Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:09:22.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politics of Conquest: the British in Western Kenya, 1894–19081

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. M. Lonsdale
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge

Extract

This is a study of a colonial situation in its making, at ground level. It offers an analysis of a forcible process of political accumulation, the means whereby their British conquerors came to terms with the peoples of western Kenya, and a prerequisite for the pursuit of capital accumulation, the appropriation of economic resources from the native peoples of Kenya to the benefit of its British colonists. The case of western Kenya offers no paradigm for the European occupation of the rest of the African continent. Nor can any other case. The relative weights of subjugation and accommodation, of rupture and continuity within conquest – of such great influence on the structure and texture of the colonial era which followed – were governed by too many variables. Brief mention of only four of them will be enough to indicate some of the pitfalls of generalization, even generalization about difference.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Until 1902, the area under study was administered as part of the Eastern Province of Uganda being transferred in that year, along with much other territory, to the East Africa Protectorate, which was to become the Colony of Kenya in 1920.

3 It is intended to explore these further in the concluding chapter of the Cambridge history of Africa, Vol. 6: 1870–1905.

4 As implied in Saul, John S., ‘The State in post-colonial societies: Tanzania’, in Miliband, R. and Savile, J., Socialist Register, 1974 (London, 1974), p. 353.Google Scholar

5 As observed by Wallerstein, , in Gutkind, P. C. W. and Wallerstein, I. (eds), The political economy of contemporary Africa (Beverley Hills and London, 1976), pp. 43f.Google Scholar

6 Hyam, Ronald, The failure of South African expansion, 1908–1948 (London, 1972), pp. 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Mungeam, G. H., British rule in Kenya, 1895–1912 (Oxford, 1966), pp. 171180: G. Northcote to his father, 12 Feb. 1908: Kenya National Archives [K.N.A.], DC/KSI.4/1.Google Scholar

8 Commissioner of Public Works to Ross, W. McGregor, 29 Jan. 1908: Ross papers, privately held.Google Scholar

9 For an important study of such a development in West Africa, see Wilks, Ivor, Nineteenth-century Asante (London, 1976).Google Scholar

10 For a recent, revisionist account, see Low, D. A., ‘Warbands and ground-level im-perialism in Uganda, 1870–1900’, Historial Studies, no. 65 (Melbourne, Oct. 1975), pp. 584–97.Google Scholar

11 General outline histories of the main Nyanza peoples are to be found in Ogot, B. A., History of the Southern Luo, 1 (Nairobi, 1967)Google Scholar; Were, G. S., A history of the Abaluyia, c. 1500–1930 (Nairobi, 1967)Google Scholar; Ochieng, W. R.', A pre-colonial history of the Gusii of Western Kenya (Nairobi, 1974).Google Scholar The problem of cultural flexibility is discussed further in, for example, Sutton, J. E. G., ‘Some reflections on the early history of Western Kenya’, Hadith 2 (Nairobi, 1970), pp. 1729Google Scholar; Were, G. S., ‘Ethnic interaction in Western Kenya: the emergence of the Abaluyia up to 1850’, Kenya Hist. Rev. 2, 1 (1974), pp. 3944Google Scholar, Hay, M. J., ‘Local trade and ethnicity in Western Kenya’, African Econ. Hist. Rev., 11, 1 (Madison, 1975), pp. 712Google Scholar; Lonsdale, J. M., ‘When did the Gusii (or anybody else) become a tribe?’, forthcoming in Kenya Hist. Rev., 1977.Google Scholar

12 For these various peoples, see Dealing, James, ‘Politics in Wanga, Kenya, c. 1650–1914’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University, 1974)Google Scholar; de Wolf, J. J., ‘Religious inno- vation and social change among die Bukusu’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1971)Google Scholar; Waller, Richard, ‘The Maasai and the British 1895–1905: the origins of an alliance’, Jl. African Hist, XVII, 4 (1976), pp. 529–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 The British conquest of the Nandi is the subject of a definitive, continuing study by Matson, A. T.. His Nandi resistance to British rule, 1 (Nairobi, 1972), covers the period to 1899.Google Scholar

14 Jackson, F. J. to Hobley, C. W., 2 Feb. 1895:EntebbeSecretariatArchives[E.S.A.],A.5/1.Google Scholar

15 For changes within ‘traditional religion’ in order to explain social changes see Horton, R., ‘African Conversion’, Africa, XLI, 2 (1971), pp. 85107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For the prophets of western Kenya: Wagner, G., The Bantu of North Kavirondo, 1 (Oxford, 1949), p. 212Google Scholar; Ogot, B. A., ‘British administration in the Central Nyanza District of Kenya, 1900–1960 Jl. African Hist, IV, 2 (1963), p. 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ochieng, W. R.', ‘The Biography of Yona Omolo’, in King, K. and Salim, A. (eds), Kenya historical biographies (Nairobi, 1971), p. 80Google Scholar; idem, Black Jeremiah’, Jl. Historical Association of Kenya, I, 1 (1972), pp. 621.Google Scholar

16 Compare Low, D. A., in History of East Africa, 11, eds. Harlow, V. and Chilver, E. M. (Oxford, 1965), pp. 11f.Google Scholar

17 Partridge, P. H., ‘Some notes on the concept of power’, Political Studies, XI, 2 (1963), pp. 107–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baldwin, D. A., ‘Money and power’, Jl. of Politics, 33 (1971), pp. 578614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 See the oral records in typescript evidence to Committee on Land Tenure in North Kavirondo (1930), p. 80: copy in Archdeacon W. E. Owen's papers, Church Missionary Society Archives, London; ‘History of the Bukusu’, Elgon Nyanza District Ethnological Records: K.N.A., DC/EN. 3/2/4; Were, G. S., Western Kenya historical texts (Nairobi, 1967), pp. 37f., 43, 65, 119, 131f.Google Scholar; Dealing, , op cit. pp. 313f., 319–22Google Scholar; Hay, M. J., ‘Economic change in Luoland: Kowe, 1890–1945’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1972), p. 81.Google Scholar

19 On the importance of unintended results and misleading appearances in power relations, see Partridge, P. H., art. cit.; G. T. Prins, ‘Lewanika's achievement reconsidered: Europeans and Bulozi, 1878–1916’, Cambridge University Commonwealth and Overseas History Seminar Paper, 1976.Google Scholar The classic exposition of collaboration theory has litde to say on this aspect. See Robinson, Ronald, ‘Non-European foundations of European Imperialisms: sketch for a theory of collaboration’, in Studies in the theory of imperialism, eds. Owen, R. and Sutcliffe, R. B. (London, 1972), pp. 117–40.Google Scholar

20 See Table of British Operations, columns 3 and 4. Further examples of peaceful arbitration or support for African judicial decisions are recorded in Hobley's personal diary, 8 Jan. 1896, 8 and 15 May 1896, 8 Nov. 1896, 8 Jan. 1897. Deposited in Rhodes House Library, Oxford.

21 E.g. Southall, A. W., Alur society (Cambridge, n.d.,? 1955)Google Scholar, especially chapter VIII; Horton, Robin, ‘Stateless societies in the history of West Africa’, in History of West Africa, 1, eds. Ajayi, J. F. A. and Crowder, M. (London, 1971), pp. 106–19.Google Scholar

22 E.g. North Kavirondo [sc. Nyanza] Central Association, petition to House of Commons 13 June 1936: K.N.A., PC/NZA. a/655; see also Low, D. A., in History of East Africa, 11, pp. 31–4.Google Scholar

23 Hobley, C. W. to Commissioner, H.M., 15 Feb. 1896: E.S.A.,A.4/4; same to same, 3 Aug. 1898 (A.4/12); and 26 Apr. 1900 (A.4/28).Google Scholar

24 Ogot, B. A., ‘Revolt of the elders’, in Hadith 4: Politics and nationalism in colonial Kenya, ed. Ogot, B. A. (Nairobi, 1972), pp. 134–49.Google Scholar

25 E.g., Spire, F. to Col. Colvile, H., 15 Sept. 1894: E.S.A., A.2/2.Google Scholar

26 The diaries of Lord Lugard, eds. Perham, M. and Bull, M. (London, 1969), 1, 402.Google Scholar

27 diary, Hobley, 24 Aug. 1896Google Scholar, 21, 22 and 26 Dec. 1896; Hobley to Sir Harry Johnston, 26 Apr. 1900: E.S.A., A.4/28; Dealing, , op. cit. pp. 330f., 336.Google Scholar

28 Hobley, to Berkeley, , 12 Nov. 1895: E.S.A., A.4/3; Spire toColvile, 11 Nov. 1894: A.2/3; Evidence to committee on land tenure in North Kavirondo, p. 80 (evidence of Revd. Alfayo Odongo).Google Scholar

29 Dealing, , op. cit. p. 346.Google Scholar

30 Matson, , Nandi resistance to British rule, passimGoogle Scholar; Ng'eny, S. K. arap, ‘Nandi resistance to the establishment of British administration 1883–1906’, in Hadith 2, ed. Ogot, B. A. (Nairobi, 1970), pp. 104–26.Google Scholar

31 Apter, D., The politics of modernization (Chicago, 1965), p. 40.Google Scholar

32 The bulk of the relevant material is in the two Entebbe Secretariat series A.2: ‘Staff and Miscellaneous, Inward’, and A.4: ‘Staff Correspondence, Inward’.

33 My thanks to John Iliffe for alerting me to these problems.

34 Grant, W. to Jackson, , 16 Jan. 1895: E.S.A., A.4/1; Hobley's report, n.d., enclosure in Johnston to Lord Salisbury, 5 Feb. 1900: P.R.O., F.O. 2/297.Google Scholar

35 For a classic example, see Brown, Richard, ‘The external relations of the Ndebele kingdom in the preparation era’, in African societies in Southern Africa, ed. Thompson, L. (London, 1969), pp. 259–81.Google Scholar

36 Stokes, Compare Eric, ‘Traditional resistance movements and Afro-Asian nationalism’, Past and Present, 48 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37 Compare Hopkins, A. G., An economic history of West Africa (London, 1973), chapter 2.Google Scholar

38 For which see Matson, , Nandi resistance, passim.Google Scholar

39 Hay, , op. cit. chapter 4.Google Scholar

40 Hobley, to Berkeley, , 17 Oct. 1895Google Scholar: E.S.A., A.4/3; Matson, , Nandi resistance, I, 117, 328, 360Google Scholar; McAllister, R. D. to Berkeley, , 12 Sept. 1898: A.4/13Google Scholar; Hobley, to Berkeley, , 14 Jul. 1898: A.4/11Google Scholar; Austin, H. H., With Macdonald in Uganda (London, 1903), p. 253.Google Scholar

41 Hobley, to Berkeley, , 21 Dec. 1898: E.S.A. A.4/14.Google Scholar

42 Johnston to Capt. Gorges, 10 Feb. 1900: E.S.A., A.5/9; Manners, R. A., ‘The Kipsigis of Kenya’, in Contemporary change in traditional societies, ed. Steward, J. H. (Chicago, 1967), 1, 219f., 248–51Google Scholar; Lang'at, S. C., ‘Some Aspects of Kipsigis History before 1914’, in Ngano, ed. Mcintosh, B. G. (Nairobi, 1969), pp. 8892.Google Scholar

43 Correspondence between Ainsworth, J., Spire and Jackson, 1911 to 1913: E.S.A., Secretariat Minute Paper 3022.Google Scholar

44 Hobley, to Berkeley, , 4 Feb. 1896: E.S.A., A.4/4.Google Scholar

45 Grant, to Jackson, , 16 Jan. 1895Google Scholar: E.S.A., A.4/1; Hobley to Berkeley, 13 Sept. 1895, A.4/2; Hobley, diary, 1–24 Aug. 1895; Dealing, , op. cit. p. 233.Google Scholar

46 Hobley, diary, 1 and 12 Sept. 1896; idem, Report, enclosure in Johnston, to Salisbury, , 5 Feb. 1900Google Scholar: P.R.O., F.O., 2/297; Johnston, to Hobley, , 4 Jan. 1900: E.S.A., A.5/9.Google Scholar

47 The overall position, as demonstrated during die 1897 mutiny of Sudanese troops and the Ogaden (Somali) expedition of 1900–1, rested on the men of the sub-continental Indian barracks. See Robinson, R. and Gallagher, J., with Denny, A., Africa and the Victorians (London, 1961).Google Scholar

48 Hobley, to Johnston, , 7 Mar. 1900: E.S.A., A.4/26Google Scholar; Matson, , Nandi resistance, 11, chapter 2. I am indebted to Mr Matson for a sight of the MS.Google Scholar

49 A. H., Clayton, Le Q., ‘Labour in the East Africa Protectorate, 1895–1918’ (University of St Andrews Ph.D. thesis, 1971), p. 350.Google Scholar

50 To borrow and adapt a phrase from Frykenberg, R. E., Guntur District 1788–1848: a history of local influence and central authority in South India (Oxford, 1965), p. 11.Google Scholar

51 Low, D. A., Lion rampant (London, 1973), pp. 30–3.Google Scholar

52 Lugard diaries, I, loc. cit.

53 Spire, to Colvile, , 11 Nov. 1894; E.S.A., A. 2/3; Hobley, diary, 8 Mar. 1895; it is uncertain for how long Hobley maintained their exclusion.Google Scholar

54 Ascendancy needed very much the same sort of reinforcement over the Luo in 1899, with the Uyoma-Sakwa-Seme expedition.

55 Compare Cairns, H. A. C., Prelude to imperialism: British reactions to Central African society, 1840–1890 (London, 1965), p. 70.Google Scholar

56 diary, Hobley, 8 and 15 Apr. 1896; and somewhat irregularly thereafter.Google Scholar

57 Compare Worsley, Peter, The Third World (London, 2nd edn, 1967), p. 320.Google Scholar The man in question was Kivini (Chibini) of the Isukha Mironge clan. Oral tradition remembers him as a weak man of no significance; Itebete, Peter, ‘Primary resistance among the Idakho of western Kenya’ (University of Dar es Salaam, undergraduate research paper, 1965).Google Scholar

58 Matson, , Nandi resistance, 1, 294. ‘Bombay African’ was the term applied to Africans freed by the Royal Navy's anti–slave squadron in the Indian Ocean and subsequently educated by the Church Missionary Society in India.Google Scholar

59 Hobley, to Berkeley, , 21 Dec. 1898: E.S.A., A.4/14.Google Scholar

60 Archer, G. F., Report on the work carried out by the Kitosh [Bukusu] Patrol between July 28th and September 1st 1908Google Scholar, enclosure in Jackson, to Crewe, , 20 Oct. 1908: P.R.O., C.O. 533/47/513.Google Scholar

61 This conclusion requires more space than can be provided here. It is intended to substantiate it in a larger work on Nyanza now in progress.