

5 Mark, Irving, Agrarian conflicts in Colonial New York, 1711–1775 (Port Washington, 1965 [orig. publ. New York, 1940]), pp. 115–30Google Scholar; Lynd, Staughton, ‘Who should rule at home? Dutchess County, New York, in the American Revolution’, WMQ, 3rd ser. xvni, 3 (1961), 330–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Lockridge, Kenneth A., A Mew England town: thefirst hundredyears (New York, 1970)Google Scholar, ‘Land, population, and the evolution of New England society 1630–1790’, Past and Present, XXIX (1968), 62–80Google Scholar; Gross, Robert A., The Minutemen and their world (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; and Jones, Douglas Lamar, ‘The strolling poor: transiency in eighteenth-century Massachusetts’, Journal of Social History, vIII, 3 (1975), 28–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The concept of ‘Europeanization’ belongs to Lockridge.

7 The urban crucible: social change, political consciousness, and the origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979)Google Scholar. See also Smith, Billy G., ‘The material lives of laboring Philadelphians, 1750 to 1800’, WMQ, 3rd ser. xxxvm, 2 (1981), 163–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.