Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:32:50.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Sectional Issues in American Politics, 1830–1875

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Bruce Collins
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hartz, Louis, The Liberal tradition in America (New York, 1955), pp. 139–42.Google Scholar

2 Parties are hardly mentioned at all in important chapters of Hartz, Louis, Economic policy and Democratic thought: Pennsylvania, 1776–1860 (Chicago, 1968 edn)Google Scholar, chs. v, vii, and of Oscar and Handlin, Mary Flug, Commonwealth. A study of the role of government in the American economy. Massachusetts, 1774–1861 (Cambridge, Mass., 1969, revd. edn), chs. 9, 10.Google Scholar

3 For a theory of generational conflict, see Huntington, Samuel P., ‘Paradigms of American politics: beyond the one, the two, and the many’, Political Science Quarterly, 89 (1974), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Pessen, Edward, Jacksonian America: society, personality and politics (Homewood, Ill., 1969)Google Scholar, Riches, class and power before the Civil War (Lexington, Mass., 1973).Google Scholar

5 For an excellent introduction to this problem, see Ratcliffe, Donald J., ‘The role of voters and issues in party formation: Ohio, 1824’, Journal of American History, LIX (1973), 847–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘The experience of Revolution and the beginnings of party politics in Ohio, 1776–1816’, Ohio History 85 (1976), 186230, esp. 219–30.Google ScholarPhillips, Kim T., ‘The Pennsylvania origins of the Jackson movement’, Political Science Quarterly, xci (1976), 489508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Johannsen, , Stephen A. Douglas, p. 27.Google Scholar

7 Dangerfield, George, The era of good feelings (London, 1953), pp. 175–83.Google Scholar For a variety of expressions of party feeling, see (Washington, D.C.) National Intelligencer 17, 19, 21 02, 7 04 1818.Google Scholar For congressional discussion of a federal bankruptcy law and federal aid for internal improvements, ibid. 19, 21 Feb., 19 March, 4 Apr. 1818, and for discussions of foreign policy, see ibid., 17, 31 March 1818.

8 This observation was made, in a different context, by Pole, J. R., ‘The creation of the American Republic’, Historical Journal, XIII (1970), 802.Google Scholar

9 National Intelligencer, 3, 17, 21 02, 5 03, 1818.Google Scholar

10 McFaul, John M., The politics of Jacksonian finance (Ithaca, 1972), pp. 72–8, 210–16.Google ScholarSharp, James Roger, The Jacksonians versus the banks (New York, 1970).Google Scholar

11 He lacked the local ties which Seward enjoyed and which are discussed in Brogan, Hugh, ‘Lincoln's comforter’, Historical Journal, xiv (1971), 645–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 On this and on the gross misrepresentations made by Republican newspapers in reporting events in Kansas in 1855–6, see Potter, David M. (completed and ed. by Fehrenbacher, Don E.), The impending crisis 1848–1861 (New York, 1976), pp. 162–5, 217–24.Google Scholar

13 Stevenson, J. W. to Stevenson, J. B., 30 11 1858.Google Scholar Thomas B. Stevenson papers, Cincinnati Historical Society.

14 May, Robert E., The southern dream ofa Caribbean empire, 1854–1861 (Baton Rouge, 1973), pp. 3676, esp. pp. 3740, 5761.Google Scholar

15 The letters of Stephen A. Douglas, ed. Johannsen, Robert W. (Urbana, 1961), pp. 331, 333–4, 342–3.Google Scholar

16 See also, Sweeney, Kevin, ‘Rum, Romanism, representation, and reform: coalition politics in Massachusetts, 1847–1853’, Civil War History, xxii (1976), 116–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Woodward, C. Vann, The burden of southern history (New York, Vintage Books edn, n.d.), pp. 62–5.Google Scholar

18 Ershkowitz, Herbert and Shade, William G., ‘Consensus or conflict? Political behavior in the state legislatures during the Jacksonian era’, Journal of American History, LVIII (1971), 591621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Formisano, Ronald P., The birth of mass political parties. Michigan, 1827–1861 (Princeton, 1971), ch. xi.Google Scholar

20 See also Holt, Michael F., ‘The politics of impatience: the origins of Know Nothingism’, Journal of American History, LX (1973), 309–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21 Baker, Jean H., The politics of continuity. Maryland political parties from 1858 to 1870 (Baltimore, 1973), p. 211.Google Scholar

22 Richardson, James F., ‘To control the city’, in Jackson, Kenneth T. and Schultz, Stanley K. (eds.), Cities in American history (New York, 1972), pp. 276–7.Google Scholar