Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:36:42.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labour repression in the American South: corporation, state, and race in Alabama's coal fields, 1917–1921*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Glenn Feldman
Glenn Feldman
Affiliation:
Auburn University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article is a case study of labour strife in the Alabama coal fields from 1917 to 1921. It speaks to the broader issue of labour repression in the American South by examining the patterns of repression in one industry and in one state. Several revisionist works have been written recently refuting the alleged distinctiveness of the South on the labour issue. This article supplies evidence for a surprising degree of labour militancy; the type of militancy that has been used to buttress revisionist interpretations of the similarity of southern labour to that of other American regions. In this study, however, labour militancy is understood more as a function of the desperation of southern workers confronted with distinctive issues and degrees of racial acrimony, communal antipathy toward labour, and the advantageous position of southern coal operators vis-a-vis their northern counterparts. In the face of overwhelming odds of governmental, business, press, religious, communal, and legal opposition, Alabama coal miners mounted a militant, prolonged, and biracial protest against what have been described as the worst conditions in the United States at that time.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 343 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zieger, Robert H., ed., Organized labour in the twentieth-century South (Knoxville, 1991), p. 4Google Scholar; McLaurin, Melton A., Paternalism and protest: southern cotton mill workers and organized labour, 1875–1905 (Westport, 1971)Google Scholar; Carlton, David L., Mill and town in South Carolina, 1880–1920 (Baton Rouge, 1982)Google Scholar; Martin, Charles H., ‘Southern labour relations in transition: Gadsden, Alabama, 1930–1943’ Journal of Southern History 47 (11 1981), 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Zieger, pp. 5–6, 13–34, 113–34.

3 Ibid. pp. 9, 46–9, 84–112. See also Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd et al. , Like a family: the making of a southern cotton mill world (Chapel Hill and London, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Hall's, ‘Disorderly women: gender and labour militancy in the Appalachian South’, Journal of American History, 73 (09 1986), 354–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cobb, James C., Industrialization and southern society, 1877–1984 (Lexington, 1984), p. 72.Google Scholar

4 Wolfe, Alan, The seamy side of repression (New York, 1973), pp. 104, 120–2.Google Scholar

5 Baltimore, Manufacturers Record, 12 Mar. 1914Google Scholar, 4 and 18 Oct. and 6 Dec. 1923; Tindall, George Brown, The emergence of the New South, 1913–1945 (Baton Rouge, 1967), pp. 318–20.Google Scholar

6 Cobb, pp. 19, 31.

7 Ibid. pp. 19–20; Wiener, Jonathan, Social origins of the new South: Alabama, 1860–1885 (Baton Rouge, 1978)Google Scholar. Wiener's study is one of several that argue against C. Vann Woodward's discontinuity thesis of industrial development and ‘New Men’. Wiener used Harvard Marxist sociologist Barrington Moore's concept of the ‘Prussian Road’ to industrialization to argue that Alabama's planter elite retarded growth. Billings, Dwight in Planters and the making of a “New South”: class, politics, and development in North Carolina (Chapel Hill, 1979)Google Scholar argues that planters actually took the lead in shaping and hence restraining North Carolina's industrialization. study, Lewis Wynne's, The continuity of cotton: planter politics in Georgia, 1865–1892 (Macon, 1986)Google Scholar makes the case for a planter-industrialist alliance that preserved the privileged position of Georgia planters in the new economic order. David Carlton, in Mill and town in South Carolina, did provide some support for his mentor's (Woodward's) embattled thesis. Thankfully, James C. Cobb has recently called for a cease-fire to the planter-industrialist debate, arguing that both planter and industrial elites shared the common goal of socio-economic control over the working and poorer classes. See Cobb, , ‘Beyond planters and industrialists: a new perspective on the New South’, Journal of Southern History, 54 (02 1988), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 McMillan's, Malcolm C.Constitutional development in Alabama, 1798–1901: a study in politics, the Negro, and sectionalism (Chapel Hill, 1955), is still a useful account of the disfranchisment of blacks and poor whites in Alabama.Google Scholar

9 Cobb, pp. 72, 87.

10 Taft, Philip, Organizing Dixie: Alabama workers in the industrial era (Westport, 1981), pp. 8–9, 14–5Google Scholar. See also Woodward, C. Vann, Origins of the New South, 1877–1913 (Baton Rouge, 1951), pp. 231–4, 267–8, 363.Google Scholar

11 On the distinctiveness of southern violence, see Reed, John Shelton, The enduring South: subcultural persistence in mass society (Lexington, 1972)Google Scholar, and Hackney, Sheldon, ‘Southern violence’, in Violence and America: historical and comparative perspectives, Graham, H. D. and Gurr, T. R., eds., (New York, 1969), pp. 479–500.Google Scholar

12 Johnson, James P., The politics of soft coal: the bituminous industry from World War I through the New Deal (Urbana, 1979), pp. 14, 27, 41–9, 51–9, 70–1, 80–7, 90, 97, 113.Google Scholar

13 Gross, Jimmie Frank, ‘Strikes in the coal, steel, and railroad industries in Birmingham from 1918–1922’ (unpublished M.A. thesis, Auburn University, 1962), pp. 77–8, 82, 154.Google Scholar

14 Taft, pp. 8–9, 14–15 and Woodward, pp. 231–4, 267–8, 363.

15 Tindall, pp. 336–7.

16 Birmingham News, 2 Sept. 1920.

17 Birmingham Age-Herald, 26–29 Jul. and 2 Sept. 1920.

18 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 28 Aug. 1920.Google Scholar

19 Birmingahm Age-Herald, 2 Sept. 1920.

20 Birmingham News, 24 Sept. 1920. See also Straw, Richard A., ‘The United Mine Workers of America and the 1920 coal strike in Alabama’, Alabama Review, 28 (04 1975), 110.Google Scholar

21 Gutman, Herbert G., Power and culture: essays on the American working class (New York, 1987), pp. 202–3Google Scholar, and Work, culture, and society in industrializing America: essays in American working class and social history (New York, 1976), pp. 145–8Google Scholar. See also Trotter, Joe William Jr., Coal, class, and color: blacks in southern West Virginia, 1915–1932 (Urbana, 1990), pp. 78–9, 267Google Scholar, and ‘Class and racial inequality: the southern West Virginia black coal miners' response, 1915–1932’, in Zieger, , Organized labour in the twentieth-century South, pp. 64, 70–1, 78–9.Google Scholar

22 Montgomery Advertiser, 20 Mar. 1921. See also Gross, p. 117 and Marshall, F. Ray, Labour in the South (Cambridge, 1967), p. 74.Google Scholar

23 Birmingham News, 7 Sept. 1920.

24 Papers of the DeBardeleben Coal Company, Birmingham Public Library Archives (BPLA), Birmingham, Alabama, Box 72.

25 Birmingham Age-Herald, 8–14 Sept. 1920.

26 Birmingham News and the Birmingham Age-Herald, 15 Sept. 1920.

27 See the ‘Statement of the operators' committee to the board of investigators’, 28 Feb. 1921, pp. 21–5, in the Alabama Coal Operators' Association/Alabama Mining Institute Records, 1908–1984, BPLA, Birmingham, Alabama. Hereafter cited as the ‘Papers of the Alabama Coal Operators’. See also the Birmingham News and the Birmingham Age-Herald, 16 Sept. 1920.

28 Birmingham News, 15 Sept. 1920 and Birmingham Age-Herald, 16 Sept. 1920.

29 Birmingham Age-Herald, 17 Sept. 1920.

30 Ibid. See also the Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 9 Oct. 1920.Google Scholar

31 Birmingham Age-Herald, 17–19 Sept. 1920 and the Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 2 Oct. 1920.Google Scholar

32 Birmingham Age-Herald, 21 Sept. 1920.

33 Birmingham News, 18 Sept. 1920.

34 Wayne, Flynt, Poor but proud: Alabama's poor whiles (Tuscaloosa and London, 1989), pp. 115–24.Google Scholar

35 Woodward, pp. 213–15, 233. See also Cooper, William J. and Terrill, Thomas E. Jr., eds., The American South: a history (2 vols., New York, 1991), II, 546Google Scholar; and the Birmingham Advance, 22 Apr. 1916.

36 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 23 Oct. 1920.Google Scholar

37 Birmingham Age-Herald, 26 Sept. 1920.

38 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 2 and 9 Oct. 1920.Google Scholar

39 Ibid. 6 Nov. 1920.

40 Steiner to Kilby, 26 Sept. 1920 in the file, ‘Coal strike Sept.–Nov. 1920’, Drawer 2, Alabama Governors Papers, Thomas E. Kilby, Alabama Department of Archives and History (ADAH), Montgomery, Alabama. Hereafter cited as the ‘Kilby Papers’. See also the Birmingham News, 24 Sept. and 19 Oct. 1920; and the Birmingham Age-Herald, 25–26 Sept. 1920.

41 Harris, Carl V., Political power in Birmingham, 1871–1921 (Knoxville, 1977), pp. 58–9, 270–4Google Scholar; Nunnelly, William V., Bull Connor (Tuscaloosa and London, 1991), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

42 Spero, Sterling D. and Harris, Abram L., The black worker: the Negro and the labour movement (Port Washington, 1969), pp. 362–5Google Scholar; Sledge, James L. III, ‘Black conservatism in the twentieth-century South: Oscar Adams and the Birmingham Reporter’, Proceedings of the Southern Conference on Afro-American History, 13 (02 1992), pp. 8–9, 12.Google Scholar

43 Rameau to Kilby, 14 Oct. 1920 in the Kilby Papers. See also Birmingham Reporter, 26 Feb. and 26 Mar. 1921.

44 ‘The facts about the coal strike in the mineral district of Alabama and the conditions which have risen from it’, pp. 2, 5 and 18 and the ‘Statement of the operators' committee to the board of investigators’, 28 Feb. 1921, pp. 12, 20–1; both pamphlets in the Papers of the Alabama Coal Operators. See also the Birmingham News, 7 Sept. 1920, the Birmingham Age-Herald, 14 Feb. 1921 and the Indianapolis UMW Journal, 1 Jan. 1921. For additional information on the Reverend P. Colfax Rameau, see Spero and Harris, p. 364.

45 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 23 Oct., 13 and 20 Nov., 11 and 25 Dec. 1920 and 15 Jan. 1921Google Scholar. See also the Birmingham News, 10 Jan. 1921 and 27 Oct. 1985.

46 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 25 Dec. 1920.Google Scholar

47 Birmingham News, 13 Jan. 1921 and 25 Jan. 1924.

48 For more on Wilkinson's extraordinary career, see Feldman, Glenn, ‘The transformation of Horace Wilkinson: progressivism and the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s’, Southern Historian, 14 (Spring 1993), pp. 20–40.Google Scholar

49 Birmingham News, 12–20 Feb. 1921.

50 Birmingham Age-Herald, 16–19 Jan. 1921. See also Eddins v. Galloway Coal Company and companion cases in 206 Ala. 361–78.

51 ‘The facts about the coal strike …’, pp. 13–14, in the Papers of the Alabama Coal Operators. See also the Birmingham News, 4 and 9 Feb. 1921 and the Montgomery Advertiser, 10–11 Feb. 1921.

52 Montgomery Advertiser, 10–11 Feb. 1921.

53 Birmingham News, 10 Feb. 1921.

54 Bittner to Wilson, 12 Feb. 1921 in the Presidential Papers, Woodrow Wilson Papers, series 4, reel 293. See also Gross, p. III and the Birmingham Age-Herald and News, 14 Feb. 1921, and Milner to Kilby, 13 Oct. 1919 in ‘Coal Strike Sept–Nov 1920’, drawer 2, Kilby Papers.

55 Montgomery Advertiser and the Birmingham News, 19–21 Feb. 1921 and the Indianapolis UMW Journal, 1 Mar. 1921.

56 Eddins v. Galloway Coal Company and companion cases in 206 Ala. 361–78. See the Birmingham News, 14–20 Feb. 1921 and the Montgomery Advertiser, 16–20 Feb. 1921.

57 Transcript of the oral interview with Harwell G. Davis, Mar. 1974, Department of Special Collections, Harwell Goodwin Davis Library, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama.

58 Montgomery Advertiser, 19–20 Mar. 1921.

59 Ibid. See also the Birmingham News, 20 Mar. 1921.

60 Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 4 and 26 Mar. 1921.Google Scholar

61 Philip Taft Papers, United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) file, 1909–1937, in the BPLA. See also the Birmingham News, 10 Apr. 1921.

62 Birmingham Age-Herald, 23–25 Sept. 1920 and the Birmingham News, 24 Sept. 1920.

63 ‘Statement of the operators committee to the board of investigators’, 28 Feb. 1921, Papers of the Alabama Coal Operators. See also Birmingham News, 13 and 18 Oct. 1920.

64 Birmingham Age-Herald, 14–16 Aug. and 18 Sept. 1920 and the Birmingham News, 18 Sept. 1920 and the Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 28 Aug. 1920.Google Scholar

65 Birmingham Age-Herald, 23 Sept. 1920. See also Flynt, Wayne, ‘Organized labour reform and Alabama politics, 1920’, Alabama Review, 23 (07 1970), 164.Google Scholar

66 Woodward, C. Vann, The burden of southern history (Baton Rouge, 1968), pp. 204, 210.Google Scholar

67 Gross, p. 103. See also Straw, pp. 104, 116–17.

68 Cooper and Terrill, II, 600.

69 Baker, Ray Stannard and Dodd, William E., eds., The public papers of Woodrow Wilson: war and peace, presidential messages, addresses, and public papers (1917–1924) (New York, 1927), pp. 500–2Google Scholar. See also the Birmingham, Labour Advocate, 30 Oct. 1920Google Scholar and Cobb, , ‘Beyond planters and industrialists’, 60Google Scholar, and Wolfe, pp. 104, 120–2.