Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:38:18.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II. The Social Origins of French and English Bishops in the Eighteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

Norman Ravitch
Norman Ravitch
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The increasing emphasis of historians of the eighteenth century on the role of aristocracy under the old régime justifies looking once again, more carefully, at the upper clergy of the established religious cults. The leaders of the established churches were ex officio, if not also by birth, always members of the aristocracy. No comprehension of the membership, organization, or objectives of the eighteenth-century aristocracy is possible without consideration of its ecclesiastical wing—in the case of episcopal churches, of its bishops.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , 1965 , pp. 309 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mémoires secrets du J. M. Augeard, secrétaire des commandements de la Reine Marie-Antoinette (Paris, 1866), pp. 345–6Google Scholar. The ‘lettre’ is dated July 1795.

2 Campan, Mme, Mémoires sur la vie privée de Marie-Antoinette, Reine de France et de Navarre (ed. Barriere, ) (Paris, 4th ed., 1823), I, 237–8Google Scholar.

3 London, 1849, 1, 327.

4 Warburton to Hurd, 5 July 1752; Warburton, William, Letters From a Late Eminent Prelate to One of His Friends (London, 2nd ed., 1809), p. 157Google Scholar.

5 Sermon of 20 Jan. 1760; quoted in Sykes, Norman, Church and State in England in the XVIIIth Century (Cambridge, 1934), p. 186Google Scholar.

6 Cobban, Alfred, The Myth of the French Revolution (London, 1955), p. 17Google Scholar.

7 The feuille was exactly what its name implies: a page listing vacant benefices and clerics who were newly named to them. Examples can be found in the Bibliothèque Nationale, fonds français, MSS. 20969, and in the Archives du ministère des affaires étrangères, Memoires et Documents, Fonds France, vol. 1234, fos. 197–231. That the titular head of the feuille des bénéfices was the recognized dispenser of ecclesiastical patronage is clear from a mémoire of the Maison du Roi dated in 1784. The Secretary of State for the Maison du Roi, the baron de Breteuil, had received a request from a certain abbé de Novy to be allowed to exchange his two benefices for a pension. It was decided that since the abbé was not demanding a benefice, but rather was offering to surrender two, and since the pension he sought was not to be paid from the revenues of a bishopric or from those of an abbey, the minister of the feuille could have no interest in the affair. Archives nationales, 01 595, no. 251. Similar evidence of the specific role of the minister of the feuille is offered in a letter of the minister of the feuille, Marbeuf, to Breteuil, 30 April 1788; Archives nationales, 01 595, no. 474.

8 Documentation of the role of Roche-Aymon, Marbeuf, and Le Franc de Pompignan may be found in the following manuscript sources: Archives du ministère des affaires étrangères, Correspondance politique, Rome, vol. 885, fo. 45; Archives nationales, 01 473, pp. 219 and 378; and Archives du ministère des affaires étrangères, Correspondance politique, Rome, vol. 911, fo. 97.

9 Genealogical information has been gathered from the following sources: Bluche, J., L'Origine des magistrats du parlement de Paris au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1956)Google Scholar; Chesnaye-Desbois, François Alex-andre Aubert de la, Dictionnaire de la Noblesse (Paris, 3rd ed., 1863-1876), 19 vols.Google Scholar; Gallia Christiana in provincias ecclesiasticas distributa qua series et historia archie-piscoporum, episcoporum et abbatum (Paris, 1856–1899), 16 vols.Google Scholar; Hoefer, Jean Chretien Ferdinand, Nouvelle Biographic générate depuis les temps les plus reculés jusqu'à nos jours (Paris, 1855-1866), 46 vols.Google Scholar; Fisquet, Honoré, La France, pontificate (Paris 1864-1873), 21 vols.Google Scholar; d'Hozier, Louis-Pierre, Armorial général de la France (Paris, 1738-1872), 7 vols.Google Scholar; Jean, Armand, Les Évêques et les archevêques de France depuis 1682 jusqu'à 1801 (Paris, 1891)Google Scholar; Lainé, P. Louis, Archives généalogiques et historiques de la noblesse de France (Paris, 1828–1850), 11 vols.Google Scholar; J. F. and Michaud, L. G., Biographie universelle ancienne et moderne (Paris, 2nd ed., 1843-1865), 45 vols.Google Scholar; Moréri, Louis, Le Grand Dictionnaire historique (Basle, new ed., 1740), 6 vols., Supplement (Basle, 1743-5), 3 volsGoogle Scholar.

10 Sicard, Abbé Augustin, L'Ancien Clergé de France: les Cliques avant la Révolution (Paris, 5th ed., 1912), p. 7Google Scholar.

11 Carré, Henri, La Noblesse de France et l'opinion publique au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1920) p. 8Google Scholar.

12 Pyle to Kerrich, 20 Aug. 1752; Pyle, Edmund, Memoirs of a Royal Chaplain, 1729-1763 London, 1905), p. 179Google Scholar.

13 The Lives of Dr Edward Pocock, the Celebrated Orientalist, by Dr Twells; of Dr Zachary Pearce, Bishop of Rochester, and of Dr Thomas Newton, Bishop of Bristol, by Themselves; of the Rev. Philip Skelton, by Mr Burdy (London, 1816), I, 406–7Google Scholar.

14 17 & 18 Charles II, ch. 10.

15 The phrase ‘by birth’ denotes born in England rather than of English ethnic origin. If one were to consider those whose families were relatively new to Ireland, the non-Irish proportion would be even larger.

16 Data on the family backgrounds of the English bishops have been derived from the following sources: G. E. C[, okayne], The Complete Peerage (London, rev. ed., 1910-1953), 12 vols.Google Scholar; Dictionary of National Biography; Foster, Joseph (ed.), Alumni Oxonienses (1500-1714) (Oxford, 1891), 4 vols.Google Scholar, and Alumni Oxonienses (1715–1886) (London and Oxford, 1888), 4 vols.Google Scholar; Venn, John and Venn, J. A. (eds.), Alumni Cantabrigienses, Part I, From Earliest Times to 1751 (Cambridge, 1922-7), 4 vols.Google Scholar; Venn, J. A. (ed.), Alumni Cantabrigienses, Part II, 1752-1900 (Cambridge, 1940-1951), 4 volsGoogle Scholar.

17 , Sykes, op. cit. p. 407Google Scholar.

18 The sources for the family backgrounds of the Irish bishops are the same as those for the English, with the addition of Burtchaell, George Dames and Sadleir, Thomas Ulick (eds.), Alumni Dublinenses (London, 1924)Google Scholar.

19 ‘First Letter Addressed to a Member of the Present Parliament on the Proposals of Peace with the Regicide Directory of France’ (1796); The Works of Edmund Burke (London, 1872), v, 190Google Scholar.

20 L'Ancien Régime et la Révolution, ed. Mayer, J.-P. (Paris, 1952-3), 1, 143Google Scholar.

21 , Sykes, op. cit. pp. 186–7Google Scholar.

22 Estimates of the non-conformist Protestant population of England in the late eighteenth century may be found in Fryer, C. E., ‘The Numerical Decline of Dissent in England Previous to the Industrial Revolution’, The American Journal of Theology, XVII (1913), 239Google Scholar. An estimate placing the Catholic population of England in the late eighteenth century at 48,000 is cited by Williams, Basil, The Whig Supremacy 1714-1760 (Oxford, 1939), p. 67Google Scholar. Estimates of the Protestant Population of France is given in Poland, Burdette C., French Protestantism and the French Revolution (Princeton, 1957), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Op. cit. 1, 147-8.

24 Bér[anger], Thomas-Guillaume, Haro sur la F[euille] des B[énéfices] (Grenoble, 1789), pp. 21–2Google Scholar.