No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
1 See the excellent review by Roger, Hood in the Times Higher Education Supplement, 15 Sept. 1995, p. 29.Google Scholar
2 One reflects with some irony upon the recent proliferation of landmark reports and the committees who produced them – Woolf (whose focus was inevitably upon local prisons), Woodcock and Learmont (whose personal agendas have taken the prison service along an altogether new road) – and wonders whether they will receive the detached and intelligent reflections of such an historian in time. See Woolf, report (1991) Prison disturbances, London: HMSPGoogle Scholar; Home Office (1995) The escape from Whitemoor prison (The Woodcock report), London: HMSOGoogle Scholar; Home Office (1995) Review of prison service security in England and Wales and the escape from Parkhurstprison (the Learmont report), London: HMSO.Google Scholar
3 See Hansard Lords Debate on The prison service, pp. 1064–1100, 1995.
4 Instruction to Governors (IG 74/1995), Incentives and earned privileges for prisoners: national framework.