Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:43:37.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NARRATIVES OF DECLINE IN THE DUTCH NATIONAL SOCIALIST MOVEMENT, 1931–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

CELESTINE S. KUNKELER
CELESTINE S. KUNKELER*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
Trinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, cb2 1tq[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Generic fascism scholarship, which has turned strongly towards cultural political history in recent years, has focused heavily on themes of rebirth in fascist culture, but rebirth's counterpart of decline remains under-researched. After emphasizing the existence of several distinct and even mutually exclusive ideological strands in the NSB, this article shows how ideological difference was marked by narratives of decline. But they were equally used to generate a coherent political message about the contemporary state of the Netherlands. Central to their functionality as a unifying tool was party newspaper Volk en Vaderland, which served to promote a patriotic, news-focused, and peculiarly Dutch narrative of decline that overarched ideological difference. Yet more than just tying ends together, one narrative in particular served as a crucial ideological constant in the Movement, namely the Leider Anton Mussert's narrative of decline since the early modern Golden Age of the Dutch Republic, which tied traditional liberal patriotic themes into fascist discourse. Where other historians have emphasized Mussert's lack of moral and ideological leadership, the article impresses how narratives of decline functioned as moral support, and rallied NSB loyalists throughout the German occupation of the Netherlands, until Mussert's own death.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 205 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Article updated on 18 November 2024.

Thanks to John Pollard, Pedro Ramos Pinto, and Henning Grunwald for reading through early versions of this article, and providing suggestions for improvement.

References

1 Volk en Vaderland (VoVa), 9:1, 2 Jan. 1942, p. 4. All translations are my own, unless otherwise stated.

2 Ibid.

3 Zaal, Wim, De Nederlandse fascisten (Amsterdam, 2016), pp. 80–1Google Scholar; te Slaa, Robin and Klijn, Edwin, De NSB: Ontstaan en opkomst van de Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging, 1931–1935 (Amsterdam, 2010), p. 200Google Scholar.

4 de Jonge, A. A., Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland: voorgeschiedenis, ontstaan en ontwikkeling (2nd edn, The Hague, 1979), pp. 100–1Google Scholar.

5 Teich, Mikuláš and Porter, Roy, eds., Fin de siècle and its legacy (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 1–9Google Scholar.

6 Overy, Richard, The morbid age: Britain and the crisis of civilization, 1919–1939 (London, 2010), pp. 1–5Google Scholar.

7 Huizinga, Johan, In de schaduwen van morgen: een diagnose van het geestelijk lijden van onzen tijd (6th edn, Haarlem, 1936), p. 118Google Scholar; see also Wesseling, H. L., ‘From cultural historian to cultural critic: Johan Huizinga and the spirit of the 1930s’, European Review, 10 (2002), pp. 485–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 de Jonge, A. A., Crisis en critiek der democratie: anti-democratische stromingen en de daarin levende denkbeelden over de dtaat in Nederland tussen de wereldoorlogen (Utrecht, 1982)Google Scholar.

9 Griffin, Roger, ‘The primacy of culture: the current growth (or manufacture) of consensus within fascist studies’, Journal of Contemporary History, 37 (2002), pp. 21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, ‘Palingenetischer Ultranationalismus: Die Geburtswehen einer neuen Faschismusdeutung’, in Schlemmer, Thomas and Woller, Hans, eds, Der Faschismus in Europa: Wege der Forschung (Munich, 2014), pp. 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Griffin, Roger, The nature of fascism (London, 1993), pp. 32–9Google Scholar.

11 Idem, Modernism and fascism: the sense of a beginning under Mussolini and Hitler (Basingstoke, 2007)Google Scholar; Bauerkämper, Arnd, Der Faschismus in Europa, 1918–1945 (Stuttgart, 2006), p. 29Google Scholar; Herman, Arthur, The idea of decline in Western history (London, 1997), p. 102Google Scholar.

12 Paxton, Robert O., The anatomy of fascism (London, 2005), pp. 218–20Google Scholar.

13 Kallis, Artistotle, ‘Fascism, “licence” and genocide: from the chimera of rebirth to the authorization of mass murder’, in Pinto, António Costa, ed., Rethinking the nature of fascism: comparative perspectives (London, 2011), pp. 227–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Griffin, Roger, ed., Fascism (Oxford, 1995), p. 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Havenaar, Ronald, De NSB tussen nationalisme en ‘volkse’ solidariteit: de vooroorlogse ideologie van de Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging in Nederland (’s-Gravenhage, 1983), pp. 131–2Google Scholar.

16 Ch. ‘Mussert als waterstaatsingenieur, 1920–1934’, in Pollmann, Tessell, Mussert & Co.: de NSB-Leider en zijn vertrouwelingen (Amsterdam, 2012), pp. 28–50Google Scholar.

17 Havenaar, Ronald, Anton Adriaan Mussert: Verrader voor het vaderland (The Hague, 1984), pp. 19–21Google Scholar; for a comprehensive history of the treaty, with a summary in English, see Schuursma, R. L., Het onaannemelijk tractaat: het verdrag met België van 3 April 1925 in de Nederlandse publieke opinie (Groningen, 1975)Google Scholar.

18 Meyers, Jan, Mussert: een politiek leven (Amsterdam, 1984), p. 38Google Scholar.

19 Ch. ‘Mussert en Kees van Geelkerken’, in Pollmann, Mussert & Co., pp. 110–17.

20 Vossen, Koen, Vrij vissen in het Vondelpark: kleine politieke partijen in Nederland, 1918–1940 (Amsterdam, 2003), pp. 166–7Google Scholar; Slaa and Klijn, De NSB, p. 123.

21 Speech, Mussert, 9 Oct. 1937, Lunteren, p. 9, Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD), Amsterdam, Archive 123 (NSB)/1.1: inventory no. 71; see also van Geelkerken, Cornelis, ed., Voor Volk en Vaderland: de strijd der Nationaal Socialistische Beweging, 1931 – 14 December – 1941 (2nd edn, Utrecht, 1943), p. 507Google Scholar.

22 Jonge, Crisis en critiek der democratie, p. 221.

23 Gerard J. P. J. Bolland (1854–1922) was an influential philosopher at the University of Leiden, and instigated a Hegelian revival in Dutch academia. In the 1920s, Bolland gained avid devotees among Dutch fascist groups for his virulently anti-democratic and anti-semitic opinions, perhaps best summarized in his 1921 lecture, ‘The signs of the times’. Jonge, Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland, pp. 21–2; see also, republished in 1940, Bolland, G. J. P. J., De teekenen des tijds (2nd edn, Amsterdam, 1940)Google Scholar.

24 VoVa, 1:22, 3 June 1933, p. 3.

25 ‘Fascistische Studies, II.’, VoVa, 1:21, 27 May 1933, p. 2.

26 Ibid.

27 Letter, H. J. van Houten to F. E. Farwerck, Arnhem, 18 July 1933, p. 3, NIOD, 123/2.01: 397.

28 Jonge, Crisis en critiek der democratie, pp. 253–6.

29 van Genechten, Robert, Een jong Nederland in een jong Europa (Rotterdam, 1941), p. 6Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., p. 4.

31 van Genechten, Robert, De strijd tusschen nat.-socialisme en fascisme eenerzijds en kapitalisme en bolsjewisme anderzijds (NSB, Afdeeling Vorming, 1941), pp. 2–3Google Scholar.

32 Introduction to Fraenkel-Verkade, E., van der Leeuw, A. J., and Barnouw, David, eds., Correspondentie van M. M. Rost van Tonningen (2 vols., ’s-Gravenhage, 1967), i, pp. 37–40Google Scholar.

33 ‘Het marxisme is wegbereider voor Joodsche overheersing’, VoVa, 5:11, 12 Mar. 1937, p. 2.

34 See for instance VoVa, 6:46, 18 Nov. 1938, p. 1.

35 Speech MS, Kemp, Lunteren, 18 Aug. 1938, pp. 1–2, NIOD, 123/1.1:87.

36 Ibid.

37 Jonge, Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland, p. 4; van den Toorn, Maarten Cornelis, Wij melden U den nieuwen tijd: een beschouwing van het woordgebruik van de Nederlandse nationaal-socialisten (’s-Gravenhage, 1991), p. 4Google Scholar.

38 Pollmann, Mussert & Co., p. 67; Slaa and Klijn, De NSB, pp. 183, 521.

39 Instructions for colportage, Head of Colportage, Haarlem, 27 Aug. 1941, p. 1, NIOD, 123/2.01:531.

40 Report meeting of Leider with district leader and heads, Utrecht, 20 Mar. 1944, p. 14, NIOD, 123/1.2: 231.

41 Ibid., meeting minutes, 20 June 1944, Utrecht, pp. 29–30.

42 Circular, ‘Onderwerp voor de komende week’, 11 Jan. 1936, NIOD, 123/2.01:527.

43 Ibid., 7 Mar. 1936.

44 ‘Rede van Mussert op den Landdag’, VoVa, 1:2. 14 Jan. 1933, p. 1.

45 ‘De Lijdensweg der Boeren’, VoVa, 1:32, 12 Aug. 1933, p. 2.

46 The Great Depression in the Netherlands was delayed but particularly severe, with 100,000 unemployed by 1931, and over 400,000 by 1933, figures which remained more or less static until 1939. Jonge, Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland, p. 40.

47 Ibid. See also VoVa, 2:20, pp. 1, 4, 2:44, p. 1, and 3:30, pp. 2–3.

48 VoVa, 3:10, 9 Mar. 1935, pp. 3, 6, 7.

49 Wielenga, Friso, A history of the Netherlands: from the sixteenth century to the present day (London, 2015), p. 174Google Scholar; for an analysis of the formation of the pillars in the nineteenth century, see Blom, J. C. H. and Talsma, J., eds., De verzuiling voorbij: godsdienst, stand en natie in de lange Negentiende eeuw (Amsterdam, 2000)Google Scholar.

50 Adema, Janneke, ‘Verzuiling als metafoor voor modernisering’, in de Keizer, Madelon and Tates, Sophie, eds., Moderniteit: modernisme en massacultuur in Nederland, 1914–1940 (Zutphen, 2004), pp. 265–6Google Scholar.

51 Aerts, Remieg et al. , Land van kleine gebaren: een politieke geschiedenis van Nederland, 1780–1990 (Nijmegen, 1999), pp. 200–1Google Scholar.

52 Hansen, Erik, ‘Fascism and nazism in the Netherlands, 1929–1939’, European Studies Review, 3 (1981), pp. 355–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 ‘Eenheid Temidden van Verdeeldheid’, VoVa, 1:6, 11 Feb. 1933, p. 3.

54 Illustration, VoVa, 13:13, 6 Apr. 1945, p. 2.

55 Rather naively, Mussert appealed to Mussolini to use his influence at the Vatican to put an end to the censure of the Dutch episcopacy. Letter, Mussert to Mussolini, 23 Apr. 1937, Utrecht, NIOD, 123/1.1:61.

56 ‘Barmat’, VoVa, 5:47, 19 Nov. 1937, p. 2.

57 Max Marchant et d'Ansembourg was a Catholic aristocrat, and mayor of the town of Amstenrade in the Catholic south, until he gave up his position to join the NSB. D'Ansembourg's lineage and position lent the NSB a great deal of prestige and respectability, but antagonized the episcopacy. See for instance the 1935 correspondence between d'Ansembourg and the bishop of Roermond in NSB Gewest iii: 2.19.049, dossier 10, The Hague National Archive.

58 ‘Barmat’, VoVa, 5:47, 19 Nov. 1937, p. 5.

59 Wat was en is, wat deed en doet, de NSB? (Utrecht, 1941), p. 8Google Scholar.

60 Speech MS, Anton Mussert, 7 Sept. 1932, Utrecht, p. 5, NIOD, 123/1.1:7.

61 Brochure, programme for the 4th Landdag, 5 Oct. 1935, NIOD, 123/1.1:37.

62 Song booklet, De WA zingt, 13. ‘De Geuzenvendels Rukken Aan’. NIOD, 123/2.14:1127.

63 A. J. van Vessem, ‘Stadhouder Prins Willem II: zijn beteekenis voor onzen tijd’, VoVa, 3:20, 18 May 1935, p. 6.

64 Ibid., p. 7.

65 Het proces Mussert (Amsterdam, 1987), p. 214.

66 Ibid., p. 112.

67 Letter, Mussert to D., Scheveningen, 14 Dec. 1945, in Mussert, A., Nagelaten Bekentenissen: verantwoording en celbrieven van de NSB-leider, ed. Groeneveld, Gerard (Nijmegen, 2005), p. 206Google Scholar.

68 Mussert, Nagelaten Bekentenissen, p. 62.

69 ‘Vlaanderen en Holland’, VoVa, 1:1, 7 Jan. 1933, p. 2.

70 Ibid.

71 Philip II of Spain and Charles V were examples of such political Catholicism. See VoVa, 7:34, 25 Aug. 1939, p. 8.

72 Mussert, preface to brochure by van Vlekke, June 1939, p. 5, NIOD, 123/1.1:98.

73 Although in a letter to Arthur Seyss-Inquart in 1941, Mussert still spoke of the struggle against the democratic forces allied with England and France. Letter, Mussert to Seyss-Inquart, Utrecht, 18 June 1941, NIOD, 123/1.1 113. The Netherlands has been in decline in relation to England ever since the Spanish War of Succession, VoVa complained. VoVa, 12:35, 28 Aug. 1942, p. 1.

74 Speech MS, Mussert, 1 May 1941, pp. 1–5, NIOD, 123/1.1:134.

75 Ibid., p. 5.

76 Ibid.; speech MS, Mussert, The Hague et al., 20 June–30 Aug. 1941, p. 2.

77 Speech MS, Mussert, ‘Ons Volksch Ontwaken’, 7 Apr. 1945, Pulchri Studio, The Hague, p. 7, NIOD, 123/1.1:256. The speech was also published in a propaganda booklet by Mussert, Nenasu. A., Grondslag der herrijzenis: ons volksch ontwaken (Utrecht, 1945)Google Scholar.

78 Verhagen, Frans, Toen de katholieken Nederland veroverden: Charles Ruijs de Beerenbrouck, 1873–1936 (Amsterdam, 2015), pp. 32–3Google Scholar.

79 E.g. on the Royal Palace in Amsterdam, ‘The National Socialist Movement…demands respect for the national monument. Come join our struggle’, ‘Nationaal Monument’, VoVa, 1:6, 11 Feb. 1933, p. 2.

80 Letter, Mussert to Seyss-Inquart, Almelo, 8 Mar. 1945, NIOD, 123/1.1:113. It is unclear whether Mussert's letter played any role whatsoever in the survival of the gasthuistoren.

81 Het proces Mussert, p. 217; Mussert also mentioned the episode in his vindicatory history of the NSB, see ch. ‘De NSB in Oorlogstijd’, in Mussert, Nagelaten Bekentenissen, p. 141.

82 de Haas, Jan, Dit moet gij weten over de Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging der Nederlanden (Amsterdam, 1943), p. 37Google Scholar.

83 Especially in light of semi-private remarks he made about another NSB publication, Het Nationale Dagblad: ‘I am never sure whether today or tomorrow something won't appear in Het Nationale Dagblad. Every day there is a new surprise.’ Report meeting of the Leider with circle leaders and heads, Utrecht, 20 Mar. 1944, p. 13, NIOD, 123/1.1:231.

84 Jonge, Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland, p. 77.

85 Rees, Philip, Biographical dictionary of the extreme right since 1890 (New York, NY, 1990), p. 274Google Scholar.

86 Kwiet, Konrad, Reichskommissariat Niederlande: Versuch und Scheitern nationalsozialistischer Neuordnung (Stuttgart, 1968), pp. 40–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 ten Have, Wichert, De Nederlandse Unie: aanpassing, vernieuwing en confrontatie in bezettingstijd, 1940–1941 (Amsterdam, 1999), pp. 41Google Scholar, 159.

88 Kwiet, Reichskommissariat Niederlande, p. 48.

89 Hirschfeld, Gerhard, Nazi rule and Dutch collaboration: the Netherlands under German occupation, 1940–1945 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 20–1Google Scholar.

90 Payne, Stanley G., A history of fascism, 1914–1945 (Madison, WI, 1995), p. 50Google Scholar.

91 Kwiet, Reichskommissariat Niederlande, p. 81.

92 Loock, Hans-Dietrich, ‘Zur “grossgermanischen Politik” des dritten Reiches’, Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 8 (1960), pp. 37–63Google Scholar.

93 Kwiet, Reichskommissariat Niederlande, p. 51.

94 VoVa, 8:19, 10 May 1940, p. 7; ‘Van Oud naar Nieuw: Nederland op den Drempel van den Nieuwen Tijd’, VoVa, 8:20, 24 May 1940, p. 1.

95 Anton Mussert, VoVa, 8:20, 24 May 1940, p. 1.

96 Ibid., p. 4.

97 Ibid., p. 5.

98 Ibid., p. 7.

99 VoVa, 8:21, 31 May 1940, p. 2.

100 de Jong, Gerie, Kok, René, and Somers, Erik, Naar eer en geweten: gewone Nederlanders in een ongewone tijd, 1940–1945 (Zwolle, 2001), p. 47Google Scholar.

101 ‘Why all this talk of a new time and a new order?’, asked one headline in De Unie, 1:32, 28 Mar. 1941, p. 1.

102 E.g. Standaard, 69: 20 949, 1 Oct. 1940, p. 8.

103 Romijn, Peter, Burgemeesters in oorlogstijd: besturen tijdens de Duitse bezetting (Amsterdam, 2006), pp. 17–19Google Scholar, 668.

104 Letter, Marchant d'Ansembourgh to F. Schmidt (copy for Mussert), 26 Nov. 1940, NIOD, 123/1.1:114.

105 Hirschfeld, Nazi rule and Dutch collaboration, p. 43.

106 Jonge, Het nationaal-socialisme in Nederland, p. 174.

107 Proposal, State Secretariat: Bureau of Indian Affairs, ‘The German press and the Dutch Indies’, 15 Jan. 1944, NIOD, 123/2.13:913.

108 In ’t Veld, N. K. C. A., ed., De SS en Nederland: documenten uit SS-archieven, 1935–1945 (2 vols., ’s-Gravenhage, 1976), i, pp. 479–83Google Scholar.

109 E.g. Storm SS, 5:1, 6 Apr. 1945, p. 2.

110 ‘“De Nederlander” en “De Duitser”…’, Hamer, 1:1, Oct. 1940, p. 2.

111 Ibid., p. 9.

112 Ibid., p. 19.

113 Storm SS, 1:1, 11 Apr. 1941, p. 1.

114 Ibid.

115 Roskam, E. J., De stem van ons bloed (Leiden, 1940), p. 17Google Scholar.

116 Toorn, Wij melden U den nieuwen tijd, p. 7.

117 VoVa, 12:22, 2 June 1944, p. 5.

118 Speech by A. A. Mussert, in Veld, ed., De SS en Nederland, i, no. 410, p. 1079.

119 Ibid., ii, pp. 1080–3.

120 Ibid., i, p. 1062.

121 ‘Het Oordeel der Geschiedenis’, VoVa, 10:18, 7 May 1943, p. 1.

122 Ibid.

123 Storm SS, 3:6, 14 May 1943, p. 1.

124 Veld, ed., De SS en Nederland, ii, p. 1016.

125 Rauter to Himmler, The Hague, 13 Jan. 1944, in Veld, ed., De SS en Nederland, ii, no. 498, p. 1278; Jong, Kok, and Somers, Naar eer en geweten, pp. 57–9.

126 Letter, [name restricted] to Mussert, 5 Jan. 1945, NIOD, 123/1.1:260.

127 Ibid., letter, Mussert to [name restricted], 15 Jan. 1945, Almelo.

128 Ibid., letter, Mussert to [name restricted], 17 Jan. 1945, Almelo.

129 ‘History has led our people to a new low. It will be our task to get it out of there’, VoVa, 12:43, 27 Oct. 1944, p. 2.

130 Speech MS, Mussert to district and circle leaders, 26 Feb. 1944, p. 1, NIOD, 123/1.1:231.

131 Speech, Mussert, ‘Ons Volksch Ontwaken’, 7 Apr. 1945, Pulchri Studio, The Hague, p. 1, NIOD, 123/1.1.256.

132 Ibid., p. 17.

133 Ibid., p. 22.

134 Introduction to António Costa Pinto and Aristotle Kallis, eds., Rethinking fascism and dictatorship in Europe (Basingstoke, 2014), pp. 3–5.